Postgraduate Science Students’ Impressions and Experiences of Online Pedagogical Practices: Implications for Technology-Enhanced Pedagogy

Sam Ramaila, Lydia Mavuru

Abstract


This study explores the postgraduate science teachers’ conceptions and experiences of online pedagogical practices in diverse school contexts. Embracing technology-enhanced pedagogy remains a key strategic imperative within the context of evolving pedagogical benefits associated with the advent of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR). As key agents of educational change, science teachers face the key imperative to harness the pedagogical affordances of online platforms with a view to realizing the achievement of envisaged educational outcomes. Furthermore, research studies on online teaching have predominantly focused on technological aspects and very little on their impact on humans.  The empirical investigation adopted a qualitative case study design and involved 20 purposively selected postgraduate science students from diverse school contexts in South Africa. Data were collected through the administration of an open-ended survey questionnaire and semi-structured interviews. Key findings emanating from the empirical investigation indicated that postgraduate science teachers’ coherent adoption of appropriate online pedagogical strategies was largely hampered by a lack of technological resources and inadequate professional capacity to implement online teaching and learning in diverse school contexts. Sustainable teacher professional development opportunities on the utilization of virtual digital platforms ought to be provided with a view to enabling postgraduate science teachers to harness the pedagogical affordances of online teaching and learning. 

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.1.7


Keywords


pedagogical practices; science teacher conceptions; science teacher experiences; technology-enhanced pedagogy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adams-Prassl, A., Boneva, T., Golin, M., & Rauh, C. (2020). Inequality in the impact of the coronavirus shock: Evidence from real time surveys. Journal of Public Economics, (189), 104245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104245

Amnesty International. (2020). Broken and unequal: State of education in South Africa. Amnesty International.

Baum, J. A. C., & K. B. Dahlin. (2017). Aspiration performance and railroads' patterns of learning from train wrecks and crashes. Organization Science, 18(3), 368–385. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0239

Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544-559. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573

Bayne, S., 2014. What's the matter with 'technology-enhanced learning? Learning, Media and Technology, 40(1), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2014.915851

Celikoz, N., Erisen, Y., & Sahin, M. (2019). Cognitive learning theories with emphasis on latent learning, Gestalt and Information Processing Systems. Journal of Education and Instructional Studies in World, 9(3), 18-33.

Ching, Y.H., Hsu, Y.C., & Baldwin, S. (2018). Becoming an online teacher: An analysis of prospective online instructors’ reflections. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 29(2), 145–168. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/181339/

Creswell, J. (2014). Research design. Qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods approach (4th ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.

Das, R.C., & Meredith, D.P. (2021). Factors affecting effective online teaching transition in Asian universities during COVID-19 crisis. Project: Learning through RLD World.

Etikan, I., Musa, S.A., & Alkassim, R.S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Gillett-Swan, J. (2017). The challenges of online learning: Supporting and engaging the isolated learner. Special Issue: Business Management, 10(1), 20-30.

González, C. (2010). What do university teachers think eLearning is good for in their teaching? Studies in Higher Education, 35(1), 61-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070902874632

Goodyear, P., Salmon, G., Spector, M., Steeples, C., & Tickner, S. (2001). Competences for online teaching: A special report. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(1), 65-72.

Govender, N., & Khoza, S. (2017). Technology in education for teachers. In L. Ramrathan, L. Le Grange, & P. Higgs (Eds.), Education studies for initial teacher development. Cape Town: Juta.

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27 March.

Kaur, N., & Bhatt, M.S. (2020). The face of education and the faceless teacher. Horizon Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 2(S), 39-48.

Khoza, S. (2019). 2 lecturers’ reflections on curricular spider web concepts as transformation strategies. In C.L. Scott & E.N. Ivala (Eds.), Transformation of higher education institutions in post-apartheid South Africa, (15). Routledge.

Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2014). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: What is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 6–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.770404

Lederman, D. (2020). Will shift to remote teaching be boon or bane for online learning. Inside Higher Ed, 1-27. https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/article/2020/03/18/most-teaching-going-remote-will-help-or-hurt-online-learning

Mishra, I., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Mitchell, J. E. (2020). How do we think about labs and practical skills in an online context? In: Gibbs, B., & Wood, G. C., (Eds.), Emerging stronger: Lasting impact from crisis innovation. Godalming: Engineering Professors’ Council, 35.

Moyles, J., Adams, S., & Musgrove, A. (2002). Brief No: RB363, Study of pedagogical effectiveness in early learning. Anglia Polytechnic University.

Mpungose, C. (2018). Exploring lecturers’ reflections on the use of Moodle to teach physical science modules at a South African university Unpublished PhD thesis]. University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban. (214581960).

Oh, C. (2003). Information communication technology and new university: A view of e-learning. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 585, 134-153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716202238572

Orlando, J., & Attard, C. (2015). Digital natives come of age: The reality of today’s early career teachers using mobile devices to teach mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28, 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13394-015-0159-6

Picciano, A. G. (2017). Theories and frameworks for online education: Seeking an integrated model. Online Learning, 21(3), 166–190. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i3.1225

Rucker, R., & Downey, S. (2016). Faculty technology usage resulting from institutional migration to a new learning management system. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 19(1).

Salmon, G. (2014). Learning innovation: A framework for transformation. European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 17(1), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2014-0031

Sari, T., & Nayir, F. (2020). Challenges in distance education during the (Covid-19) pandemic period. Qualitative Research in Education, 9(3), 328-360. http://dx.doi.org/10.17583/qre.2020. 5872

Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411

Turnbull, D., Chugh, R., & Luck, J. (2021). Transitioning to E-Learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: How have higher education institutions responded to the challenge? Education and Information Technologies, 26, 6401–6419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10633-w

Venkatesh, V., & Davies, F. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Science, 27, 451–481. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb01822.x

Veal, W. R., & MaKinster, J. G. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge taxonomies. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3(4).

Verloop, N., Van Driel, J., & Meijer, P. (2001). Teacher knowledge and the knowledge base of teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 441–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(02)00003-4

Williams, K. C., Cameron, B. A., & Morgan, K. (2012). Supporting online group projects. NACTA Journal, 56(2), 15–20.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493