In-Depth Analysis of Contributing Factors Impacting Grade 12 Learners' Performance in Life Sciences “Investigation Questions”: A South African Case Study

Sakyiwaa Boateng, Bongeka Maliwa

Abstract


This study sought to explore contributing factors affecting grade 12 learners’ performance in Life Sciences “investigation questions” in rural high schools in the Oliver Reginald Tambo Inland District of South Africa. The study was underpinned by the social constructivism theory. A qualitative case study design was employed to collect the data. Purposeful sampling was used to select three schools from one circuit. Three Life Sciences teachers and nine learners were purposefully selected to participate in the study. The interview was the main instrument used to collect data. The data were analysed using thematic analysis to generate themes. The main findings of the study indicated: teachers' low pedagogical content knowledge on practical investigation questions; a lack of teaching resources; a lack of parental support; and language proficiency influence on learner understanding. Thus, it is recommended that the Department of Basic Education provide all rural schools with well-furnished laboratories to enable the teachers to conduct practical investigation activities. Furthermore, teachers need to be trained regularly to enhance their content knowledge and equip them with the different pedagogies in teaching Life Science investigations

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.2.11


Keywords


Life Sciences; learners; learner performance; scientific investigation; teachers

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945–1969. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701749305

Aikens, M.L., & Kulacki, A.R. (2023). Identifying group work experiences that increase students’ self-efficacy for quantitative biology tasks. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.22-04-0076.

Akinbadewa, B.O., & Sofowora, O.A. (2020). The effectiveness of multimedia instructional learning packages in enhancing secondary school students’ attitudes toward biology. International Journal on Studies in Education, 2(2), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.19

Akindele, A.T., Arulogun, O.T., Taye, G.T., Amare, S.Y., Van Reisen, M., Berhe, K.F., & Gusite, B. (2022). The impact of COVID-19 and FAIR data innovation on distance education in Africa. Data Intelligence, 4(4), 1013–1032. https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_a_00184

Alameh, S., Abd?El?Khalick, F., & Brown, D. (2022). The nature of scientific explanation: Examining the perceptions of the nature, quality, and “goodness” of explanation among college students, science teachers, and scientists. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(1), 100–135. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21792

Amrulloh, M.S., & Galushasti, A. (2022). Professional development teacher to improve skills of science process and creativity of learners. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 16(3), 299-307.

Anderson, R.D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1015171124982

Ashrab o‘g‘li, A.H. (2023). Pedagogical aspects of using virtual laboratories in the educational process in higher education. Best Journal of Innovation in Science, Research and Development, 2(4), 92-97.

Ayeni, M.F. (2021). The challenges and prospects of science education development in Africa. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 12(4), 120-129. https://doi.org/10.36941/mjss-2021-0033

Baskerville, D., & Anderson, D. (2023). Integrating science and drama to support learning about the nature of science in New Zealand primary classrooms. In D. McGregor, & D. Anderson (Eds.), Learning science through drama: Exploring international perspectives (pp. 103-118). Springer International. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17350-9_7

Bay, M., Staver, J., Bryan, T., & Hale, J. (1992). Science instruction for the mildly handicapped: Direct instruction versus discovery teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(6), 555-570. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290605

Belina, A. (2023). Semi-structured interviewing as a tool for understanding informal civil society. Voluntary Sector Review, 14(2), 331-347. https://doi.org/10.1332/204080522x16454629995872

Berg, C.A.R., Bergendahl, V.C.B., Lundberg, B., & Tibell, L. (2003). Benefiting from an open-ended experiment? A comparison of attitudes to, and outcomes of, an expository versus an open-inquiry version of the same experiment. International Journal of Science Education, 25(3), 351–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210145738

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brown, C., & Jones, L. (2018). Teacher practices and student learning in science inquiry: A review of the literature. Science Education, 102(2), 215-241. https://doi1.org/0.1002/sce.21463 3

Celik, I. (2023). Towards Intelligent-TPACK: An empirical study on teachers’ professional knowledge to ethically integrate artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools into education. Computers in Human Behavior, 138, 107468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107468

Danso, S. (2020). Exploring students‘ academic achievements in electricity and magnetism through learning styles and learning style-based instructional strategies in Mthatha high schools [Doctoral dissertation, School of Education, Faculty of Humanities, University of the Witwatersrand].

Davis, E.A., Petish, D., & Smithey, J. (2006). Challenges new science teachers face. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 607–651. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076004607

Department of Basic Education (DBE). (2011). Curriculum Assessment Policy Statements (CAPS), Grades 10–12: Life Sciences. Government Printers.

