Increasing Support and Job Satisfaction for Program Administrators at the Postgraduate Medical Education Program at the University of Ottawa: The Program Administrator’s Perspective

Dr. D. Puddester, Colla Jean MacDonald, H. Summers, Dr. A. Chaput, Dr. L. Wiesenfeld, Dr. D. Archibald

Abstract


Abstract. Background: Realizing Program Administrators (PAs) are crucial to the success of the postgraduate medical education (PGME) program, the PGME office at the University of Ottawa conducted a needs analysis to (a) identify training opportunities PAs felt would support them in being effective at meeting role expectations including supporting Program Directors (PDs) and (b) gather information from PAs to guide the PGME office in taking positive action toward increasing satisfaction with services and resources. Methods: A mixed methods approach involved collecting and analyzing data from online surveys and follow-up qualitative interviews. Data analysis was conducted using the constructs of the W(e)Learn framework (content, media (delivery), service, structure and outcomes). Results: PAs identified the following professional development topics they said would benefit them: Human Resources; Communication and Conflict Management Courses; Career Development; Evaluation; Policy; Multigenerational Workforces; and Best Technological Practices of Relevance to PAs. The PAs also identified several recommendations for how the PGME office could facilitate them effectively carrying out their roles and responsibilities. Conclusions: An effective form of support is offering convenient, relevant professional development to help employees meet role expectations. A well-designed professional development program should begin with a needs analysis to determine stakeholder needs with regard to relevant content, preferred delivery methods, service issues and course structure, in order to ensure desired learner outcomes. 


Keywords


Postgraduate medical education; program administrators; needs analysis; professional development; program improvement

Full Text:

PDF

References


Altrichter, H., Posch, P., & Somekh, B. (1996). Teachers investigate their work; An introduction to the methods of action research. London, UK: Routledge.

Bogdan, R. & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Bryman, A. (2007). Barriers to integrating quantitative and quantitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 8-22.

Creswell, J. W. & Plano Clark, V. L. (2010). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Graff, J. C. (2014). Mixed methods research. In: Hall, H. R. & Roussel, L. A., eds. Evidence based practice: An integrative approach to research, administration and practice. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Halcomb, E. & Hickman, L. (2015). Mixed methods research. Nursing Standard, 29(32), 41-47.

Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.

Kjaer, N. K., Steenstrup, A. P., Pedersen, L. B., & Halling, A. (2014). Continuous professional development for GPs: experience from Denmark. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 90(1065), 383-387.

MacDonald, C. J., Archibald, D., Montpetit, M., McKeen, M., Leith-Gudbranson, D., Hogue, R., & Rivet, C. (2013). The Design, Delivery and Evaluation of an Essential Teaching Skills Course for Preceptors in Family. International Journal of Medical Education. (4), 146-154.

MacDonald, C.J., Milligan, J., Jeji, T., Mathias, K., Kellam, H., Gaffney, J. (2015). Caring for persons with spinal cord injury: A mixed study evaluation of eLearning modules designed for family physicians. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 14(1), 39-62. http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/issue/view/24

MacDonald, C. J., Stodel, E. J., Thompson, T-L., & Casimiro, L. (2009). W(e)Learn : A framework for online interprofessional education. International Journal of Electronic Healthcare. 5(1), 33-47.

MacDonald, C.J. & Thompson, T. L. (2005). Structure, content, delivery, service, and outcomes: Quality e-learning in higher education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 6(2). Available online: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/237/321

Merriam, S. B. (2001). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. (Rev. ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

O'Donoghue, T., & Punch K. (2003). Qualitative educational research in action: Doing and reflecting. London, UK: Routledge.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Pluye, P., Gagnon, M-P., Griffiths, F., & Johnson-Lafleur, J. (2009). A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in mixed studies reviews. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46(4), 529-546.

Puddester, D. MacDonald, C.J.; Clements, D., Gaffney, C.J. & Wiesenfeld, (2015). Designing faculty development to support the evaluation of resident competency in the intrinsic CanMEDS roles: practical outcomes of an assessment of program director needs; BMC Medical Education DOI 10.1186/s12909-015-0375-5

Strudsholm, T., Meadows, L. M., Vollman, A. R., Thurston, W. B. E., & Henderson, R. (2016). Using mixed methods to facilitate complex, multiphased health research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 15(1), 1609406915624579.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493