Demo Lessons and Peer Observation to Enhance Student Teachers’ Competencies and Exit Profiles

Agnes Orosz, Uvaldo Recino, Maria Caridad Ochoa

Abstract


The research study was carried out at an Ecuadorian teacher training university and aimed at bridging the gap between the exit profile requirements of student teacher graduates and the syllabus of the subject called Teaching language skills. The objective was to establish how far demo lessons (such as microteaching sessions) can facilitate the training of student teachers, and prepare them for authentic teaching-learning situations at the beginning of their careers. A qualitative paradigm based on Action Research (AR) methodology was used in two consecutive cycles employing class observation, reflection and survey questions for feedback. In the first cycle, student teachers, who gave demo lessons on how to improve listening skills, were given feedback by the class teacher and their peers. In the second cycle, which aimed at mitigating the weaknesses identified by the observers and the class teacher in the first cycle, student teachers gave demo lessons on improving speaking skills. After the two cycles were completed, the 26 participants of the module were asked to provide responses to a survey questionnaire which specifically explored their perceptions on how far the demo lessons had helped them develop their professional competencies. The researchers conclude that observations of and reflections on the demo lessons benefited not only the class teacher, who was able to improve her methodology, but it also helped the student teachers since they could improve their teaching strategies and techniques to teach English. The student teachers’ answers to the survey questions proved that the activities associated with the demo lessons were considered effective for the development of their professional competencies as future teachers of English.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.6.32


Keywords


demo lesson; peer observation; teaching language skills; language teacher competencies; student teacher reflection

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amobi, F. A. (2005). Preservice teachers’ reflectivity on the sequence and consequences of teaching actions in a microteaching experience. Teacher Education Quarterly, 32(1), 115-130. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ795309.pdf

Anderson, J. (2020). Key concepts in ELT: Reflection. ELT Journal, 74(4), 480-483. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccaa039

Ba?atur, S. (2015). Dismayed or enchanted: ELT students’ perceptions towards microteaching. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 770-776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.610

Bedir, H. (2019). Pre-service ELT teachers’ beliefs and perceptions on 21st century learning and innovation skills (4Cs). Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 15(1), 231-246. https://www.jlls.org/index.php/jlls/article/view/1263/457

Bell, N. D. (2007). Microteaching: What is it that is going on here? Linguistics and Education, 18(1), 24-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2007.04.002

Burns, A., Edwards, E., & Ellis, N. J. (2022). Sustaining Action Research: A practical guide for institutional engagement. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429265273

Cambridge Assessment English. (2018). Framework competency statements. UCLES. https://www.cambridgeenglish.org/images/172992-full-level-descriptors-cambridge-english-teaching-framework.pdf

Cochran-Smith, M., & Villegas, A. M. (2016). Research on teacher preparation: Charting the landscape of a sprawling field. In D. H. Gitomer, & C. A. Bells (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (5th ed., pp. 439-547). AREA.

Department of Education and Training. (2018). Peer observation, feedback and reflection: A practical guide for teachers. State of Victoria Department of Education and Training.

Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the education process (2nd ed.). D. C. Heath.

Efron, S. E., & Ravid, R. (2013). Action research in education: A practical guide. The Guilford Press.

European Commission. (2013). Supporting teacher competence development for better learning outcomes. https://www.id-e-berlin.de/files/2017/09/TWG-Teacher-Competences-final2.pdf?fbclid=IwAR1u4iqUihWWy71PepxeVOHXI7gm8O-_4MG7AeEJN3fudoybg54v564fHmc

Farrell, T. S. C. (2016). Promoting teacher reflection in second language education: A framework for TESOL professionals. Routledge.

