Middle School Teachers’ Knowledge and Use of Comprehension Strategies in Discipline Instruction

Elsa R. Barron, William H. Rupley, David Paige, William Dee Nichols, Janet Nichols, Ricardo Lumbreras

Abstract


This mixed method study investigated the total minutes 6 Social Studies and 6 English-Language Arts seventh grade-teachers taught and used comprehension strategies in their discipline area teaching. Three 45-minute observations of each teachers were used to determine reading comprehension strategies taught by individual teachers. Measures of teachers acquired reading comprehension strategy knowledge were compiled through focused interviews and a questionnaire. Reported practices and knowledge were compared to the observations of their classroom instruction.  Interview and questionnaire data were analyzed using coding to identify patterns, themes, and repetition of words or key words, and use of phrases or sentences that reveal similarities of participants’ strategy instruction.  Data revealed all 12 teachers spent only 89 minutes on comprehension strategy instruction, representing 5.5% of their total instructional time. Forty-two percent of the teachers indicated that they received training from a State Region Education Service Center, college and university courses, and district initiatives.  

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.17.10.1


Keywords


education, strategy instruction, informational text learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Berg, B. L. (2007). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Berliner, D. (1988). The development of expertise in pedagogy (Report No. ISBN-0-89333-053-1). Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED298122)

Bryant, D. P., Ugel, N., Thompson, S., & Hemff, A. (1999). Instructional strategies for content-area reading instruction. Intervention in School & Clinic, 34, 293-304. 57(2), 59-69. doi: 10.1080/1045988X.2012.664581

Cecil, N.L., Gipe, J.P., & Merrill, M. (2014). Literacy in grades 4-8. Best practices for a comprehensive program. Scottsdale, AZ: Holcomb Hathaway.

Common Core State Standards Initiative (2010). Common Core State Standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: CCSSO & National Governors Association.

Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1997). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology, 33(6), 934-945.

Davis, F. B. (1941). Fundamental factors of comprehension in reading. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA

Diesen, D. (2014). Situation model: A framework to study reading comprehension. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Department of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University

Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61, 239-264.

Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What Research Has to Say about reading instruction, (3rd ed.) (pp. 205-242). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Fowler, D., & Frey, J. (2000). Teaching phonics in the literature-based classroom. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers, Inc..

Grimes, S. (2004). The search for meaning. School Library Journal, 50(5), 48-52.

Guthrie, J. T., & Klauda, S.L. (2014). Effects of Classroom Practices on Reading Comprehension Engagement, and Motivations for Adolescents. Reading Research Quarterly, 49 (4), 387-416.

Hall-Kenyon, K.M., & Black, S. (2010). Learning from expository texts: Classroom-based strategies for promoting comprehension and content knowledge in the elementary grades. Topics in Language Disorders, 30, 339-349.

Heilman, A. W., Blair, T. R., & Rupley, W. H. (2002). Principles and practices of teaching reading (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.

Hirsch, E. D., Jr. (2003). Reading comprehension requires knowledge – of words and the world American Educator, Spring, 10-29.

Hollingsworth, J., & Ybarra, S. (2009). Explicit direct instruction: The power of the well-crafted, well-taught lesson. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Jetton, T., Rupley, W.H., &Wilson, V.L. (1995). Comprehension of narrative and expository texts: The role of content, domain, discourse, and strategy knowledge. In K. Hinchman, D.J. Leu, & C.K. Kinzer (Eds.), Perspectives on literacy research and practice 44th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference. Chicago, IL: NRC, pp. 197-204

Kintsch, W. (2004). The construction-integration model of text comprehension and its implication for instruction. In R. B. Ruddell & N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed.) (pp. 1270-1328). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Landis, J.R. & Koch, G.G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1): 159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310

Mahwah, Rupley, W. H. (2005). TQG Classroom Observation Form. Unpublished manuscript. College of Education and Human Development, Department of Teaching, Learning, & Culture, Texas A&M University.

