Adopting a Hexagonal Inter-Activity Model for Integrating Digital Technologies in South African Secondary Schools
Abstract
The study investigated how Digital Technologies (DT) are integrated at South African public schools. Only one official who oversees DT integration in schools, eight principals, eight DT coordinators, and 300 teachers from selected schools were purposefully chosen for the study. There were 24 teachers and one district facilitator who participated in in-person interviews. The survey questionnaire was completed by 191 teachers. Quantitative data was analysed using Microsoft Excel and displayed as frequencies and percentages. The interview responses were recorded, transcribed, analysed, and presented in narrative descriptions, verbatim. The findings indicate that the teachers lack the necessary abilities to incorporate DT into teaching and learning activities and had little training on how to use DT for teaching. The results suggest that while DT policies exist, the schools have not yet achieved a satisfactory level of implementation. To solve the present, the researchers advise implementing the hexagonal interactivity model of Digital Technology Teacher Professional Development (DTTPD). The following aspects may be enhanced by this model: The most promising approaches are included in the model, including a team-based approach (division of labour) and continuous training that prioritises real-world application for the community/schools; 1. The availability of adequate training regarding the use of DT in the curriculum; 2. Effective DTTPDP planning; 3. DT support (technical and resource); 4. The teachers must be aware of how technology may enhance teaching and learning processes rather than merely obtaining theoretical training without practical support, which will result in a knowledge implementation gap in the field.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.4.20
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahmad, M., & Wilkins, S. (2024). Purposive sampling in qualitative research: A framework for the entire journey. Quality & Quantity, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-02022-5
Ajideh, P., Zohrabi, M., & Jahanbakhsh, A. A. (2021). Study Quality in Quantitative L2 Research: A Path Analysis on the Perceptions of Iranian Published Authors. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 9(1), 97-123. https://doi.org/10.30479/jmrels.2020.14296.1760
Akram, H., Yingxiu, Y., Al-Adwan, A. S., & Alkhalifah, A. (2021). Technology integration in higher education during COVID-19: An assessment of online teaching competencies through technological pedagogical content knowledge model. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 736522. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.736522
Awidi, I. T., & Paynter, M. (2024). An evaluation of the impact of digital technology innovations on students’ learning: Participatory research using a student centred approach. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29(1), 65-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-022-09619-5
Bell, E., Harley, B., & Bryman, A. (2022). Business research methods. Oxford university press.
Calvo, E., & de la Cova, E. (2023). Qualitative coding: inducing and deducing. In A Qualitative Approach to Translation Studies (pp. 55-86). Routledge.
Chen, H., & Baptista Nunes, M. (2023). Overview and Selection of Research Methodology and Methods. In Professional Empowerment in the Software Industry through Experience-Driven Shared Tacit Knowledge: A Case Study from China (pp. 47-85). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
Choi, D., Chung, C. Y., Seyha, T., & Young, J. (2020). Factors affecting organizations’ resistance to the adoption of blockchain technology in supply networks. Sustainability, 12(21), 8882. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218882
Chowdhury, A., & Shil, N. C. (2021). Thinking ‘qualitative’ through a case study: Homework for a researcher. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 5(2), 190-210. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/11280
Department of Education. (2007). Guidelines for Teacher Training and Professional Development in ICT.
Ellis, J. L., & Hart, D. L. (2023). Strengthening the Choice for a Generic Qualitative Research Design. Qualitative report, 28(6). https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.5474
Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2021). From mediated actions to heterogenous coalitions: four generations of activity-theoretical studies of work and learning. Mind, culture, and activity, 28(1), 4-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2020.1806328
Erviana, V. Y., Ghufron, A., & Retnawati, H. (2023). Validity and Reliability of IoJEPD Model Instruments to Improve Elementary School Teacher Competence. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 13(2), 200-206. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.02.24
Faber, J. M., Feskens, R., & Visscher, A. J. (2023). A best-evidence meta-analysis of the effects of digital monitoring tools for teachers on student achievement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 34(2), 169-188. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2022.2142247
Fernandes, G. W. R., Rodrigues, A. M., & Ferreira, C. A. (2020). Professional development and use of digital technologies by science teachers: A review of theoretical frameworks. Research in Science Education, 50, 673-708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9707-x
Gawali, R. B. (2023). Research methodology and statistical methods. Academic Guru Publishing House.
