Aspects Influencing ESP Syllabus Design in Lifelong Military Education
Abstract
This paper aims to identify and compare aspects affecting English language syllabus design at military language centres in six NATO countries. Close attention is devoted to course syllabi for Level 1 (Survival; approximately corresponding to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) Level A2) and Level 2 (Functional; approximately corresponding to CEFR Level B1). The descriptive quantitative research, conducted in 2019, concentrated on determining which stakeholders participated in creating the English language syllabi presently in use and which critical aspects of syllabus design the creators considered in the process of their compilation. The findings reveal that active teacher participation is one of the most prominent characteristics of the entire syllabus design process in all of the institutions examined, which results from the specific nature of the courses focused on preparing learners for final English examinations in a military context. Integrated syllabi, which are product-oriented and teacher-led, are another defining characteristic typical for both levels in all institutions. The syllabi in the countries studied are designed similarly, considering such crucial aspects as the learners’ entrance level, previous syllabus, exit requirements, and the type and length of courses. The study offers new insight into the organisational structure of courses at the elementary level, and an increase in the number of lessons in courses for Level 1 organised within the Czech army is strongly proposed.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.4.4
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alhuqbani, M. N. (2014). Teaching English to Saudi Police Cadets: An Evaluation Study. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(5), 999–1008. http://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.5.5.999-1008
Benavent, G. T., & Sánchez-Reyes, S. (2015). Target situation as a key element for ESP (Law Enforcement) syllabus design. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 173, 143–148. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.044
Bouckaert, M. (2019). Current Perspectives on Teachers as Materials Developers: Why, What, and How? RELC Journal, 50(3), 439–456. http://doi.org/10.1177/0033688218810549
Breen, M. P. (1984). Process Syllabuses for the Language Classroom. In: General English Syllabus Design: Curriculum and syllabus design for the general English classroom. Pergamon Press Ltd. https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/teacheng/files/F044%20ELT-37%20General%20English%20Syllabus%20Design_v3.pdf
Brown, J. D. (1995). The Elements of Language Curriculum: A Systematic Approach to Program Development. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Brown, J. D. (2016). Introducing Needs Analysis and English for Specific Purposes. New York: Routledge.
Brumfit, C. (1984). Function and Structure of a State School Syllabus for Learners of Second or Foreign Languages with Heterogeneous Needs. In: General English Syllabus Design: Curriculum and syllabus design for the general English classroom. Pergamon Press Ltd. https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/teacheng/files/F044%20ELT-37%20General%20English%20Syllabus%20Design_v3.pdf
Candlin, C. H. N. (1984). Syllabus Design as a Critical Process. In: General English Syllabus Design: Curriculum and syllabus design for the general English classroom. Pergamon Press Ltd. https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/teacheng/files/F044%20ELT-37%20General%20English%20Syllabus%20Design_v3.pdf
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. 4th ed., Boston, MA: Pearson.
Chan, C. S. C. (2015). How would an economist maximize effectiveness in language teaching subject to constraints? Language Teaching Insights from Other Fields, 57–68. http://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccw056
Chan, C. S. C. (2018). Proposing and illustrating a research-informed approach to curriculum development for specific topics in business English. English for Specific Purposes, 52, 27–46. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2018.07.001
Chra?ska, M. (2006). U?vod do vy?zkumu v pedagogice [Introduction to pedagogical research]. Olomouc: Palacky University.
Cowling, J. D. (2007). Needs analysis: Planning a syllabus for a series of intensive workplace courses at a leading Japanese company. English for Specific Purposes, 26(4), 426–442. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.10.003
Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for Specific Purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. 7th ed., UK, Cambridge University Press.
Edwards, N. (2000). Language for business: Effective needs assessment, syllabus design and materials preparation in a practical ESP case study. English for Specific Purposes, 19(3), 29–296. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906 (98)00029-5
Ellis, R. (2018). Towards a modular language curriculum for using tasks. Language Teaching Research, 23(4), 454–475. http://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818765315
Graves, K. ed. (1996). Teachers as Course Developers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hadley, G. (1998). Returning Full Circle: a Survey of Efl Syllabus Designs for the New Millennium. RELC Journal, 29(2), 50–71. http://doi.org/10.1177/003368829802900203
Hidayat, R. (2018). A Needs Analysis in Learning English for Airline Staff Program. English Education Journal, 9(4), 589–613. http://jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/EEJ/article/view/12516
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes: A Learning-centred approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jonáková, S., Mocková, N., & Muto, F. (2019). Foreign language syllabus design in military education. EDULEARN19 Proceedings. http://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2019.0360
Lee, Ch. (2016). Principles and Practices of ESP Course Design - A Case Study of a University of Science and Technology. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 15(2), 94–105.
