Impact on Teaching: Consistent Knowledge Development, Reflection and Practice

Abha Singh

Abstract


Application of professional knowledge is developed and practiced through teacher experiences and reflection. If we want to understand the practices of teachers of the gifted in classroom, we need to know how teachers of the gifted develop their professional knowledge as active practitioners and what diverse factors lead to their own professional knowledge in their unique situations. The teacher is one of the most important factors in providing high quality of education. Gifted education is no exception. Teachers of gifted students should know how to work with diverse student populations and students with special needs. This research is a case study of two earlier career teachers in gifted education participating in professional development. We focused on how teachers’ needs combine with practicum experience result in individual unique professional knowledge. The results are as follows. The first, even though they are both beginning teachers of the gifted, their development phases as teachers of the gifted were different depending on their previous experience. The second, there different previous experience and practicum experience determined the direction and degree of the development of professional knowledge. The third, unique contexts are different from regular teacher, especially, isolation was a big barrier for their development. The last, their development was different due to their passion about teaching gifted students and continuous reflection on their practice and students reaction were strong motives for the development of their professional knowledge.

 


Keywords


Knowledge; Practical knowledge, Experience,Interest,Reflection,Application

Full Text:

PDF

References


Beijaard, D., Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (1999). Evaluation of story-line methodology in research on teacher's practical knowledge. Studies in Educational Evaluation, Vol. 25, 47-62.

Beijaard, D., Verloop, N. (1996). Assessing teacher's practical knowledge. Studies in Educational Evaluation, Vol. 22, 275-286.

Cashion, M., Sullenger, K., 2000, ‘Contact us next year’: Tracing teachers’ use of gifted practices, Roeper Review, Vol. 23(1), 18-21.

Connelly, F. M., Clandinin, D. J., Ming, F. H. (1997). Teachers' personal practical knowledge on the professional knowledge landscape, Teaching and teacher education, Vol. 13(7), 665-674.

Druva, C.A. and Anderson, R.D. (1983). Science teachers’ characteristics by teacher behavior by student outcomes: A meta-analysis of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Vol. 20(5). 467-469.

Eick, C., Dias, M., (2005). Building the authority of experience in communities of practice: The development of pre-service teachers’ practical knowledge through co-teaching in inquiry classrooms. Science Education, Vol. 89(3), 470-491.

Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, Vol. 103, 1013–1055.

Fenstermacher, G.D. (1994) The knower and the known: The nature of knowledge is research on teaching. Review of Research on teaching, Vol. 20, 1-54.

Gagné, F. (2003). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. In N. Colangelo& G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed.), pp. 60-74. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Goldhaber, D.D., and Brewer, D. J. (2000) Does teacher certification matter? High school certification status and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol. 22, 129-145.

Johnsen, S. K., Haensly, P. A., Ryser, G. R., & Ford, R. F. (2002). Changing general education classroom practices to adapt for gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46(1), 45-63.

Kagan, D. M.(1992), Professional growth among pre-service and beginning teachers, Review of Educational Research, Vol. 62(2), 129-169.

Kwakman, 2003, Factors affecting teachers’ participation in professional learning activities, Teaching and Teacher Education, Volume 19, Issue 2, February 2003, Pages 149-170.

Loughran, J. J., Effective reflective practice: In search of meaning in learning about teaching, Journal of teacher Education, Vol. 53(1), 2002, 33-43

Lynn, Susan K. (2002). The winding path: Understanding the career cycle of teachers. The Clearing House, March/April, 179-182.

Schon, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

Monk, D. (1994), Subject area preparation of secondary mathematics and science teachers and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 13(2), 125-142.

Steffy, B. E., Wolfe, M. P, A. 2001, Life-cycle model for career teachers, Kappa Delta Pi Record, 16-19.

Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education, the role of teachers' practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol.38 (2), 137-158.

Wenglingsky, H. (2002). How school matter. The link between teacher classroom practices and student academic performance. Education Policy Analysis Archives. Vol. 10(12).

Westerman, D.A. (1991) Expert and novice teacher decision making. Journal of teacher education, Vol. 42, 292-305.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493