Teachers’ Viewpoint of Metacognitive Strategy Instruction in Listening during Remote Teaching in Oman: Challenges and Strategies

Surya Subrahmanyam Vellanki, Saadat Mond, Zahid Kamran Khan, Lekha Gopalakrishnan Nair

Abstract


Research in second language learning has identified the absence of metacognition among learners as one of the major problems contributing to students’ inability to comprehend listening texts. Moreover, the shift to remote teaching due to COVID-19 has made it more crucial for teachers and learners to adapt to new modes of teaching and learning. This accentuates the need for effective listening strategy instruction. This study conducted at a university in Oman, is unique in two ways: first, it seeks out teachers’ perceptions of metacognitive strategy instruction in remote teaching; and second, the intervention in the form of explicit metacognitive strategy instruction is offered online. This paper presents the findings of the study, which focused on the following: teachers’ perception of students’ listening difficulties; teachers’ perceptions of metacognitive strategies and their explicit instruction; the role of metacognitive strategy awareness and instruction in improving student participation and skills in listening; challenges encountered in teaching listening during remote teaching; and overcoming challenges of teaching metacognitive strategies in remote teaching. This mixed-method study collected data through questionnaires and interviews with 10 faculty members and 75 students. The findings show that teachers face several challenges, such as time limitations, shortened semesters, unfamiliar coursebook contexts, and assessment practices. For strategy instruction, teachers utilized collaborative lesson planning and resources and virtual flipped classrooms, among others. We conclude that metacognitive strategy instruction can provide better scaffolding during listening instruction and recommends further exploration of students’ use of metacognitive strategies in other academic contexts.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.7.5


Keywords


EFL listening; listening strategies; metacognition; metacognitive strategy instruction; remote teaching

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdalhamid, F. (2012). Listening Comprehension Strategies of Arabic-Speaking ESL Learners. Master’s Dissertation, Department of English, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado. https://mountainscholar.org/bitstream/handle/10217/65198/Abdalhamid_colostate_0053N_11014.pdf?sequence=1

Al-Jahwari, M., Al Mekhlafi, A. M., Al-Barwani, T., & Abdulraheim, A. (2019). The Effect of Metacognitive Listening Strategy Instruction on Omani Grade 11 EFL Learners’ Listening Comprehension and their Metacognitive Listening Awareness. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(9), 256–275. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.9.14

Al-Issa, A. (2005b). An ideological discussion of the place & role of exams in the Omani ELT System. Paper presented at redesigning pedagogy: Research, policy, practice conference, Centre for Research in Pedagogy & Practice, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

Al-Issa, A. (2006). Language problems facing Omani learners of English. ORTESOL, (24), 19–26. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1940534266

AI-Shammari, H. G. (2020). The Impact of Strategy Instruction on Iraqi EFL Learners' Listening Comprehension and Metacognitive Strategy Use. MEXTESOL Journal, 44(4). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1311030

Bermillo, J., & Aradilla, F. J. (2022). Developing Students’ Listening Comprehension and Metacognitive Awareness through Metacognitive Process-Based Listening Instruction. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.32996/jeltal.2022.4.1.8

Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (3rd ed.). Addison-Wesley.

Bozorgian, H. & Alamdari, E. F. (2017). Multimedia listening comprehension: Metacognitive instruction or metacognitive instruction through dialogic interaction. ReCALL, 30(1), 131–152.

Bozorgian, H. (2014). The role of metacognition in the development of EFL learners’ Listening Skill. The International Journal of Listening, 28, 149–161.

Brown, S. (2011). Listening myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Buck, G. (2001). Assessing listening. Cambridge University Press.

Call, M. (1985). Auditory short-term memory, listening comprehension, and the input hypothesis. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 765–781. Retrieved from

http://0www.jstor.org.catalog.library.colostate.edu/stable/pdfplus/3586675.pdf?ac

Chamot, A. U., & El-Dinary, P. B. (1999). Children’s Learning Strategies in Language Immersion Classrooms. The Modern Language Journal, 83(3), 319–338. http://www.jstor.org/stable/330256

Chamot, A.U. (2004). Issues in language learning strategy research and teaching. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 1(1), 14–26. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237719738_Issues_in_Language_Learning_Strategy_Research_and_Teaching

Chamot, A.U. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 112–130. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190505000061

Chang, A. C., Read, J. (2007). Support for foreign language listeners: Its effectiveness and limitations. Regional Language Centre (RELC) Journal, 33(3), 375–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688207085853

Chase, B.T., Johannsen, K.L. (2012). Pathways 3: Listening, speaking and critical thinking. Heinle Cengage.

