Oral Assessment and Grade Integrity: A Case Study

Vidar Gynnild

Abstract


The construct of "grade integrity" refers to the degree to which awarded grades accurately represent the breadth and depth of academic achievement (Sadler, 2009b). This case study examines issues of grade integrity at university level by studying a class of 26 students in science and engineering in Norway. While the use of two sets of oral examinations, a mid-term and a final examination, appears to be well justified, grade integrity is challenged by the allocation of scores acquired at the two assessment points, and by issues associated with assigning scores at the mid-term exam. The introduction of an assessment rubric increased consistency and inter-rater reliability at the final examination, but challenges still remain in enabling greater transparency in assessment practices. A key task is to incorporate institutional policies and assessment frameworks in grading, thereby empowering students by making them familiar with standards and criteria.


Keywords


education,assessment

Full Text:

PDF

References


Brown, S., & Knight, P. (1994). Assessing learners in higher education. London: Kogan Page.

Gynnild, V. (2001). Læringsorientert eller eksamensfokusert? Nærstudier av pedagogisk utviklingsarbeid i sivilingeniørstudiet. Dr. philos, Fakultet for samfunnsvitenskap og teknologiledelse, Pedagogisk institutt, Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet, Trondheim.

Jawitz, J. (2009). Learning in the academic workplace: the harmonization of the collective and individual habitus. Studies in Higher Education, 34(6), 601-614.

Johansson, T., & Kjellemo, B. T. (2004). Retningslinjer for bruk av det nasjonale karaktersystemet, from http://matematikkradet.no/dokumenter/2004-05-10_bokstavkar.pdf

Joughin, G. (1998). Dimensions of Oral Assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(4), 367 - 378.

Joughin, G. (2011). "Speaking of which ...": The Intriguing Case of the Spoken Word in Assessment. HERDSA news, 32(8).

KUF. (2001). St.meld. nr. 27 (2000-2001) Gjør din plikt - Krev din rett Oslo: Retrieved from http://www.regjeringen.no/Rpub/STM/20002001/027/PDFA/STM200020010027000DDDPDFA.pdf.

Land, R., Cousin, G., Meyer, J. H. F., & Davies, P. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (3)*: implications for course design and evaluation. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving Student Learning Diversity and Inclusivity. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.

Morrison, H., Cowan, P., & Harte, S. (1997). The Impact of Modular Aggregation on the Reliability of Final Degrees and the Transparency of European Credit Transfer. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 22(4), 405-417.

Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Rust, C. (2002). The impact of assessment on student learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 3(3), 145-158.

Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative Assessment and the Design of Instructional Systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119-144.

Sadler, D. R. (2005). Interpretations of criteria-based assessment and grading in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(2), 175 - 194.

Sadler, D. R. (2009a). Fidelity as a precondition for integrity in grading academic achievement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education.

Sadler, D. R. (2009b). Grade integrity and the representation of academic achievement. Studies in Higher Education, 34(7), 807 - 826.

Sadler, D. R. (2010). Assessment in higher education. In M. Baker, B. & Peterson, P. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of education. Oxford: Elsevier.

Smith Macklin, A. (2007). Communities of Practice. In G. M. Bodner & M. Orgill (Eds.), Theoretical Frameworks for Research in Chemistry/Science Education (pp. 204-227). New Jersey: Pearson Education.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems. Organization, 7(2), 225-246.

Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.

Zuber-Skerritt, O. (2002). The concept of action learning. The Learning Organization, 9(3), 114-124.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493