Peer Scaffolding among Primary ESL Learners’ Writing Task: Learners’ Behaviors and Triggering Factors

Tinialishel Laie Gostine Tinggie, Kim Hua Tan, Nazri Muslim, Lim Kar Keng

Abstract


Human interaction and support are key to students’ learning. In English as a second language (ESL) settings, peer scaffolding reinforces the traditional teacher–learner interaction. A lack of peer interaction among students, which is also a product of the COVID-19 pandemic, has resulted in young learners becoming overly reliant on teachers. This concern is a factor in hindering learners’ writing development. Inspired by the sociocultural perspective, this study employed a qualitative research design to explore the types of scaffolding behaviors among young learners. The analysis is based on the Taxonomy of Language Functions and what triggers these behaviors among primary ESL learners during classroom writing tasks. Data from 10 recordings of audiovisual materials and interviews were collected from 30 Year 6 primary school students and were analyzed using thematic analysis. The data analysis showed that scaffolding behaviors occurred continuously throughout each writing stage. The findings revealed that the preferred scaffolding behavior among learners was questioning. Eliciting questions was the most frequent type of inquiry that was applied during peer scaffolding. Results highlight the triggering factors that influenced scaffolding behaviors, which were learners’ level of competency, personalities, and accessibility to L1. This approach can be used as an alternate strategy for teaching writing because of its substantial impact on the writing ability of ESL students. The findings would provide a clear direction for ESL practitioners and learners to acknowledge the significance of learners’ behaviors and factors during peer scaffolding in assisting their development in writing attainment.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.3.12


Keywords


sociocultural theory; peer scaffolding; ESL writing; scaffolding factors; scaffolding behaviors

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdollahzadeh, M., & Behroozizad, S. (2015). On the importance of A socio-culturally designed teaching model in an EFL writing classroom. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 4(4), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.4p.238

Aliyu, M. M., & Yakubu, H. (2019). Implications of the sociocultural theory on students’ reading comprehension. Bulletin of Advanced English Studies, 3(2), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.31559/baes2019.3.2.3

Azman, H. (2016). Implementation and Challenges of English Language Education Reform in Malaysian Primary Schools. 3L: Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.17576/3l-2016-2203-05

Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3

Baraketi, F. (2019). The impact of extroversion–introversion on EFL oral performance in the Tunisian context. TAYR Quarterly Journal, 6, 8–28.

Chairinkam, J., & Yawiloeng, R. (2021). Peer Scaffolding Behaviors in English as a Foreign Language Writing Classroom. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 7(4), 226–234. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.522.2021.74.226.234

Chen, C.-H., & Law, V. (2016). Scaffolding individual and collaborative game-based learning in learning performance and intrinsic motivation. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 1201–1212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.010

Chew, S. Y., & Ng, L. L. (2021). THE INFLUENCE OF PERSONALITY AND LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY ON ESL LEARNERS’WORD CONTRIBUTIONS IN FACE-TO-FACE AND SYNCHRONOUS ONLINE FORUMS. Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 6(1), 199–221. https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol6iss1pp199-221

Cooper, M. M. (1986). The ecology of writing. College English, 48(4), 364–375. https://doi.org/10.2307/377264

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles.

Dong, Y., & Liu, S. (2020). Dynamic Features of Students’ Scaffolding Interaction in English Writing Class. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1006.04

Dös, B., Bay, E., Aslansoy, C., Tiryaki, B., Çetin, N., & Duman, C. (2016). An Analysis of Teachers’ Questioning Strategies. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(22), 2065–2078. https://doi.org/10.5897/err2016.3014

Elsworth, S. & Rose, J. (2017). Academy Stars 6 Pupil's Book. Malaysia.

Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. (1987). Personality and individual differences. Plenum New York, NY.

Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387. https://doi.org/10.2307/356600

Gholami Pasand, P., & Tahriri, A. (2017). Peer scaffolding in an EFL writing classroom: An investigation of writing accuracy and scaffolding behaviors. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 5(2), 147–166. https://relp.isfahan.iau.ir/article_535479_6125156887fff8a2084e9f7af9be2a5e.pdf

Graham, A., & Dooly, M. (2018). The use of L1 in student-student interactions in a collaborative learning context [Master's thesis, Autonomous University of Barcelona]. https://ddd.uab.cat/record/199301

Gul, R., Kanwal, S., & Khan, S. S. (2020). Preferences of the teachers in employing revised blooms taxonomy in their instructions. Sjesr, 3(2), 258–266. https://doi.org/10.36902/sjesr-vol3-iss2-2020(258-266)