Chen, Y. (2005). Barriers to acquiring listening strategies for EFL learners and their pedagogical implications. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 8(4). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1068095.pdf

Chiang, C. S., & Dunkel, P. (1992). The Effect of Speech Modification, Prior Knowledge, and Listening Proficiency on EFL Lecture Learning. TESOL Quarterly, 26(2), 345–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587009

Cohen, A., Weaver, S., (1998). Strategies-based instruction for second language learners. In Renandya, Renandya, W.A., Jacobs, G.M. (Eds.), Learners and Language Learning, Anthology Series 39. SAMEO Regional Language Centre, Singapore, pp. 1-25.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, D. J. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Creswell, J.W. and Plano Clark, V.L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. (2nd ed.), SAGE.

Cross, J. (2011). Metacognitive instruction for helping less-skilled listeners. ELT Journal, 65(4), 408-416. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq073

De Souza, R., Parveen, R., Chupradit, S., Velasco, L. G., Arcinas, M., Tabuena, A. C., Pentang, J. T., & Ventayen, R. J. M. (2021). Language teachers’ pedagogical orientations in integrating technology in the online classroom: Its effect on students motivation and engagement. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(10), 5001-5014. https://turcomat.org/index.php/turkbilmat/article/view/5268

Dicker, C., Chamot, A. U., & O’Malley, J. M. (1994). The CALLA Handbook: Implementing the Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach. TESOL Quarterly, 28(3), 647. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587323

Dirkes, M. A. (1985). Metacognition: Students in charge of their thinking. Roeper Review, 8(2), 96–100. EJ 329 760. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783198509552944

Fahim, M., & Alamdari, E. F. (2014). Exploring the effect of the model of metacognitive instruction on the listening performance of EFL learners. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 3(6). https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsll.2014.700

Farhadi, S., Zoghi, M., & Talebi, Z. (2015). Intermediate EFL learners’ listening performance viewed in the light of metacognitive strategy instruction. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 5(3), 140-146.

Field, J. (2003). Promoting perception: Lexical segmentation in L2 listening. ELT Journal, 57(4), 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/57.4.325

Field, J. (2008). Listening in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive- developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906

Gilakjani, A. P., & Sabouri, N. B. (2016). Learners’ listening comprehension difficulties in English language learning: A literature review. English Language Teaching, 9, 123–133. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n6p123

Goh, C. C. M. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners’ listening comprehension problems. System, 28(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0346-251x(99)00060-3

Goh, C. (2002b). Learners’ self-reports on comprehension and learning strategies for listening. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 12, 46–68.

Goh, C. (2008). Metacognitive instruction for second language listening development: Theory, practice and research implications. RELC Journal, 39(2), 188–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688208092184

Goh, C., & Taib, Y. (2006). Metacognitive instruction in listening for young learners. ELT Journal, 60(3), 222–232. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccl002

Graham, S. (2017). Research into practice: Listening strategies in an instructed classroom setting. Language Teaching, 50(1), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444816000306

Greenberg, S. N & Roscoe, S. (1987). Echoic memory interference and comprehension in a foreign language. Language Learning, 38, 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1988.tb00409.x

Harding, L., Anderson, J. C., & Brunfaut, T. (2015). Diagnostic assessment of reading and listening in a second or foreign language: Elaborating diagnostic principles. Language Testing, 32(3), 317–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214564505

Hasan, A. S. (2000). Learners’ perceptions of listening comprehension problems. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 13, 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310008666595

Higgins, J. M. D. (1995) “Facilitating listening in second language classrooms through the manipulation of temporal variables.” Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Kent at Canterbury.