Department of Basic Education (DBE). (2021). National senior certificate diagnostic report. https://www.education.gov.za › Resources › Reports.

Dhurumraj, T., & Broadhurst, J.-L. (2023). Investigating the classroom teaching practices of life sciences teachers in Gauteng. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 12(2), 393–406. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v12i2.2389

Du Plessis, P., & Mestry, R. (2019). Teachers for rural schools – a challenge for South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 39(Supplement 1), S1–S9. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v39ns1a1774

Gunawan, H. (2019). The implementation of 2013 curriculum in English teaching: Stories from rural areas. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 1(2), 65. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v1i2.616

Hijar, S., Sailan, Z., & Kamaluddin, K. (2020). The effect of scientific approach in teaching reading comprehension at the twelfth grade students in Sman 1 Wawonii.. Journal of Language Education and Educational Technology (JLEET), 5(2), 114. https://doi.org/10.33772/jleet.v5i2.13202

Holley, D., & Park, S. (2020). Integration of science disciplinary core ideas and environmental themes through constructivist teaching practices. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 16(5). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/115583

Huang, L., & Lajoie, S.P. (2021). Process analysis of teachers’ self-regulated learning patterns in technological pedagogical content knowledge development. Computers & Education, 166, 104169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104169.

Hume, A., & Coll, R. (2008). Student experiences of carrying out a practical science investigation under direction. International Journal of Science Education, 30(9), 1201–1228. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701445052

In'am, A., & Hajar, S. (2017). Learning geometry through discovery learning using a scientific approach. International Journal of Instruction, 10(01), 55-70. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.1014a

Jackson, C., De Beer, J., & White, L. (2020). The affective affordances of frugal science (using foldscopes) during a life sciences water quality practical. Perspectives in Education, 38(1), 224–241. https://doi.org/10.18820/2519593x/pie.v38i1.16

Jamil, F.M., Linder, S.M., & Stegelin, D.A. (2018). Early childhood teacher beliefs about STEAM education after a professional development conference. Early Childhood Education Journal, 46, 409-417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-017-0875-5

Jiang, S., Li, L., & Cui, Y. (2023). Why teaching and research activities lack vitality?: A probe into the basic psychological needs of teachers. Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 7(1), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.26689/jcer.v7i1.4555

Jorgenson, O., Vanosdall, R., Massey, V., & Cleveland, J. (2014). Doing good science in middle school, expanded 2nd edition: A practical STEM guide. NSTA Press. https://doi.org/10.2505/9781938946073

Kapur, R (2018). Factors influencing the students’ academic performance in secondary schools in India. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 7(11), 575-587.

Kurdi, M., Kundra, P., Mehrotra, S., Jahan, N., Kiran, S., & Vadhanan, P. (2022). Newer teaching-learning methods and assessment modules in anaesthesia education. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, 66(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_1103_21

Kusumawati, E. (2022). School committee participation in realizing the quality of education. Infokum, 10(5), 880-886. https://doi.org/10.58471/infokum.v10i5.1176

Lederman, J.S., Lederman, N.G., Bartos, S.A., Bartels, S.L., Meyer, A.A., & Schwartz, R.S. (2014). Meaningful assessment of learners' understandings about scientific inquiry—The Views About Scientific Inquiry (VASI) questionnaire. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), 65-83.

Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.

López-Zerón, G., Bilbao-Nieva, M., & Clements, K. (2021). Conducting member checks with multilingual research participants from diverse backgrounds. Journal of Participatory Research Methods, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.24412

Maciver, D.J., Young, E.M., & Washburn, B. (2002). Instructional practices and motivation during middle school (with special attention to science). In A. Wigfield, & J.S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of Achievement Motivation (pp.333-351). Elsevier.

MacLeod, A., Burm, S., & Mann, K. (2022). Constructivism: Learning theories and approaches to research. In J. Cleland, & S.J. Durning (Eds.), Researching Medical Education (pp.25-40). John Wiley & Sons.

Maduna, N.S. (2022). Teacher well-being in a rural Mpumalanga secondary school environment: A positive psychology perspective [Doctoral dissertation, University of South Africa].

