The Dynamics of Design- Knowledge Construction: The Case of a Freshman Architectural-Design Studio in Egypt

Nouran Mohammed Haridy, Marwa Hassan Khalil, Ramy Bakir

Abstract


Reviewing the literature indicates a lack of studies that explicitly describe the dynamics of design-knowledge construction in architectural pedagogy. Accordingly, this study attempts to empirically explore the process of constructing design-knowledge within a freshman architectural-design studio in the Egyptian context. In the spring 2020 semester, interpretive qualitative research was initially conducted in an on-campus setting, followed by a period within an online setting, after the COVID-19 lockdown. A total of 12 students, in addition to four teaching assistants and the course instructor, were involved in this study. Multiple data-gathering tactics, such as field observations, semi-structured interviews, and document archives were employed. Conventional content analysis was adopted, in order to extract the patterns that describe the design-knowledge construction within the case under investigation. The study revealed ten themes within three categories: students’ learning activities, faculty-pedagogical strategies, and social interactions. This paper discusses one theme from each of these categories: (1) students’ recourse to self-directed learning, (2) the faculty’s coaching within the educational setting, and (3) the studio’s socio-communal cohesion. The findings of this study confirmed that the construction of design-knowledge is an integrally situated process, which cannot be studied without the presence of all its various components. Such a study presents a contribution that could inform future pedagogical initiatives which aim to create stimulating architectural learning environments in a post-pandemic reality.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.1.10


Keywords


Design education; architectural design studio; freshman students; situated learning perspective; design-knowledge construction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al Maani, D., Alnusairat, S., & Al-Jokhadar, A. (2021). Transforming learning for architecture: Online design studio as the new norm for crises adaptation under COVID-19. Open House International, 46(3), 348–358. https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-01-2021-0016

Al-Qawasmi, J. (2007). Virtualization of Architectural-Design Education in the Arab Region: Potential and Cultural Implications. Open House International, 32(2), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-02-2007-B0007

Ashton, P., & Durling, D. (2000). Doing the Right Thing Social Processes in Design Learning. The Design Journal, 3(2), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.2752/146069200789390123

Atman, C., & Bursic, K. (1996). Teaching engineering design: Can reading a textbook make a difference? Research in Engineering Design, 8(4), 240–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01597230

Bakir, R., & Alsaadani, S. (2019). Facebook Posts and Design Pedagogy: An Egyptian Case Study of Social-Media Communication in Support of an Architectural Studio. In L. G. Chova, A. L. Martínez, & I. C. Torres (Eds.), Proceedings of EDULEARN19, the 11th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (pp. 9878–9887). IATED Academy. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2019.2460

Bakir, R., Alsaadani, S., & Abdelmohsen, S. (2021). Student Experiences of Online Design Education Post COVID-19: Mixed-Methods Study. In S. Abdelmohsen, T. El-Khouly, Z. Mallasi, & A. Bannadji (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th Arab Society for Computer-Aided Architectural Design (ASCAAD) international conference 2021 (pp. 142–155). Robert Gordon University. http://ascaad.org/conference/2021/docs/proceedings.pdf

Bashier, F. (2017). Design Process-System and Methodology of Design Research. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 245(8). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/245/8/082030

Brookfield, S. D. (2009). Self-Directed Learning. In R. Maclean & D. Wilson (Eds.), International Handbook of Education for the Changing World of Work: Bridging Academic and Vocational Learning (pp. 2615–2627). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5281-1_172

Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032

Bucciarelli, L. L. (2001). Design Knowing & Learning: A Socially Mediated Activity. In C. M. Eastman, W. M. McCracken, & W. C. Newstetter (Eds.), Design Knowing and Learning: Cognition in Design Education (pp. 297–314). Elsevier Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008043868-9/50013-9

Cennamo, K., & Brandt, C. (2012). The “right kind of telling”: Knowledge building in the academic design studio. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(5), 839–858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9254-5

Chang, B. (2017). Dialogues in Promoting Knowledge Construction. Adult Education Research Conference 2017, Norman, Oklahoma. https://newprairiepress.org/aerc/2017/papers/29/

Chang, B. (2018). Patterns of Knowledge Construction. Adult Education Quarterly, 68(2), 108–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713617751174

Cross, N. (2006). Designerly Ways of Knowing. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-301-9_1

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. (2013). The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Ferreira, J. (2018). Design Conversations: An exploratory study of teacher and student interaction in the design studio [Doctor of Philosophy, Delft University of Technology]. https://doi.org/10.4233/uuid:483619ed-6ddd-459b-bc21- 830424450f8d

Goldschmidt, G., Hochman, H., & Dafni, I. (2010). The design studio “crit”: Teacher–student communication. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 24(3), 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1017/S089006041000020X

Graneheim, U. H., Lindgren, B.-M., & Lundman, B. (2017). Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: A discussion paper. Nurse Education Today, 56, 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.06.002

Greeno, J. G., Collins, A. M., & Resnick, L. (1996). Cognition and learning. In R. Calfree & D. Berliner (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 15–46). Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203053874

Heylighen, A., Bouwen, J. E., & Neuckermans, H. (1999). Walking on a thin line—Between passive knowledge and active knowing of components and concepts in architectural design. Design Studies, 20(2), 211–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00035-0

Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

Johri, A., Olds, B., & O’Connor, K. (2014). Situative frameworks for engineering learning research. In A. Johri & B. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research (pp. 47–66). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139013451.006

Jolley, V. (2013). Constructing knowledge: A pedagogical evaluation of design-based learning. UCLan Journal of Pedagogic Research, 4. https://doi.org/10.5420/ujpr.4.