Malicka, A., Guerrero, R. G., & Norris, J. M. (2019). From needs analysis to task design: Insights from an English for specific purposes context. Language Teaching Research, 23(1), 78–106. http://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817714278
Nation, I. S. P., & Macalister, J. (2010). Language Curriculum Design. London: Routledge.
NATO STANDARD 6001. https://www.natobilc.org/files/ATrainP-5%20EDA%20V2%20E.pdf
Park, K. C. (2015). A needs analysis of English for Korean naval officers. IDEALS @ Illinois. http://hdl.handle.net/2142/78565
Pelika?n, J. (2004). Za?klady empiricke?ho vy?zkumu pedagogicky?ch jevu? [Basics of empirical research in pedagogical elements]. Prague: Karolinum.
Piirimees, A., Rozsypálková, J., & Boltovsky, M. (2020). Teachers’ Understanding of Contemporary Approaches to Teaching and Learning. http://doi.org/10.15405/epiceepsy.20111.21
Qaddomi, H. A. (2013). English for Specific Purposes in Palestinian Context. Determining EFL Cadets’ Needs at Al Istiqlal University. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(7), 1110–1122. http://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.7.1110–1122
Rebenko, M., Nikolenko, O., & Rebenko, V. (2019). Listening Comprehension Proficiency Development of Information Technology Students in ESP Classroom. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(11), 245–264. http://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.11.15
Richards, J. C. (1990). The Language Teaching Matrix. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rüter, F., & Martin, A. (2021). How Do the Timing and Duration of Courses Affect Participation in Adult Learning and Education? A Panel Analysis. Adult Education Quarterly. http://doi.org/10.1177/07417136211019032
Sari, R. (2003). A Suggested English Language Teaching Program for Gülhane Military Medical Academy. https://silo.tips/download/a-suggested-english-language-teaching-program-for-glhane-military-medical-academ
Serafini, E. J., Lake, J. B., & Long, M. H. (2015). Needs analysis for specialized learner populations: Essential methodological improvements. English for Specific Purposes, 40, 11–26. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2015.05.002
Shykhnenko, K., & Nozhovnik, O. (2020). ESP Course Delivered to Personnel Working in Shifts for the State Emergency Service of Ukraine through a Student-Tailored Model. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(3), 295–309. http://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.3.16
Solak, E. (2010). A Suggested Syllabus for the Advanced Level English Course at Gendarmerie Schools Command in Accordance with NATO STANAG 6001 Level 3 Perspective. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED553576.pdf
Swan, M. (1985b). A critical look at the Communicative Approach (2). ELT Journal, 39(2), 76–87.
Todea, L., & Demarcsek, R. (2017). Needs analysis for language course design. A case study for engineering and business students. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 200 012064.
Ur, P. (1996). A Course in Language Teaching: Practice and Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Widdowson, H. G. (2002). Aspects of Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Woodrow, L. (2018). Introducing Course Design in English for Specific Purposes. New York: Routledge.
Yalden, J. (1984). Syllabus Design in General Education: Options for ELT. In: General English Syllabus Design: Curriculum and syllabus design for the general English classroom. Pergamon Press Ltd. https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/teacheng/files/F044%20ELT-37%20General%20English%20Syllabus%20Design_v3.pdf.
Ya?ar, N. (2015). A Suggested Negotiated ESP Syllabus for Multinational Peacekeeping Operations within a Constructivist Perspective. https://dspace.gazi.edu.tr/bitstream/handle/20.500.12602/187983/b6c8b269648e8b1f8e396de0ebda5367.pdf;jsessionid=E9C0196E94264D65E5F63995F3D86C4B?sequence=1
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 1694-2116
p-ISSN: 1694-2493