Golzar, J., Noor, S., & Tajik, O. (2022). Convenience sampling. International Journal of Education & Language Studies, 1(2), 72-77. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijels.2022.162981
Good, K. D. (2020). Bring the world to the child: Technologies of global citizenship in American education. MIT Press.
Gustafsson, M., & Nonkenge, K. (2025). Basic Education Policy in South Africa: From 1994 to now: Policy Paper 33. ERSA Working Paper Series, 28-28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.71587/b86hqv54
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable operations and computers, 3, 275-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
Haßler, B., Bennett, G., & Damani, K. (2021). Teacher professional development in subSaharan Africa: Equity and scale. In Embedding Social Justice in Teacher Education and Development in Africa, 18-44. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429341212
Huang, R., Adarkwah, M. A., Liu, M., Hu, Y., Zhuang, R., & Chang, T. (2024). Digital Pedagogy for Sustainable Education Transformation: Enhancing Learner-Centred Learning in the Digital Era. Frontiers of Digital Education, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44366-024-0031-x
Hunter, S. B., & Rodriguez, L. A. (2021). Examining the demands of teacher evaluation: time use, strain and turnover among Tennessee school administrators. Journal of Educational Administration, 59(6), 739-758. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-07-2020-0165
Ivankova, N. V., & Clark, V. L. P. (2023). Teaching mixed methods research to address diverse learners' needs: pedagogical strategies and adaptations. In Handbook of Teaching and Learning Social Research Methods, 85-105. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800884274.00015
Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. B. (2024). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Sage publications.
Kirui, S. K. (2023). Selected socio-Technical Issues Influencing Effective use of ICT in the Management of Public Secondary schools in Uasin Gishu County, Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, UoK).
Kurt, G. (2021). Technology-mediated tasks in the young learners’ EFL classroom. Elementary Education Online, 20(1). http://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2021.01.031
Majumdar, S. (2009). Modelling ICT Development in Education. UNESCO-UNEVOC, International Centre, Bonn, Germany.
McCarthy, A. M., Maor, D., McConney, A., & Cavanaugh, C. (2023). Digital transformation in education: Critical components for leaders of system change. Social sciences & humanities open, 8(1), 100479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100479
McMillan, T. C. (2024). Qualitative Descriptive Study: Middle School Teachers’ Descriptions of Their Preparation to Teach Middle School (Doctoral dissertation, Grand Canyon University).
Mercader, C. (2020). Explanatory model of barriers to integration of digital technologies in higher education institutions. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 5133-5147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10222-3
Moila, O., Mji, A., & Simelane-Mnisi, S. (2022). Selected pre-service teachers’ experiences on educational technology integration into teaching and learning activities during teaching practice at some schools in South Africa. In INTED2022 Proceedings (pp. 10585-10588). IATED. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2022.0851
Ndomondo, E. (2024). Instructional resources for innovative history teaching and learning in Tanzania secondary schools: exploring availability and utilization. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11(1), 2382526. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2382526
Ploettner, J., & Tresserras Casals, E. (2016). An interview with Yrjö Engeström and Annalisa Sannino on activity theory. http://dx.doi.org/10.5565/rev/jtl3.709
Riazi, A. M., Rezvani, R., & Ghanbar, H. (2023). Trustworthiness in L2 writing research: A review and analysis of qualitative articles in the Journal of Second Language Writing. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 2(3), 100065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100065
Roefs, E. C., Oosterheert, I. E., Leeman, Y. A., van der Veld, W. M., & Meijer, P. C. (2024). Investigating ‘Presence in teaching’: explicating the transition from qualitative studies to a survey instrument. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 47(3), 260-276. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2023.2281318
Santos, R. D. F., Santos, B. F. D. O., Fernandes, V. M., Caldas, L. D., Baldo, T. D. O., & Dominguez, G. C. (2021). Validity and reliability of a trigonometry-based method for the measurement of tooth movement on digital models. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, 26(03), e2119148. https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.26.3.e2119148.oar
TaylorA, P. R., & MarinoB, M. C. (2024). Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching. JALT, 7(2), 110.
Valverde-Berrocoso, J., Fernández-Sánchez, M. R., Revuelta Dominguez, F. I., & SosaDíaz, M. J. (2021). The educational integration of digital technologies preCovid19: Lessons for teacher education. PloS one, 16(8), e0256283. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256283
Wu, K., Tran, M. H., Petersen, E., Koushik, V., & Szafir, D. A. (2023). Data, data, everywhere: Uncovering everyday data experiences for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-17). https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581204
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 1694-2116
p-ISSN: 1694-2493