Khonamri, F., & Ahmadi, F. (2015). The effect of metacognitive strategy training and raising efl learners’ metacognitive knowledge on listening performance. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 19-28. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v5i1.827

Kobayashi, A. (2018). Investigating the effects of metacognitive instruction in listening for EFL Learners. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 15, 310–328.

Krashen, S. D., & Terrell, T. D. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Alemany Press.

Krishnan, K. S., Yaacob, A., & Veloo A. (2020) The Effect of Meta cognitive Strategy Training on ESL Pre-University Students’ Listening Achievement. Elementary Education Online, 19 (3), 68-76. http://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2020.03.103

Kurita, T. (2012). Issues in second language listening comprehension and the pedagogical implications. Asia Accents, 5(1), 30–44.

Lai, Y. (2009). Language learning strategy use and English proficiency of university freshmen in Taiwan. TESOL Quarterly, 43 (2), 255–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00167.x

Lee, Y. J., & Cha, K. W. (2020). Writing Listening Logs and Its Effect on Improving L2 Students’ Metacognitive Awareness and Listening Proficiency. International Journal of Contents, 16(4), 50–67. https://doi.org/10.5392/IJOC.2020.16.4.050

Lim, T. D. (2013). Analyzing Malaysian English classrooms: Reading, writing, speaking and listening teaching strategies. University of Washington. http://hdl.handle.net/1773/25020

Linang, E. R. (2005). Teachers report on the use of pre-listening activities in activating students’ prior knowledge in a Malaysian ESL classroom in Kuching. Universiti Malaysia Sarawak. http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/4195

Liu, H. (2008). A study of the interrelationship between listening strategy use, listening proficiency, and learning style. Annual Review of Education, Communication, and Language Sciences (ARECLS), 8, 84–104. https://research.ncl.ac.uk/media/sites/researchwebsites/arecls/liu_vol5.pdf.

Lotfi, G. (2012). A questionnaire of beliefs on English language listening comprehension problems: Development and validation. World Applied Sciences Journal, 16, 508–515. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.389.5194&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

Mahdavi, N., & Miri, M. (2016). Co-Shaping metacognitive awareness and developing listening comprehension through process-based instruction. International Journal of Listening, 33(1), 53-70, https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2016.1260454

Lotfi, G., Maftoon, P., & Birjandi, P. (2012). Learning to listen: Does intervention make a difference?. The Language Learning Journal, 44(1), 107-123.

Movahed, R. (2014). The Effect of Metacognitive Strategy Instruction on Listening Performance, Metacognitive awareness and Listening anxiety of Beginner Iranian EFL Students. International Journal of English Linguistics, 4(2), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v4n2p88

Murphy, J.M. (1985). An investigation into the listening strategies of ESL college students. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED278275). http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED278275.pdf

Murphy, J.M. (1986). An investigation into the listening strategies of ESL college students. Doctoral dissertation, Teachers College of Columbia University, Columbia).

Dissertation Abstracts International, 46, 2677A.

Nation, I. S. P., & Newton, J. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL listening and speaking. Routledge. https://repository.bbg.ac.id/bitstream/611/1/Teaching_ESL_EFL.pdf

Nguyen, H. & Abbott, M.L. (2016). Promoting process-oriented listening instruction in the ESL classroom. TESL Canada Journal 34(11), 72–86. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1145020.pdf

O’Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Kupper, L., & Russo, (1985a). Learning strategies used by beginning and intermediate ESL students. Language Learning, 35(1), 21–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1985.tb01013.x

O’Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., & Kupper, L. (1989). Listening comprehension strategies in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 10(4), 418–437. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/10.4.418

O’Malley, J. M. & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.

Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Heinle & Heinle.

Oxford, R. (2003). Language learning styles and strategies: An overview. Proceedings of GALA (Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition) Conference, 1-25. https://web.ntpu.edu.tw/~language/workshop/read2.pdf

Rahimirad, M., & Shams, M. R. (2014). The effect of activating metacognitive strategies on the listening performance and metacognitive awareness of EFL students. International Journal of Listening, 28,162–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2014.902315

Renandya, W. A., & Farrell, T. S. C. (2011). “Teacher, the tape is too fast!” Extensive listening in ELT. ELT Journal, 65(1), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq015

Rivera, C.K. (2018). The Effects of Metacognitive Listening Strategy Instruction on ESL Learners' Listening Motivation. Thesis and Dissertations. 7423 https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/7423

Rost, M. (2002). Teaching and researching listening. Pearson Education.

Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies: Theoretical assumptions, research history, and typology. In A.Wenden and J. Rubin (Eds). Learner strategies in language learning. Prentice Hall International, 15–30.

Rubin, J. (1994). A review of second language listening comprehension research. The Modern Language Journal, 78(2), 199-221. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02034.x

Siegel, J. (2014). Exploring L2 listening instruction: Examinations of practice. ELT Journal, 68(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct058

Siegel, J. (2015). Exploring listening strategy instruction through action research. Palgrave Macmillan.

Siegel, J., & Siegel, A. (2015). Getting to the bottom of L2 listening instruction: Making a case for bottom-up activities. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 5(4), 637-662. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2015.5.4.6

Schmidt, A. (2016). Listening journals for extensive and intensive listening practice.” English Teaching Forum, 54(2), 2–11. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1104020.pdf

Taguchi, K. (2017). Metacognitive listening strategy instruction for EFL learners. The Bulletin of the Institute of Human Sciences, Toyo University, 19, 63–83. https://www.toyo.ac.jp/uploaded/attachment/111208.pdf

Thompson, I., & Rubin, J. (1996). Can strategy instruction improve listening comprehension? Foreign Language Annals, 29(3), 331–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1996.tb01246.x

Vandergrift, L. (1997). The comprehension strategies of second language (French) listeners: A descriptive study. Foreign Language Annals, 30(3), 387–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1997.tb02362.x

Vandergrift, L. (1999). Facilitating second language listening comprehension: acquiring successful strategies. ELT Journal, 53(3), 168–176. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/53.3.168

Vandergrift, L. (2003). Orchestrating Strategy Use: Toward a Model of the Skilled Second Language Listener. Language Learning, 53(3), 463–496. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00232

Vandergrift, L. (2004). Listening to learn or learning to listen? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190504000017

Vandergrift, L. (2006). Second language listening: Listening ability or language proficiency? The Modern Language Journal, 90(1), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00381.x

Vandergrift, L. (2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40(3), 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444807004338

Vandergrift, L. (2010). Researching listening. In B. Paltridge, & A. Phakiti (Eds.), Continuum companion to research methods in applied linguistics (pp. 160–173). Continuum.

Vandergrift, L., Goh, C., Mareschal, C. J., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2006). The metacognitive awareness listening questionnaire: Development and validation. Language Learning, 56(3), 431–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00373.x

Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. M. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. New York Routledge.

Vandergrift, L., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2010). Teaching L2 Learners How to Listen Does Make a Difference: An Empirical Study. Language Learning, 60(2), 470–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00559.x

Voth, M., n.d. Action Research. [online] Miriam Voth. Available at: https://miriamvoth.weebly.com/action-research.html

Wang, L., & MacIntyre, P. (2021). Second language listening comprehension: The role of anxiety and enjoyment in listening metacognitive awareness. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 11(4), 491-515. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2021.11.4.2

Wenden, A. (1991). Learner strategies for learner autonomy: planning and implementing learner training for language learners. Prentice Hall.

Wenden, A. (1998). Metacognitive knowledge and language learning. Applied Linguistics 19(4), 515–537. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.4.515

White, G. (2008). Listening and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (Ed.), Lessons from good language learners (pp. 208–217). Cambridge University Press.

Yesilyurt, E. (2013). An analysis of teacher candidates’ usage level of meta-cognitive learning strategies: Sample of a university in Turkey. Educational Research and Reviews, 8(6), 218–225. https://academicjournals.org/journal/ERR/article-abstract/86E65A74477

Y?ld?r?m, S., Y?ld?r?m, Ö. (2016). The importance of listening in language learning and listening comprehension problems experienced by language learners: A literature review. Abant ?zzet Baysal Üniversitesi E?itim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(4), 2094–2110. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/291967


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493