STEM Education in Malaysia towards Developing a Human Capital through Motivating Science Subject

Fazilah Razali, Umi Kalthom Abdul Manaf, Ahmad Fauzi Mohd Ayub

Abstract


This paper focuses on the motivational factor in learning science encompassing the elements of self-efficacy, self-determination, intrinsic, grade, and career. These factors identified from previous research have a direct influence on the conception of careers related to Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) among students. This study is a quantitative study using two surveys: Motivational Science Questionnaire (MSQ II) and career interest in STEM from the STEM Student Questionnaire (S-STEM). The questionnaire was modified and tailored to the purpose of this investigation. The objective of this research is to determine motivation as the main factor in science to develop students’ interest in a STEM career among secondary students in Malaysia. A total of 419 Form Four students were the respondents of this study. The results show that motivation of indirect science learning can influence the development of Form 4 students’ interest in STEM careers. The data were analyzed using the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) method which is in line with the self-determination theory to determine the strong influence of motivation on students’ career. The result shows a very high influence of motivation towards science with a significantly high variance of 51% on the development of interest in STEM-related careers among Malaysian students.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.5.25


Keywords


STEM; science curriculum; structural equation modelling (SEM); careers; Malaysia

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adegboyega, L. O. (2018). Influence of Achievement Motivation on Nigerian Undergraduates` Attitude towards Examination. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1116a

Aytekin, I., Erdil, O., Erdoğmuş, N., & Akgün, A. E. (2016). Academicians’ career capital and career satisfaction: The mediation effect of research productivity. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16, 1921–1945. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2016.6.0412

Awang, Z. (2015). Structural Equation Modeling Using AMOS. MPWS Rich Publication.

Beerenwinkel, A., & von Arx, M. (2016). Constructivism in Practice: an Exploratory Study of Teaching Patterns and Student Motivation in Physics Classrooms in Finland, Germany and Switzerland. Research in Science Education, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9497-3

Bergeron, L., & Gordon, M. (2015). Establishing a STEM Pipeline: Trends in Male and Female Enrollment and Performance in Higher Level Secondary STEM Courses. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(10), 44-57. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9693-7

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. (4th Edition). United States of America: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-Determination Theory in Work Organizations : The State of a Science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108

Duschl, R. A. (2019). Learning progressions: framing and designing coherent sequences for STEM education. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1, 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0005-x

Fazilah, R., Umi, K. A. M, Othman, T., & Siti A. H. (2020). Motivation to Learn Science as a Mediator between Attitude towards STEM and the Development of STEM Career Aspiration among Secondary School Students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8, 138-146. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081318

Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322.

Glynn, S. M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science motivation questionnaire II: Validation with science majors and nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1159–1176. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20442

Guan, M., Capezio, A., Restubog, S. L. D., Read, S., Lajom & Li, M. (2016). The role of traditionality in the relationships among parental support, career decision-making self-efficacy and career adaptability. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 94(2), 114–123. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb. 2016.02.018

Hair, J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.

Hair, J., Gabriel, M., & Patel, V. (2014). Amos Covariance-Based Structural Equation Modeling (CB-SEM): Guidelines on Its Application as a Marketing Research Tool. Brazilian Journal of Marketing, 13(2), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.5585/remark.v13i2.2718

Halim, L. (2018). STEM Education: Issues and Way Forward, STEM Education in Malaysia (pp. 37-58). Department of Higher Education, Ministry of Higher Education: Malaysia.

Hamjah, S. H., Ismail, Z., Rasit, R. M., & Rozali, E. A. (2011). Methods of increasing learning motivation among students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 18, 138–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.021

Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural Equation Modelling : Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78635-883-720161011

Hora, M. T., & Oleson, A. K. (2017). Examining study habits in undergraduate STEM courses from a situative perspective. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0055-6

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit Indices in Covariance Structure Modeling : Sensitivity to Underparameterized Model Misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.424

Ibrahim, N. N., Ayub, A. F. M., Yunus, A. S. M., Mahmud, R., & Bakar, K. A. (2019). Effects of higher-order thinking module approach on pupils` performance at primary rural school. Malaysian Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 13(2), 211-229. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n2p494

Implementation Guide for Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) in Teaching and Learning (2016). Curriculum Development Division Malaysia: Malaysia.

Khodabakhszadeh, H., Hosseinia, M., Abedi Moghadam, H., & Ahmadi, F. (2018). EFL Teachers ’ Creativity and Their Teaching`s Effectiveness : A Structural Equation Modelling Approach. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11116a

Khong, H., Hassan, N. H., & Ramli, N. (2017). Motivation and Gender Differences in Learning Spanish as a Foreign Language in a Malaysian Technical University. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 14(2), 59–83. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2017.14.2.3

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling (Vol. 156). New York: Guillford Press. http://doi.org/10.1038/156278a0

Lee, J. (2017). Influence of Career Motivation on Science Learning in Korean High-School Students. Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 8223(5), 1517–1538. http://doi.org/10.12973/ eurasia.2017.00683a

Leung, A. (2020). Boundary crossing pedagogy in STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00212-9

Li, Y., Wang, K., Xiao, Y., & Froyd, J. E. (2020). Research and trends in STEM education: a systematic review of journal publications. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00207-6

McFadden, J., & Roehrig, G. (2020). Missed expectations: teacher and coach tensions at the boundary of STEM integration in an elementary classroom. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 2, 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-020-00021-8

Nguyen, T. T., & Deci, E. L. (2016). Can it be good to set the bar high ? The role of motivational regulation in moderating the link from high standards to academic well-being. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 245–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.12.020

Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446802800128

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. R. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd Edition). New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662169501900308

Olafsen, A. H., Niemiec, C. P., Halvari, H., Deci, E. L., & Williams, G. C. (2017). On the dark side of work : a longitudinal analysis using self-determination theory. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(2), 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432x.2016.1257611

Dare, E. A., Ellis, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2018). Understanding science teachers’ implementations of integrated STEM curricular units through a phenomenological multiple case study. International Journal of STEM Education, 5, 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0101-z

Ismail, R., Mahfodz, N. D., & Sulaiman, N. (2016). Tahap dan penentu indeks modal sosial di Malaysia. Kajian Malaysia, 34(2), 101–121. http://dx.doi.org/10.21315/km2016.34.2.5

Reeve, E. M., Roehrig, G. H., & Moore, T. J. (2014) The need for STEM teacher education development. In S. L. Green (Ed.) STEM education: how to train 21st century teachers. New York: Science Publishers

Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Modelling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results : A Review. The Journal of Education Research, 99(6), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.3200/joer.99.6.323-338

Sekaran, U. (2013). Research Methods for Business A Skill Building Approach. (Third, Ed.) Research methods for business, 65(4). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Sheldrake, R. (2016). Confidence as motivational expressions of interest, utility, and other influences: Exploring under-confidence and over-confidence in science students at secondary school. International Journal of Educational Research, 76, 50–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.12.001

Soni, A., & Kumari, S. (2015). The Role of Parental Math Anxiety and Math Attitude in Their Children’s Math Achievement. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(19). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9687-5

Zeynep, K. U., Dokme, I., & Unlu, V. (2016). Adaptation of the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Career Interest Survey (STEM-CIS) into Turkish. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 7(63), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2016.63.2


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493