The Efficacy of Microteaching in a Teacher Education Programme during the Lockdown at a University in South Africa

Nosihle Veronica Sithole

Abstract


The microteaching programme is the initial phase of teacher development, and it intends to provide student teachers with a genuine experience of the teaching profession. Prior to the global COVID-19 lockdown, microteaching was conducted in a traditional face-to-face setting. However, the lockdown restrictions compelled such programmes to be carried out virtually using digital devices. Therefore, the aim of this qualitative study is to examine the efficacy of microteaching during the lockdown in a university teacher education programme. The research was conducted with two groups of Post Graduate Certificate in Education students at a university, in South Africa. Each group comprised of five members, with a totality of 10 participants. A case study research design was employed, and data were collected through observations and semi-structured interviews. An observation schedule and interview schedule were utilised to guide the accuracy of data collection. Thereafter, data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis, whereby codes and themes were developed. The findings reveal the efficacy of microteaching since all student teachers successfully completed their microteaching virtually with better marks when comparing Microteaching One and Microteaching 2. The microteaching programme was enhanced by improving the utilisation of technology resources in the programme. Student teachers’ digital skills, knowledge and critical thinking skills were enhanced. Conducting microteaching virtually also resulted in inclusive learning. It is concluded that technology resources played a vital role in the efficacy of microteaching during the lockdown. This study contributes to the literature on teacher education programmes to embrace technology utilisation in microteaching, even after the lockdown.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.2.5


Keywords


efficacy; lockdown; microteaching; teaching and learning; technology

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adarkwah, M. A. (2021). “I’m not against online teaching, but what about us?”: ICT in Ghana post Covid-19. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 1665–1668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10331-z

Arsal, Z. (2015). The effects of microteaching on the critical thinking dispositions of preservice teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 140–153. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v40n3.9

Banga, C. L. (2014). Microteaching, an efficient technique for learning effective teaching. Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies, II(XV), 2206–2211. https://oaji.net/articles/2015/1174-1421149006.pdf

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage publication.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.

Cuthbert, M. (2017). Assessing the effectiveness of microteaching during teacher preparation. European Journal of Research and reflection in Educational sciences, 5(2), 91–102. http://www.idpublications.org/

Defis, N., Glover, A., Jennings, C., Stewart, S., Wallis, R., Craggs, B., Hay, C., Linton, C., Powell, T., & Williams, A. (2022). Using video technology to support microteaching and reflection in initial teacher education. Journal of Educational Innovation, Partnership and Change, 8(1). 92–98. https://journals.studentengagement.org.uk/index.ph

Dharma, X. N., Nugroho, A. S., Sulistio, P. H., & Roiyasa, N. (2022), The effectiveness of virtual microteaching class in the COVID-19 Pandemic Time. Linguistics and English Language Teaching Journal. 10(1), 48–54.

Herrera, R. F., Vielma, J. C., & Muñoz, F. C. (2017). Microteaching: A new way to perform oral presentations by engineering students. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 19(3), 285–290. http://www.wiete.com.au/journals/GJEE/Publish/vol19no3/18-Herrera-RF.pdf

Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2014). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed approach. Sage Publication.

Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., & Graham, C. R. (2014). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. Springer Science + Business Media.

Kumar, S. S. (2016). Microteaching — An efficient technique for learning effective teaching. International Journal of Research in IT and Management, 6(8), 51–61. https://doi.org /fulltext/EJ1285602.pdf

Kusmawan, U. (2017). Online Microteaching: A multifaceted approach to teacher professional development. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 15(1), 42–56. https://doi.org/?id=EJ1144694

Malik, S., Rohendi, D., & Widiaty, I. (2018 October). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) with information and communication technology (ICT) Integration: A literature review [Paper presentation] Proceedings of the 5th UPI International Conference on Technical and Vocational Education and Training (ICTVET 2018). https://bitly.com.10.2991/ictvet-18.2019.114

McGraw-Hill. (2019). What is TPACK theory and how can it be used in the classroom. Canada. www.mheducation.ca/blog/what-is-tpack-theory-and-how-can-it-be-used-in-the-classroom/

Meyer, I. A., & Gent, P. R. (2016). The status of ICT in education in South Africa and the way forward. National Education Collaboration Trust. https://nect.org.za/publications/technical-reports/the-state-of-ict-in-education-in-south-africa/

Msimanga, M.R. (2021). The impact of micro teaching lessons on teacher professional skills: Some reflections from South African student teachers. International Journal of Higher Education, 10(2), 164–170. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v10n2p164

Oluwatoyin, O.O., & Femi, A. (2022). Assessing the effectiveness of microteaching during teacher preparation in post Covid-19 era. KWASU International Journal of Education (KIJE), 4 (1), 97–107. https://www.kije.com.ng

Otsupius, I. A. (2014). Microteaching: a technique for effective teaching. An International Multidisciplinary Journal, 8(4), 183–197. https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/afrrev.v8i4.15

Patten, M. L., & Newhart, M. (2018). Understanding research methods (10th ed.). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Punia, V., Miglani, P., & Singh, S. P. (2016). Perception of pupil-teachers regarding microteaching sessions. World Scientific News, 26, 69–77. http://www. worldscientificnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/WSN-27-2016-1-9.pdf

Rismiyanto, R., & Suryani, F. B. (2021). The best microteaching practice platform: Offline, Zoom, or WhatsApp group? Prominent: Journal of English Studies, 4(2), 81–87. https://doi.org/10.24176/pro.v4i2.6459

Santos, J. M., & Castro, R.D.R. (2021). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: Application of learning in the classroom by pre-service teachers (PST). Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100110

Sosibo, L. (2012). Exploring the views of educators and students on privileged knowledge domains in a teacher education programme: A case study. Journal of Education, 56, 139–169. https://doi.org/10.17159/2520-9868/i56a06

Thomas, J. D. (2013) Microteaching revisited: Using technology to enhance the professional development of pre-service teachers. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 86(4), 150–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655. 2013.790307


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493