Teachers’ Professional Development and Pedagogical Shift towards Dialogic Teaching in Malaysian Lower Secondary ESL Classrooms

Sheila Adelina Ramasamy, Azlin Zaiti Zainal

Abstract


This study reports on teachers’ pedagogical changes upon attending a professional development programme. In supporting learners of a second language (L2), dialogic teaching was emphasised as an intervention programme in Malaysian lower secondary ESL classrooms. Dialogic teaching is a pedagogical approach that focuses on the importance of classroom talk in constructing knowledge collectively (Alexander, 2018). This study explored the perceptions of four rural L2 teachers who were participants in a professional development on dialogic teaching and investigated their classroom practices using the approach. The study was qualitative in nature which comprised four individual semi-structured interviews and nine classroom observations for the data collection. The case study method was employed to boost the reliability of the interview findings in which three of the teachers’ classes were observed, video-taped, transcribed, and analysed to identify the dialogic features prevalent in the teachers’ discourse pattern.  The findings of this study indicated that the teachers perceived dialogic teaching as a meaningful interactive discourse structure that facilitated L2 learning and, to an extent, demonstrated a pedagogical shift that took advantage of the dialogic teaching principles and talk repertoire introduced during the professional development. Dialogic teaching strategies such as whole class and small group discussions increased the participation and engagement of students which led to better student outcomes. The teachers had acquired the skills of questioning to facilitate talk amongst the students. Nevertheless, the teachers were challenged with issues of students’ proficiency that obstructed their effective intervention process. The findings have key pedagogical implications in terms of teacher discourse patterns and for further investigation on the enactment of dialogic teaching in facilitating second language.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.7.20


Keywords


classroom discourse; dialogic teaching; pedagogical approach; second language learning; teacher professional development

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alexander, R. (2018). Developing dialogic teaching: genesis, process, trial. Research Papers in Education, 33(5), 561–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2018.1481140

Al Balushi, K. (2016). The Use of Online Semi-Structured Interviews in Interpretive Research. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online Index Copernicus Value Impact Factor, 57(4), 2319–7064. https://doi.org/10.21275/ART20181393

Asterhan, C. S. C., Howe, C., Lefstein, A., Matusov, E., & Reznitskaya, A. (2020). Controversies and consensus in research on dialogic teaching and learning. Dialogic Pedagogy, 8(January), S1–S16. https://doi.org/10.5195/DPJ.2020.312

Barekat, B., & Mohammadi, S. (2014). The Contribution of the Teachers’ Use of Dialogic Discourse Pattern to the Improvement of the Students’ Speaking Ability. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 353–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.426

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Böheim, R., Schnitzler, K., Gröschner, A., Weil, M., Knogler, M., Schindler, A. K., Alles, M., & Seidel, T. (2021). How changes in teachers’ dialogic discourse practice relate to changes in students’ activation, motivation and cognitive engagement. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100450

Boyd, M. P. (2015). Relations Between Teacher Questioning and Student Talk in One Elementary ELL Classroom. Journal of Literacy Research, 47(3), 370–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X16632451

Castillo-Montoya, M. (2016). Preparing for interview research: The interview protocol refinement framework. Qualitative Report, 21(5), 811–831. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2337

Chang, B. (2017). Dialogues in Promoting Knowledge Construction, 0–5.

Chow, B. W. Y., Hui, A. N. N., Li, Z., & Dong, Y. (2021). Dialogic teaching in English-as-a-second-language classroom: Its effects on first graders with different levels of vocabulary knowledge. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820981399

Creswell, J.W. (2013) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th Edition, SAGE Publications, Inc., London.

