Flipped Direct Instruction (FDI): A New Practicum Learning Model in Vocational Education

Akrimullah Mubai, Ambiyar Ambiyar, Dedy Irfan, Mohamad Sattar Rasul

Abstract


The Flipped Direct Instruction (FDI) learning model was introduced as a new learning model for practicum learning. It was developed to mitigate the limitations of the Direct Instruction (DI) model in improving vocational education graduates’ competencies. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine the formation of the FDI learning model. This research uses an exploratory sequential mixed methods design with Mile and Huberman methods and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). The FDI learning model is formed through conceptual, theoretical, hypothetical, and final modeling stages. Research data were obtained through document analysis and Focus Group Discussion (FGD). FGD was conducted with 7 experts as the research sample and non-test instruments were used. The result of this study is an FDI learning model formed from several theories including Joyce (2003), Cooper (2012), Ktoridou (2018), and Indrajit (2021). The FDI model consists of an orientation phase, procedure-based simulation phase, case-based simulation phase, structured practice phase, guided practice phase, and independent practice phase. Each phase obtained CFA values of 0.464, 0.492, 0.292, 0.009, 0.016, and 0.018. All values are below 2, revealing that the FDI model has a goodness-of-fit-model criteria. The FDI model is presented as a contribution to the development of science and as a new learning model option recommended for vocational education. In the future, this research will contribute to the evaluation of the FDI learning model in measure its level of practicality, effectiveness, and impact on model application.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.7.29


Keywords


Flipped Direct Instruction; New Learning Model; Vocational Education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmad, N. A., Rasul, M. S., Othman, N., & Jalaludin, N. A. (2022). Generating Entrepreneurial Ideas for Business Development. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(9), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14094905

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A Taxonomy For Learning, Teaching, and Assessing a Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Education Objectives. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Ashari, Z. H. M., Azman, N., & Rasul, M. S. (2019). Factors predicting career choice among Malaysian students in skills-based training institutions. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 19(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-018-9366-5

Aziz, F., Quraishi, U., & Kazi, A. S. (2018). Factors behind classroom participation of secondary school students (A gender based analysis). Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(2), 211–217. https://doi.org/10.13189/ ujer.2018.060201

Aziziy, Y. N., Sulhadi, Marwoto, P., & Iswari, R. S. (2020). Designing e-learning based independent learning activity unit through virtual worksheet: Improving student’s 4Cs. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1567(4), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/4/042103

Azwar, S. (2019). Reabilitas dan Validitas Edisi 4 [Reliability and Validity 4th Edition]. Pustaka Pelajar.

Budiman, A., Samani, M., Rusijono, R., Setyawan, W. H., & Nurdyansyah, N. (2020). The Development of Direct-Contextual Learning: A New Model on Higher Education. International Journal of Higher Education, 10(2), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v10n2p15

Central Bureau of Statistics Indonesia (BPS). (2022). Keadaan Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia Agustus 2022 [Indonesia’s State of Employment August 2022]. https://www.bps.go.id/publication/2022/12/07/a64afccf38fbf6deb81a5dc0/keadaan-angkatan-kerja-di-indonesia-agustus-2022.html

Chamidy, T., Degeng, I. N. S., & Ulfa, S. (2020). The effect of problem-based learning and tacit knowledge on problem-solving skills of students in computer network practice course. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(2), 691–700. https://doi.org/10.17478/JEGYS.650400

Cooper, S., Cant, R., Porter, J., Bogossian, F., McKenna, L., Brady, S., & Fox-Young, S. (2012). Simulation based learning in midwifery education: A systematic review. Women and Birth, 25(2), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.wombi.2011.03.004

Courtney, N., Poulsen, C., & Stylios, C. (2015). Case Based Teaching and Learning for the 21st Century. Libri Publishing.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research : Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Pearson Education, Inc.

Dehham, S. H., & Albayati, W. A. (2021). The Impact of Using Flipped Learning on the Performance of Iraqi EFL Fifth Preparatory Students in Reading Comprehension. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry (TOJQI), 12(7), 11783–11795.