Kamble, T. (2016). Information Processing: Key to Knowledge Building in Architectural Design Studio. International Education and Research Journal, 2(12), 150–153. http://ierj.in/journal/index.php/ierj/article/view/619

Khalil, M. (2021). Idea Generating Techniques in Architectural Design Education: Exploring Students’ Perceptions. International Journal of Engineering Education, 37(1), 65–85. https://www.ijee.ie/contents/c370121.html

Khan, A. R., & Thilagam, N. L. (2021). The virtual design studio and the key integrals. Open House International, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-05-2021-0113

Koh, J. H. L., Herring, S. C., & Hew, K. F. (2010). Project-based learning and student knowledge construction during asynchronous online discussion. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 284–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.09.003

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355

Lawson, B. (2004). What designers know. Elsevier/Architectural Press.

Lawson, B. (2001). The context of mind. In P. Lloyd & H. Christiaans (Eds.), Designing in Context: Proceedings of Design-Thinking Research Symposium 5 (pp. 133–148). Delft University Press.

Lotz, N., Jones, D., & Holden, G. (2015). Social engagement in online design pedagogies. In R. Vande Zande, E. Bohemia, & I. Digranes (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference for Design Education Researchers (pp. 1645–1668). Aalto University. http://oro.open.ac.uk/43592/

Lueth, P. (2008). The architectural design studio as a learning environment: A qualitative exploration of architecture design student learning experiences in design studios from first - through fourth-year [Doctor of Philosophy, Iowa State University]. https://doi.org/10.31274/rtd-180813-16991

McClean, D., & Hourigan, N. (2013). Critical Dialogue in Architecture Studio: Peer Interaction and Feedback. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 8(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.11120/jebe.2013.00004

Merriam, S. B., & Grenier, R. S. (2019). Qualitative Research in Practice: Examples for Discussion and Analysis (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Oluwatayo, A. A., Ezema, I., & Opoko, A. (2017). Development of design expertise by architecture students. Journal of Learning Design, 10(2), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v10i2.268

Papert, S. (1991). Situating Constructionism. In S. Papert & I. Harel (Eds.), Constructionism: Research reports and essays 1985-1990. Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Piaget, J. (1971). The Theory of Stages in Cognitive Development. In D. Green, M. P. Ford, & G. B. Flamer (Eds.), Measurement and Piaget (pp. 1–11). McGraw-Hill.

Picton, C., Kahu, E. R., & Nelson, K. (2018). ‘Hardworking, determined and happy’: First-year students’ understanding and experience of success. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(6), 1260–1273. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1478803

Ragheb, G. A. (2016). Assessment in Architectural Design Education Case Study: First-Year Students at Pharos University. Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 10(9), 1015–1026. https://doi.org/10.17265/1934-7359/2016.09.005

Salama, A. M. (2009). Transformative Pedagogy in Architecture and Urbanism. UMBAU-VERLAG. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003140047

Schön, D. A. (1988). Designing: Rules, types and worlds. Design Studies, 9(3), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(88)90047-6

Sopher, H. (2019). The notion of Place in design education. A situated learning model, using an immersive virtual environment [Doctor of Philosophy]. Senate of the Technikon - Israel Institution of Technology.

Sopher, H., Gewirtzman, D. F., & Kalay, Y. E. (2019). Going immersive in a community of learners? Assessment of design processes in a multi-setting architecture studio. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2109–2128. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12857

Türkkan, S., Sönmez, N., & Kürtüncü, B. (2013). Neither Individual, nor Group: A First Year Design Studio Experiment. In M. Thorne & X. Costa (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2012 ACSA International Conference (pp. 7–14). ACSA Press. https://www.acsa-arch.org/chapter/neither-individual-nor-group-a-first-year-design-studio-experiment/

Tzamir, Y., & Churchman, A. (1989). An Ethical Perspective on Knowledge in Architectural Education. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 6(3), 227–239. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43028926

Uluo?lu, B. (2000). Design knowledge communicated in studio critiques. Design Studies, 21(1), 33–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(99)00002-2

Uluo?lu, B. (1996). Representation of design Knowledge in Studio Critiques. In Ö. Akin & G. Saglamer (Eds.), Descriptive Models of Design (pp. 577–591).

van Aalst, J. (2009). Distinguishing knowledge-sharing, knowledge-construction, and knowledge-creation discourses. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(3), 259–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-009-9069-5

van Kampen, S. (2019). An Investigation into Uncovering and Understanding Tacit Knowledge in a First-Year Design-Studio Environment. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 38(1), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12171

Venkatesh, A., & Ma, C. F. H. (2021). Tacit Knowledge Construction in Studio-based Learning: A Conceptual Framework. The International Journal of Design Education, 16(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-128X/CGP/v16i01/37-53

Venkatesh, A., & Ma, C. F. H. (2019). Tacit Learning in an Extended Interior Design Studio. In N. Börekçi, D. Koçy?ld?r?m, F. Korkut, & D. Jones (Eds.), Proceedings of DRS Learn X Design 2019: Insider Knowledge (pp. 237–245). Middle-East Technical University. https://doi.org/10.21606/learnxdesign.2019.01028

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The Development of Higher Mental Processes. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4

World Health Organization. (2020, March 11). WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19—11 March 2020. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020

Yaz?c?, G., & Do?an, F. (2019). Interactive Imagery and Shared Mental Models in Design Learning. In N. Börekçi, D. Koçy?ld?r?m, F. Korkut, & D. Jones (Eds.), Proceedings of DRS Learn X Design 2019: Insider Knowledge (pp. 89–110). Middle East Technical University. https://doi.org/10.21606/learnxdesign.2019.04084

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th edn.). Sage Publishing.


Refbacks



e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493