Maeng, J.L., Whitworth, B.A., Bell, R.L., & Sterling, D.R. (2020). The effect of professional development on elementary science teachers’ understanding, confidence, and classroom implementation of reform?based science instruction. Science Education, 104(2), 326–353. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21562

Maharma, H., & Abusa’aleek, R. (2022). Teachers’ feedback and students’ academic achievement. International Education Studies, 15(6), 65. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v15n6p65

Mji, A., & Makgato, M. (2006). Factors associated with high school learners' poor performance: A spotlight on mathematics and physical science. South African Journal of Education, 26(2), 253-266.

Moshoeshoe, R. (2023). Long-term effects of primary education expansion on educational achievement. Annals of Economics and Statistics, 149, 3-38. https://doi.org/10.2307/48718078

Mupa, P., & Chinooneka, T. (2019). Factors contributing to ineffective teaching and learning in primary schools: Why are schools in decadence? Journal of Education and Practice, 6(19), 125–132.

Muzah, P. (2011). An exploration into the school related factors that causes high matriculation failure rates in physical science in public high schools of Alexandra Township [Doctoral thesis, University of South Africa].

Naidoo, I. (2017). Quality of the Grade 12 life sciences curriculum: Perceptions and possibilities for lifelong learning [Doctoral dissertation, Durban University of Technology].

National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. National Academies Press.

Ndayambaje, J.B., Bikorimana, E., & Nsanganwimana, F. (2021). Factors contributing to the students’ poor performance in biology subject: A case study of ordinary level in rural secondary schools of Rwamagana district. GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 15(3), 249-261. https://doi.org/10.30574/gscbps.2021.15.3.0163

Netshivhumbe, N.P., & Mudau, A.V. (2021). Teaching challenges in the senior phase natural sciences classroom in South African schools: A case study of Vhembe district in the Limpopo Province. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.988313

Ntekane, A. (2018). Parental involvement in education. [Doctoral dissertation, North-West University]. http://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.36330.21440

Ogbonnaya, U.I. (2019). The reliability of students’ evaluation of teaching at secondary school level. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 77(1), 97-109.

Ogunmade, T.O. (2005). The status and quality of secondary science teaching and learning in Lagos State, Nigeria. [DPhil thesis, North-West University].

Oliveira, H., & Bonito, J. (2023). Practical work in science education: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1151641

Pohan, L., Maulina, J., & Hardianti, T. (2020). Students' critical thinking: A study on science teaching material based on the scientific approach. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(12B), 8129-8136. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.082615

Sancar, R., Atal, D., & Deryakulu, D. (2021). A new framework for teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 101, 103305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103305

Seale, C. (1999). Quality in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 5(4), 465–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049900500402

Sisson, J.H. (2023). Bringing children’s and teachers’ agency together to create meaningful learning that matters in a diverse preschool. International Journal of Early Childhood. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-023-00364-z

Small, H. (2023). Bayesian history of science: The case of Watson and Crick and the structure of DNA. Quantitative Science Studies, 4(1), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00233

Smith, J., & Wilson, A. (2019). The impact of teacher knowledge and skills on students' ability to engage in scientific inquiry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(6), 613-627. https://doi:10.1007/s10956-019-09802-52

Sutherland, W.J., Taylor, N.G., MacFarlane, D., Amano, T., Christie, A.P., Dicks, L.V., Lemasson, A.J., Littlewood, N.A., Martin, P.A., Ockendon, N., Petrovan, S.O., Robertson, R.J., Rocha, R., Shackelford, G.E., Smith, R.K., Tyler, E.H.M., & Wordley, C.F.R. (2019). Building a tool to overcome barriers in research-implementation spaces: The Conservation Evidence database. Biological Conservation, 238, 108199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108199

Tait, K., McCubbin, F., Smith, C., Agee, C., Beaty, D., Busemann, H., Carrier, B., Cavalazzi, B., Debaille, V., Hutzler, A., & Usui, T. (2021). MSR Science Planning Group 2 (MSPG2): Planning for the curation of MSR samples in a sample receiving facility. ESS Open Archive. https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10509259.1

Teppo, M., Soobard, R., & Rannikmäe, M. (2021). A study comparing intrinsic motivation and opinions on learning science (Grades 6) and taking the International PISA Test (Grade 9). Education Sciences, 11(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11010014

Vygotsky, L.S. (1968). Thought and language (newly revised, translated, and edited by Alex Kozulin). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model?based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92(5), 941–967. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20259

Yin, R.K. (2018). Case study research: Design and method (6th edition). Sage.

Zaim, M. (2017). Implementing scientific approach to teach English at senior high school in Indonesia. Asian Social Science, 13(2), 33. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v13n2p33


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493