Flynn, R. J., Marquis, R. A., Paquet, M. P., Peeke, L. M., & Aubry, T. D. (2012). Effects of individual direct-instruction tutoring on foster children’s academic skills: A randomized trial. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(6), 1183–1189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.01.036

Forneris, S. G., Neal, D. O., Tiffany, J., Kuehn, M. B., Meyer, H. M., Blazovich, L. M., Holland, A. E., & Smerillo, M. (2015). Enhancing clinical reasoning through simulation debriefing: A multisite study. Nursing Education Perspectives, 36(5), 304–310. https://doi.org/10.5480/15-1672

Glogger-Frey, I., Fleischer, C., Grüny, L., Kappich, J., & Renkl, A. (2015). Inventing a solution and studying a worked solution prepare differently for learning from direct instruction. Learning and Instruction, 39, 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.05.001

Gurses, A., Dogar, C., & Gunes, K. (2015). A New Approach for Learning: Interactive Direct Teaching Based Constructivist Learning (IDTBCL). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197(February), 2384–2389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.296

Hartanto, S., Huda, A., Wulansari, R. E., Mubai, A., Firdaus, & Shalehoddin. (2022). The Design of Android-Based Interactive Lean Manufacturing Application to Increase Students’ Work Skill in Vocational High School: The Development and Validity. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 16(13), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.3991/ ijim.v16i13.30595

Holmes, A. G. D., Tuin, M. P., & Turner, S. L. (2021). Competence and competency in higher education, simple terms yet with complex meanings: Theoretical and practical issues for university teachers and assessors implementing Competency-Based Education (CBE). Educational Process: International Journal, 10(3), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.22521/EDUPIJ.2021.103.3

Huda, A., Azhar, N., Almasri, A., Wulansari, R. E., Mubai, A., Sakti, R. H., Firdaus, F., & Hartanto, S. (2021). Augmented Reality Technology as a Complement on Graphic Design to Face Revolution Industry 4.0 Learning and Competence: The Development and Validity. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(5), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.3991/ ijim.v15i05.20905

Jackson, C. R. (2018). Validating and Adapting the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) for STEM Courses at an HBCU. AERA Open, 4(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418809346

Joyce, B., & Weil, M. (2003). Models of Teaching Fifth Edition. Asoke K. Ghosh.

Ktoridou, D., Doukanari, E., Epaminonda, E., & Karayiannis, A. (2018). Case-based learning: Offering a premier targeted learning experience for technology management students. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, Educon, 2018-April, 1781–1786. https://doi.org/10.1109/ EDUCON.2018.8363450

Maksum, H., & Purwanto, W. (2019). Model Pembelajaran Pendidikan Vokasi Otomotif (PVO) [Automotive Vocational Education (PVO) Learning Model]. UNP PRESS.

Meyers, L. S., Glenn Gamst, & Guarino, A. J. (2013). Applied Multivariate Research Design and Interpretation. SAGE Publications, Inc.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook - Third edition. SAGE Publications.

Nofriansyah, D. (2020). DICKY : A New Learning Model Which Is A Combination Of Artificial Intelligence And ICT In Vocational Education. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 9 No 3.

Nuris, D. M., & Istyaningputri, C. M. (2021). The Factors That Influence the Independent Learning of Accounting Students at a Vocational High School. KnE Social Sciences, 2021, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v5i8.9347

Patandean, Y. R., & Indrajit, R. E. (2021). Flipped Classroom Membuat Peserta Didik Berpikir Kritis, Kreatif, Mandiri dan Mampu Berkaloborasi [Flipped Classroom Makes Learners Think Critically, Creatively, Independently and Able to Collaborate]. Andi Offset.

Paulsen, K. S., Ungermand, S., Engermann, M. H., Faria, M., Tree, D. J., O’Neill, L., Hladiš, R., & Gadney, G. (2019). Storytelling Beyond The Screen Creating (K. S. Paulsen (ed.)). Filmby Aarhus & VIA Film & Transmedia.