Hayden, H. E., Rundell, T. D., & Smyntek-Gworek, S. (2013). Adaptive expertise: A view from the top and the ascent. Teaching Education, 24(4), 395-414. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2012.724054

He, C., & Yan, C. (2011). Exploring authenticity of microteaching in pre-service teacher education programmes. Teaching Education, 22(3), 291-302. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2011.590588

Kamimura, T., & Takizawa, T. (2012). The effects of peer feedback on student teachers’ teaching demonstrations in an EFL teacher-training course in Japan. CORE, 5-23. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/71787981.pdf

König, J., Bremerich-Vos, A., Buchholtz, C., & Glutsch, N. (2020). General pedagogical knowledge, pedagogical adaptivity in written lesson plans, and instructional practice among pre-service teachers. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 52(6), 800-822. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2020.1752804

MAXQDA. (2022). Feature overview. https://www.maxqda.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/MAXQDA-features.pdf

Modelo Pedagógico UNAE. [Pedagogical Model of UNAE, National University of Education, Ecuador]. (n.d.) http://repositorio.unae.edu.ec/bitstream/56000/1180/1/M_B73-73-98.pdf

Nation, I. S. P., & Newton, J. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL listening and speaking. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891704

Odo, D. M. (2022). An Action Research investigation of the impact of using online feedback videos to promote self-reflection on the microteaching of preservice EFL teachers. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 35, 327-343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-021-09575-8

Ögeyik, M. C. (2009). Attitudes of the student teachers in English Language Teaching programs towards microteaching technique. English Language Teaching, 2(3), 205-212. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v2n3p205

Önal, A. (2019). An exploratory study on pre-service teachers’ reflective reports of their video-recorded microteaching. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 15(3), 806-830. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.631520

Pardede, P. (2020). Integrating the 4Cs into EFL integrated skills learning. Journal of English Teaching, 6(1), 71-85. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v6i1.190

PINE Major Project (2018). Management of innovative and creative didactic techniques that facilitate the teaching-learning processes of English in the students of basic education and high school. UNAE.

Richards, J. C. (1998). Teaching in action: Case studies from Second Language Classrooms. TESOL.

Richards, J. C., & Farrell, T. S. C. (2005). Professional development for language teachers: Strategies for teacher learning, (pp. 85-97). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667237

Rismiyanto, & Suryani, F. B. (2020). Peer and real student microteaching: The EFL student teachers’ perception. In Proceedings of the 1st Bandung English Language Teaching International Conference, (pp. 434-438). SciTePress. https://doi.org/10.5220/0008219604340438

Sa’ad, T. U., Sabo, S., & Abdullahi, A. D. (2015). The impact of micro-teaching on the teaching practice performance of undergraduate agricultural education students in college education. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(26), 109-115. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1077458.pdf

Sagban, A. A., AlMumar, H. A., & Hashim, Z. F. (2021). The effect of microteaching technique of Iraqi EFL student teachers on their teaching performance and attitudes. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(4), 1984-1997. https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.144

Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. Jossey-Bass.

Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Research, 57(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411

Smith, R., & Rebolledo, P. (2018). A Handbook for Exploratory Action Research. https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/teacheng/files/pub_30510_BC%20Explore%20Actions%20Handbook%20ONLINE%20AW.pdf

Solanki, M., & Patel, A. (2017). Micro-teaching for teaching practice performance. International Journal of Research in All Subjects in Multi Languages, 5(5), 14-17. http://www.raijmr.com/ijrsml/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/IJRSML_2017_vol05_issue_05_eng_04.pdf

Takkaç Tulgar, A. (2019). The effects of microteaching practices on pre-service EFL teachers’ professional self-efficacy development. Erzincan Üniversitesi E?itim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(2), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.17556/erziefd.519041

Tican, C., & Deniz, S. (2019). Pre-service teachers’ opinions about the use of 21st century learner and 21st century teacher skills. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 181-197. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.1.181

Ulvik, M., Riese, H., & Roness, D. (2018). Action research – connecting practice and theory. Educational Action Research, 26(2), 273-287. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2017.1323657

Williams, M. (1989). A developmental view of classroom observation. English Language Teaching Journal, 43(2), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/43.2.85

Yan, C., & He, C. (2017). Pair microteaching: An unrealistic pedagogy in pre-service methodology courses? Journal of Education for Teaching, 43(2), 206-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2017.1286783


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493