The Implementation of Formal Assessments in Intermediate Phase Mathematics at Primary Schools in South Africa

Senzeni Sibanda, Awelani M. Rambuda

Abstract


The purpose of this research was to explore the implementation of formal assessments in intermediate phase mathematics at primary schools. The research was elicited by reports that assessment methods and procedures for tackling learners’ needs had been observed to be insufficient in South African schools. The study is grounded in Piaget’s cognitive constructivism and Vygotsky’s social constructivism. The researchers conducted document analysis of teachers’ portfolios which were purposefully selected. Nine teachers– three from each of Grades 4 to 6 were sampled. The portfolios were analysed to establish whether the implementation of the formal assessments was aligned with the Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement requirements. A checklist was used to determine teachers’ implementation of formal assessment. Measures of central tendency were used to analyse data. The results revealed that teachers were not developing the abilities of learners in handling complex mathematical procedures as per the requirements of the policy. This implies that learners lacked the ability to break down mathematical problems into different factors or constituent parts. Learners were given a test instead of a project or investigation. Hence teachers were not promoting cooperative learning which is advocated by the policy. Therefore, teachers should be assisted by knowledgeable colleagues and subject advisors in their adoption and use of assessment. There must be a close examination of the classroom observation tools that are currently being utilised. Classroom observation assists teachers to improve their assessment strategies. The Department of Basic Education should supply tablets to primary schools to promote social constructive interaction amongst teachers and learners to enhance effective teaching and learning.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.8.18


Keywords


assessment; cooperative learning; formal assessment; intermediate phase; mathematics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abrie, M., Blom, N., & Fraser, B. (2016). Theoretical foundations. In M. Jacobs, N. C. G. Vakalisa, & N. Gawe (Eds.), Teaching-Learning Dynamics. (pp. 37). Pearson Education.

Borich, G. D. (2014). Effective teaching methods: Research-based practice. Pearson.

Chigonga, B. (2020). Formative assessment in mathematics education in the twenty-first century, theorizing STEM education in the 21st century. IntechOpen, 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen

Coombs, B. (1995). Successful teaching: A practical handbook. Heinemann.

Department of Basic Education, (2011). Curriculum and assessment policy statement, grades 4-6 mathematics. Government Printers. https://www.education.gov.za/ Portals/0/CD/National%20Curriculum%20Statements%20and%20Vocational/CAPS%20IP%20%20MATHEMATICS%20GR%204-6%20web.pdf?ver=2015-01-27-161430-553

Department of Basic Education, (2021). Intermediate phase annual teaching plans (ATPs), mathematics. Government Printers. https://www.education.gov.za/ Curriculum/IntermediatePhaseATPs2021.aspx

Donald, D., Lazarus, S., & Moolla, N. (2014). Educational psychology in social context: Eco systematic applications in South Africa. ABC Press.

Eggen, P. D, & Kauchak, D. P. (2016). Educational psychology: Windows on classrooms. Pearson.

Elrod, M., & Strayer, J. F. (2015). Using an observational rubric to facilitate change in undergraduate classroom norms. In C. Suurtamm & A. McDuffie (Eds.), Annual Perspectives in Mathematics Education 2015: Assessment to Enhance Teaching and Learning (pp. 87-96). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Fritz, A., Haase, V. G., & Rasanen, P. (2019). International handbook of mathematical learning difficulties: From the laboratory to the classroom. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97148-3

Gasa, V., & Marofa, P. (2015). Using secondary sources of data. In C. Okeke & M. van Wyk (Eds.), Educational research: An African approach. (pp. 355-370). Oxford University Press.

Gawe, N., Jacobs, M., & Vakalisa, N.C.G. (2016). Learner-centred methods. In M. Jacobs, N. C. G. Vakalisa & N. Gawe N. (Eds.), Teaching-learning dynamics. (pp. 250-281). Pearson Education.

Ivankova, N.V., Creswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V.L. (2016). Foundations and approaches to mixed-methods research. In K. Maree (Ed.), First steps in research. (pp. 306-336). Van Schaik.

Jacobs, M. (2016). Aims and objectives. In M. Jacobs M., N. C. G. Vakalisa & N. Gawe (Eds.), Teaching-learning dynamics. (pp. 105-137). Pearson Education.

Jojo, Z. (2019). Mathematics education system in South Africa. IntechOpen, https//doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85325

Kanjee, A., & Mthembu, J. (2015). Assessment literacy of foundation phase teachers: An exploratory study. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 5(1), 142-168. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v5i1.354

Killen, R. (2015). Teaching strategies for quality teaching and learning. Juta.

Lombard, K., & Themane, M. (2015). Contextualising teaching practice as a component of teacher education. In M. J. Taole (Ed.), Teaching practice, perspectives and frameworks. (pp. 11-24). Van Schaik.

Liberman, J. Levinin, J., & Luna-Bazaldua, D. (2020). Are students still learning during COVID-19? formative assessment can provide the Answer. World Bank Blogs. https://blogs.worldbank.org/education/are-students-still-learning-during-covid-19 formative-assessment-can-provide-answer

Maree, K., & Pietersen, J. (2016). The quantitative research process. In K. Maree (Ed.), First steps in research. (pp. 162-172). Van Schaik.

Mays, T., Grosser, M., & de Jagger, L. (2016). Getting practical: A guide to teaching and learning. Oxford University Press.

Nieuwoudt, S., & Reyneke, M. (2016). Assessment. In M. Jacobs, N. C. G. Vakalisa & N. Gawe (Eds.), Teaching-learning dynamics. Pearson Education.

Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Zaranis, N. (2016). Comparing tablets

and PCs in teaching mathematics: An attempt to improve mathematics

competence in early childhood education. Preschool and Primary Education,

(2), 241-253. https:// doi.org/10.12681/ppej.8779

Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Zaranis, N. (2018). The effectiveness of

computer and tablet assisted intervention in early childhood students’

understanding of numbers. An empirical study conducted in Greece. Education

and Information Technologies, 23(5), 1849–1871. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/191703/

Paulsen, R., & Dednam, A. (2016). Challenges in Mathematics: Mathematical Literacy and Numeracy. In E. Landsberg, D. Kruger & E. Swart (Eds.), Addressing barriers to learning: A South African perspective. (pp. 241-262). Van Schaik.

Piaget, J. (1953). The origin of intelligence in the child. Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Reddy, C., Le Grange, L, Beets, P., & Lundie, S. (2015). Quality assessment in South African schools. Juta.

Suurtamm, C., Thompson, D., Kim, R., Moreno, L., Sayac, N., Schukajlow, S., Silver, E., Ufer, S., & Vos, P. (2016). Assessment in mathematics education: Large scale assessment and classroom assessment. Springer.

Vakalisa, N. C. G. (2016). Participative teaching. In M. Jacobs, N. C. G. Vakalisa & N. Gawe (Eds.), Teaching-learning dynamics. (pp. 39-71). Pearson Education.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Harvard University Press.

William, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493