Ridho, S. (2019). Pembelajaran Berbasis Kasus [Case-Based Learning]. IPAsiapatakut. https://ipasiapatakut.blogspot.com/2019/11/pembelajaran-berbasis-kasus-case-based.html

Riyanti, A., & Parulian, N. A. (2023). The Effect of Communication and Decision-Making on Teacher Performance in Junior High School. Journal on Education, 05(04), 11498–11502. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/ joe.v5i4.2096

Rohmadi, A. (2015). Case Based Reasoning Untuk Pemilihan Kegiatan Organisasi Mahasiswa [Case Based Reasoning for Student Organization Activity Selection]. Jurnal Momentum, 17(2), 39–43.

Rüütmann, T., & Kipper, H. (2011). Teaching strategies for direct and indirect instruction in teaching engineering. 2011 14th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning, ICL 2011 - 11th International Conference Virtual University, VU’11, 107(September), 107–114. https://doi.org/ 10.1109/ICL.2011.6059556

Salminen-Tuomaala, M. (2019). Development of Multiprofessional Simulation-based Education in South Ostrobothnia, Finland. Athens Journal of Health & Medical Sciences, 6(3), 143–156. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.30958/ajhms.6-3-2

Smaldino, Lowther, & Russell. (2014). Instructional Technology and Media for Learning (Tenth). Pearson Education Limited.

Staker, H., & Horn, M. B. (2012). Classifying K-12 Blended Learning. Innosight Institute, May, 1–22.

Stein, J., & Graham, C. R. (2020). Essentials for blended learning: A standards-based guide. In Essentials for Blended Learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203075258-7

Stockard, J., Wood, T. W., Coughlin, C., & Rasplica Khoury, C. (2020). All students can succeed: A half century of research on the effectiveness of Direct Instruction. Lexington Books.

Tambunan, H., Sinaga, B., & Widada, W. (2021). Analysis of teacher performance to build student interest and motivation towards mathematics achievement. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(1), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i1.20711

Tasrif, E., Saputra, H. K., Kurniadi, D., Hidayat, H., & Mubai, A. (2021). Designing Website-Based Scholarship Management Application for Teaching of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) in Decision Support Systems (DSS) Subjects. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(9), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i09.23513

Vanek, J., Simpson, D., & Goumas, J. (2020). IDEAL Distance Education and Blended Learning Handbook, 7th Edition. EdTech Books. https://edtechbooks.org/ ideal_dl_handbook

Viinikka, K., Ubani, M., Lipiäinen, T., & Kallioniemi, A. (2019). 21st Century Skills and Finnish Student Teachers’ Perceptions about the Ideal RE Teacher Today and in the Future. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(8), 75–97. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.8.5

Warju, W., Ariyanto, S. R., Soeryanto, S., Hidayatullah, R. S., & Nurtanto, M. (2020). Practical Learning Innovation: Real Condition Video-Based Direct Instruction Model in Vocational Education. Journal of Educational Science and Technology (EST), 6(1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.26858/est.v6i1.12665

Warwick, P., Vrikki, M., Vermunt, J. D., Mercer, N., & van Halem, N. (2016). Connecting observations of student and teacher learning: an examination of dialogic processes in Lesson Study discussions in mathematics. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 48(4), 555–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0750-z

Winarno, S., Andono, P. N., Muthu, K. S., & Ling, L. S. (2021). The effectiveness of mDPBL as a multimedia-based learning approach. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(6), 2946–2955. https://doi.org/10.18844/ cjes.v16i6.6479

Winarno, S., Muthu, K. S., & Ling, L. S. (2018). Direct Problem-Based Learning (DPBL): A Framework for Integrating Direct Instruction and Problem-Based Learning Approach. International Education Studies, 11(1), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v11n1p119

Winarsih, S., Sangka, K. B., & Octoria, D. (2019). The effect of direct instruction and problem based learning on millennial. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2194(December 2019). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5139873

Yulianto, T., Pramudya, I., & Slamet, I. (2019). Effects of the 21st Century Learning Model and Problem-Based Models on Higher Order Thinking Skill. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4, 749–755. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.629084

Zayyadi, M., Nusantara, T., Hidayanto, E., Sulandra, I. M., & Sa’Dijah, C. (2020). Content and pedagogical knowledge of prospective teachers in mathematics learning: Commognitive. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(1), 515–532. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.642131


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493