Martin, K.L., Buelow, S.M., Hoffman, J.T. (2016). New teacher induction: Support that impacts beginning middle-level educators. Middle School Journal, 47(1), 4-12. doi: 10.1080/00940771.2016.1059725

McLaughlin, M. (2012). Reading Comprehension: What every teacher needs to know. The Reading Teacher, 65, 432-40.

Ministry of Education. (2008). A Study of Students' Transition from Primary to Secondary Schooling. Wellington: Research Division.

Muijselaar, M. M. L., Swart, N. M., Steenbeek-Planting, E. G., Verhoeven, L., & de Jong, P. F. (2017). Developmental relations between reading comprehension and reading strategies, Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(3), 194-209. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2017.1278763

National Assessment of Educational Progress (2015). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 2015 Reading Assessment. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/

National Middle School Association (2006). Success in the middle: A policymaker’s guide to achieving quality middle level education. Westerville, OH: National Middle School Association.

Ness, M. (2007). Reading comprehension strategies in secondary content-area classrooms. Phi Delta Kappan, 89(3), 229-231. doi: 10.1177/003172170708900314

Neufeld, P. (2005). Comprehension instruction in content area classes. The Reading Teacher, 59, 302-312.

O’Brien, D.G., Moje, E.B., & Stewart, R. (2001). Exploring the content of secondary literacy: Literacy in people’s everyday school lives. In E.B. Moje & D.G. O’Brien (Eds.), Constructions of literacy: Studies of teaching and learning in and out of the secondary classrooms (pp. 105-124). New York, NY: Routledge.

Paige, D. D., Smith, G., Rasinski, V. C., Rupley, W. H., Magpuri-Lavell, T., Nichols, W. D. (2018). The Journal of Educational Research.

Perakyla, A. (2005). Analyzing talk and text. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.), pp. 869-886. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Pittman, P. & Honchell, B. (2014). Literature discussion: Encouraging reading interest and comprehension in struggling middle school readers. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 10(2), 119-133.

Rosenshine, B. (1997). Advances in research on instruction. In J. W. Lloyd, E. J., Kameanui, & D. Chard (Eds.), Issues in education students with disabilities (pp. 197-221).

Rupley, W. H., & Slough, S. (2010). Building prior knowledge and vocabulary in science in the intermediate grades: Creating hooks for learning. Literacy Research and Instruction, 49, (2), 99-112.

Sam D, P., & Rajan, P. (2013). Using graphic organizers to improve reading comprehension skills for the middle school ESLl students. English Language Teaching, 6(2), 155-170. doi: 10.5539/elt.v6n2p155

Shanahan, T. & Shanahan C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rething content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78 (1), pp. 40-59. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101

Shanahan, T. (2012). The common core ate my baby and other urban legends. Educational Leadership, 70(4), 10-16.

Snow, C. E., & Educational Resources Information Center (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension/RAND Reading Study Group; Catherine Snow, chair. RAND, Science & Technology Policy Institute; U.S. Dept. of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Educational Resources Information Center.

Stockard, J. (2014). Merging the Accountability and Scientific Research Requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act: Using Cohort Control Groups†Quality and Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 47(2013), pp. 2225-2257,

Taylor, D. (2007). Fostering engaging and active discussions in middle school classrooms. Middle School Journal, 39(1), 54-59.

Taylor, L. & Parsons, J. (2011). Improving Student Engagement. Current Issues in Education, 14(1). Retrieved fromhttp://cie.asu.edu/

Texas Education Agency (2016). Snapshot 2016 District Detail. Retrieved from http://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/cgi/sas/broker

U. S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2015 Reading Assessment.

Unrau, N.J., & Quirk, M. (2014). Reading motivation and reading engagement: Clarifying commingled conceptions. Reading Psychology, 35(3), 260-284. doi: 10.1080/02702711.2012.684426

Woolley, G. (2011). Reading comprehension: Assisting children with learning difficulties. Springer Science + Business Media. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-1174-7_2


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493