Cui, R., & Teo, P. (2021). Dialogic education for classroom teaching: a critical review. Language and Education, 35(3), 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2020.1837859

Díez-Palomar, J., Chan, M. C. E., Clarke, D., & Padrós, M. (2021). How does dialogical talk promote student learning during small group work? An exploratory study. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 30 (December 2020), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100540

Doley, S. K. (2019). Discourse patterns in English as an L2 classroom in India. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 1223–1238. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12178a

English Language Teaching Centre (2013). Oral Proficiency In English For Secondary Schools (OPS-ENGLISH) Trainer’s Guide. Tinta Press Sdn. Bhd

Flick, U. (Ed.). (2013). The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis. Sage.

Hardman, J. (2019). Developing and supporting the implementation of a dialogic pedagogy in primary schools in England. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102908

Hennessy, S., Kershner, R., Calcagni, E., & Ahmed, F. (2021). Supporting practitioner-led inquiry into classroom dialogue with a research-informed professional learning resource: A design-based approach. Review of Education, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3269

Hennessy, S., Rojas-Drummond, S., Higham, R., Márquez, A. M., Maine, F., Ríos, R. M., & Barrera, M. J. (2016). Developing a coding scheme for analysing classroom dialogue across educational contexts. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 9, 16–44. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.12.001

Kim, M. Y., & Wilkinson, I. A. G. (2019). What is dialogic teaching? Constructing, deconstructing, and reconstructing a pedagogy of classroom talk. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 21(February), 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.02.003

Lee, R. (2016). Implementing Dialogic Teaching in a Singapore English Language Classroom. RELC Journal, 47(3), 279–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688216631171

Mercer, N., Dawes, L., & Staarman, J. K. (2009). Dialogic teaching in the primary science classroom. Language and Education, 23(4), 353-369.

Nystrand, M., Gamoran, A., Kachur, R., & Prendergast, C. (1997). Opening Dialogue. Teachers College Press.

Osborne, J. F., Borko, H., Fishman, E., Gomez Zaccarelli, F., Berson, E., Busch, K. C., Reigh, E., & Tseng, A. (2019). Impacts of a practice-based professional development program on elementary teachers’ facilitation of and student engagement with scientific argumentation. American Educational Research Journal, 56(4), 1067-1112.

Reznitskaya A., & Gregory, M. (2013). Student Thought and Classroom Language: Examining the Mechanisms of Change in Dialogic Teaching. Educational Psychologist, 48(2), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.775898

Ruthven, K., Mercer, N., Taber, K. S., Guardia, P., Hofmann, R., Ilie, S, Luthman S., Riga, F. (2017). A research-informed dialogic-teaching approach to early secondary school mathematics and science: the pedagogical design and field trial of the epiSTEMe intervention. Research Papers in Education, 32(1), 18–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2015.1129642

Sedlacek, M., & Sedova, K. (2017). How many are talking? The role of collectivity in dialogic teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 85, 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.07.001

Sedova, K. (2017). A case study of a transition to dialogic teaching as a process of gradual change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 278–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.018

Sedova, K., Salamounova, Z., & Svaricek, R. (2014). Troubles with dialogic teaching. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 3(4), 274–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2014.04.001

Snell, J., & Lefstein, A. (2018). “Low Ability,” Participation, and Identity in Dialogic Pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 55(1), 40–78. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217730010

Swain, M., & Watanabe, Y. (2012). Languaging: Collaborative Dialogue as a Source of Second Language Learning. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, January. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0664

Teo, P. (2013). “Stretch your answers”: Opening the dialogic space in teaching and learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 2(2), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2013.02.002

van de Pol, J., Brindley, S., & Higham, R. J. E. (2017). Two secondary teachers’ understanding and classroom practice of dialogic teaching: a case study. Educational Studies, 43(5), 497–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2017.1293508

Wilkinson, I. A. G., Reznitskaya, A., Bourdage, K., Oyler, J., Glina, M., Drewry, R., Kim, M-Y., &Nelson, K. (2017). Toward a more dialogic pedagogy: changing teachers’ beliefs and practices through professional development in language arts classrooms. Language and Education, 31(1), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2016.1230129


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493