Enhancing Legal English Skills for Law Students through Simulation-based Activities

Thanh-Huong Nhac

Abstract


Legal English, a sub-type of English for Specific Purposes (ESP), is in demand for legal practitioners in a new area of global integration. Teaching legal English has been seen as a complicated yet interesting process due to its complex features (Kamolidinovna, 2021). Consequently, several modern and innovative teaching methods are proposed to facilitate students to strengthen their legal English skills. This empirical paper focalizes on law students’ viewpoints on the benefits of Simulation-based Activities (SbAs) in the legal English course; explores the efficiency of SbAs on students’ legal English aspects development; at the same time, it also reveals students’ obstacles when partaking in such activities.   In order to achieve these aims, the study made use of a mixed-research approach with the assistance of the data collection instruments, namely survey questionnaires, interviews, paper-based tests and performance-based tests. The results revealed that the participants expressed the favorable perspectives towards the significance of SbAs in their legal English skills enhancement shown through high Mean values (M>=3.40). Also, integrating SbAs into teaching legal English brought about positive effects on students’ motivation, critical thinking, research and other soft skills despite a number of obstacles during the application process. Additionally, the values Sig.2-tailed tests of all variables indicate the statistical difference in students’ performance of the control and treatment groups. Accordingly, SbAs are highly recommended to effectively instruct learners to fulfill their legal English course properly.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.9.29


Keywords


Legal English skills; Simulation-based Activities (SbAs); efficiency; law students

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amirbayeva, D. (2021). Enhancing the Acquisition of Legal English through Role play. Journal for Research Scholars and Professionals of English Language Teaching. 5(27). https://www.jrspelt.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Dana-Legal-English.pdf

Archer, C. & Miller, M. (2011). Prioritizing Active Learning: An Exploration of Gateway Courses in Political Science. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44(2), 429-434. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096511000291

Asal, V. & Elizabeth L. B. (2006). Creating Simulations for Political Science Education. Journal of Political Science Education, 2 (1), 1–18. https: //doi.org/10.1080/15512160500484119

Bagchi, P. (2021). Innovative Pedagogical Practices for Teaching Legal English. International conference on best innovative teaching Strategies (ICON-BITS). Pilani, Rajasthan, India

Baranowski, Michael K., & Kimberly A. Weir. (2015). Political Simulations: What We Know, What We Think We Know, and What We Still Need to Know. Journal of Political Science Education 11 (4), 391–403.

Carmines, E.G., & Zeller, R.A. (1979). Reliability and Validity Assessment. SAGE Publications, Inc., http://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985642

Chernikova, O., Heitzmann, N., Stadler, M., Holzberger, D., Seidel, T., & Fischer, F. (2020). Simulation-based Learning in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 90(4), 499-541. http://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320933544

Corrada, R.L. (2022). Teaching a Hybrid Administrative Law Simulation Class Using Furassic Park. Journal of Legal Education, 71(2), 282-310. https://jle.aals.org/home/vol71/iss2/4/

Daly, Y.M. & Higgns, N. (2011). The place and Efficacy of Simulations in Legal Education: A Preliminary Examination. All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 3(2), 58.1-58.20. http://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishe-j/article/view/00058

D’Amato, A. (1987). The Decline and Fall of Law Teaching in the Age of Student Consumerism. Journal of Legal Education, 37, 461-494.

Egmnazarova, F. A. (2021). Role-playing games as a method of teaching foreign languages. Central Asian Research Journal for Interdisciplinary studies. 1(2). 15-20.

Edward, F. K. (2018). Undergraduate Moot Court: Student Expectations and Perspectives. American Political Science Association, 190-193. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096517001925

Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Sodian, B., Hussmann, H., Pekrun, R., Neuhaus, B., Dorner, B., Pankofer, S., Fischer, M., Strijbos, J,-W., Heene, M., & Eberle, J. (2014). Scientific reasoning and argumentation: Advancing and interdisciplinary research agenda in education. Frontline Learning Research, 2(2), 28-45. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v2i2.96

Frasson, C., & Blanchard, E.G. (2012). Simulation-Based Learning. In Seel, N.M. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (pp. 3076-3080). Boston, MA: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_129

Goga-Vigaru, R. P. (2015). Challenges in Teaching legal English and Efficient Methods of Evaluating Romanian Students at the Faculty of Law and Public Administration. Conference Proceedings, SlovakEdu. Retrieved from https://www.slovakedu.com/publications/clear2015-conference-proceedings/a05/

Jones, J.D & Barrett, C.E. (2017). Simulation as a Classroom Teaching Method. I-manager’s Journal on School Educational Technology. 12(4), 49-53. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1269378.pdf

Hair, J. F., Hollingsworth, C. L., Randolph, A. B., & Chong, A. Y. L. (2017). An updated and Expanded Assessment of PLS- SEM in Information Systems Research. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(3), 442–458.