Hanjani, A. M. (2019). Collective peer scaffolding, self-revision, and writing progress of novice EFL learners. International Journal of English Studies, 19(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes.331771

Herayati, H. (2019). THE EFFECT OF QUESTIONING TECHNIQUE IN PRE-WRITING STAGE TOWARD STUDENTS’WRITING ABILITY. Journal on Education, 1(4), 756–763. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v2i2.430

Hodges, T. S. (2017). Theoretically Speaking: An Examination of Four Theories and How They Support Writing in the Classroom. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 90(4), 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2017.1326228

Idris, M. I., Said, N. E. M., & Tan, K. H. (2020). Game-based learning platform and its effects on present tense mastery: Evidence from an ESL classroom. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(5), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.5.2

Jamali Kivi, P., Namaziandost, E., Fakhri Alamdari, E., Ryafikovna Saenko, N., Inga-Arias, M., Fuster-Guillén, D., Sirisakpanich, D., & Nasirin, C. (2021). The comparative effects of teacher versus peer-scaffolding on EFL learners’ incidental vocabulary learning and reading comprehension: A socio-cultural perspective. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 50, 1031–1047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-021-09800-4

Li, M., & Kim, D. (2016). One wiki, two groups: Dynamic interactions across ESL collaborative writing tasks. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.002

Lim, S. Y. & Tan, K. H. (2022). Teaching Descriptive Writing via Google Classroom Stream: Perception Among Year 6 Primary Students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(4), 647–657. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1204.04

Mahtari, S., Wati, M., Hartini, S., Misbah, M., & Dewantara, D. (2020). The effectiveness of the student worksheet with PhET simulation used scaffolding question prompt. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1422(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1422/1/012010

Maksi?, S., & Joši?, S. (2021). Scaffolding the development of creativity from the students’ perspective. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100835

Namasivayam, P., Singh, C. K. S., Mostafa, N. A., Janoory, L., & Abdullah, M. S. (2017). Improving ESL students’ descriptive writing through wh-question technique. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(7), 219–231. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v7-i7/3091

Nasr, M., & Namaziandost, E. (2019). The impact of topic choice on descriptive writing ability among Iranian advanced EFL learners. International Journal of English Language Studies, 1(1), 9–16. https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/ijels/article/view/112/101

Ramasamy, R. M. M., & Aziz, A. B. A. (2018). Peer assessment in writing using Frog VLE in a secondary school ESL classroom. Creative Education, 9(14), 2265. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2018.914167

Saienko, N., & Nazarenko, I. (2021). Using Speaking Frames as Scaffolding Tools to Teach University Students to Speak in ESP. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(4), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.4.6

Sari, D. M., Suparman, U., & Sinaga, T. (2018). The Effectiveness of Scaffolding Technique on Students’ Writing Analytical Expository Text. U-JET, 7(3). http://jurnal.fkip.unila.ac.id/index.php/123/article/view/15404/pdf

Selvaraj, M., & Aziz, A. A. (2019). Systematic review: Approaches in teaching writing skill in ESL classrooms. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 8(4), 450–473. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v8-i4/6564

Shin, S., Brush, T. A., & Glazewski, K. D. (2020). Patterns of peer scaffolding in technology-enhanced inquiry classrooms: application of social network analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 2321–2350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09779-0

To, J., & Panadero, E. (2019). Peer assessment effects on the self-assessment process of first-year undergraduates. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(6), 920–932. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1548559

Valadi, A., Rezaee, A., & Baharvand, P. K. (2015). The relationship between language learners’ willingness to communicate and their oral language proficiency with regard to gender differences. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 4(5), 147–153. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.5p.147

van de Pol, J., Mercer, N., & Volman, M. (2019). Scaffolding student understanding in small-group work: Students’ uptake of teacher support in subsequent small-group interaction. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(2), 206–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2018.1522258

Veramuthu, P., & Shah, P. M. (2020). Effectiveness of collaborative writing among Secondary school students in an ESL classroom. Creative Education, 11(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2020.111004

Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.

Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). Child Psychology. Psychiatry, 17, 89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x

Wu, W.-C. V., Petit, E., & Chen, C.-H. (2015). EFL writing revision with blind expert and peer review using a CMC open forum. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(1), 58–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.937442

Xin-Li, E. S., binti Yamat, H., bin Mohd Said, N. E., & Hua, T. K. (2022). Hots Questions and Narrative Writing Ability of Lower Primary Pupils in a Vernacular School. World Journal of English Language, 12(5), 148. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n5p148


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493