Kamolidinovna, S. K. (2021). Modern and Interactive Methods of Teaching legal English. Current Research Journal of Philological Sciences. 2(12). 190-194.

Kostikova, I., Holubnycha, L., Shchokina, T., Soroka, N., Budianska, V., & Marykivska, H., (2019). A role-playing Games as a Means of Effective Professional English Teaching. Amazonia Investiga, 8(24). 414-425. Retrieved from https://dspace.nlu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/17757/1/414-425.pdf

Krois-Lindner, A., & Translegal®. (2006). International Legal English - A Course for Classroom or Self-study use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Knerr, C.R., Sommerman, A.S. & Rogers, S.K. (2001). Undergraduate Appellate Simulation in American Colleges. The Journal of Legal Studies Education, 19(1), 27-62. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277839190_The_Place_and_Efficacy_of_Simulations_in_Legal_Education_A_Preliminary_Examination

Nhac, T.H. (2021). Challenges in Learning Legal English from Students’ Perspective at Hanoi Law University. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 3(3), 177-188. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v2i3.675

Nhac, T.H. (2022). Difficulties in Legal Reading Comprehension to English-majored Students at Hanoi Law University. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 38(5). 92-104. https://doi.org/10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4735

Northcott, J. (2013). Legal English. In B. Paltridge & S. Starfield (Eds.), The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes (pp. 210-226). London: Wiley-Blackwell.

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (3rd Ed). (1994). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

MacLeod, G.A. (1963). Creative Problem-Solving – For Lawyers? Journal of Legal Education, 16, 198-202.

Maranville, D. (2001). Infusing Passion and Context into the Traditional Law Curriculum Through Experiential Learning. Journal of Legal Education, 51, 51-74.

Moizer, J., Lean, J., Towler, M., & Abbey, C. (2009). Simulations and games: Overcoming the barriers to their use in higher education. Active Learning in Higher Education, 10(3), 207–224. http://doi.org/10.1177/1469787409343188

Mykytiuk, S. (2013). Role-playing in Teaching Legal English for Law students. Global English-Global Decisions: XVIII TESOL. Ukraine National Conference, Sevastopol. http://dspace.nlu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/2159

Philips, E. (2012). Law Games – Role play and Simulation in Teaching Legal Application and Practical Skills: A case study. Compass: The Journal of Learning and Teaching at the University of Greenwich, 5, 1-14.

Pillai. N, Vijayamohanan & Rjumohan, A. (2000). Reliability, Validity and Uni-Dimensionality: A Primer. MPRA Munich Personal RePEc Archive.

Ramsden, P. (Ed). (2003). Learning to teach in Higher Education. London & New York. Routledge Falmer.

Ringel, L. (2004). Designing a Moot Court: What to Do, What Not to Do, and Suggestions for How to Do It. PS: Political Science & Politics, 37 (3), 459–65.

Russell, C. & Shepherd, J. (2010). Online Role-play Environments for Higher Education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(6), 992-1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01048.x

Saliu, B. (2013). Challenges for Learners/ Teachers in the ESP Course for Legal Studies. SEEU Review, 9(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.2478/seeur-2013-0001

Sharifi, A., Ghanizadeh, A., & Jahedizadeh, S. (2017). The Effects of Simulation on Middle School Students’ Perceptions of Classroom Activities and their Foreign Language Achievement. A Mixed- methods Approach. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 9(3), 667-680. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1134179.pdf

Snape, J., & Watt, G. (2005). How to Moot: A Student Guide to Mooting. Oxford University Press.

Turgunboy, S. U. (2022) Teaching English to Law Students: Essential Skills for Future Lawyers in Uzbekistan. International Scientific Journal. 1(8).1444-1447. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/teaching-english-to-law-students-essential-skills-for-future-lawyers-in-uzbekistan

Shellman, S. M., & Turan, K. (2006). Do Simulations Enhance Student Learning? An Empirical Evaluation of an IR Simulation. Journal of Political Science Education 2 (1), 19–32. http://doi.org/10.1080/15512160500484168

Verner, S. (n.d.). Order in the Court. Get Your Students Talking Passionately and Logically with a Mock Trial. Retrieved from https://busyteacher.org/11497-court-classroom- mock-trial-get-students-talking.html

Weidman, J., & Coombs, D. (2016). Dodging Marshmallows: Simulations to Teach Ethics. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 57(7), 14-18. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1096235

Whinery, L.H. (1955). The Problem Methods in Legal Education. West Virginia Law Review, 58 (2), 144-168. Retrieved from https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/wvlr/vol58/iss2/4

Zarik, H. & Cecille, E. S. (2003). ILSA Guide to International Moot Court Competition. Washington, D.C: International Law Institute.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493