The Common Thinking Styles Based on the Mental Self-Government Theory Among Saudi University Students According to Gender, Academic Achievement and Extracurricular Activities

Ali Tared Aldossari, Mahmoud Moh'd Ali Abu Jadou

Abstract


This study aimed to investigate the common thinking styles based on Sternberg’s mental self-government theory among students of the Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Saudi Arabia, according to gender, academic achievement, and extracurricular activities. The descriptive approach was suitable for achieving the study’s objectives. The study sample consisted of 515 students (257 males, 258 females). The researchers developed an Arabic version of the Thinking Styles Inventory. The results showed that the most common thinking style among students is legislative, followed by the hierarchic, judicial, and external styles to high degrees, while the oligarchic, internal, conservative, and anarchic styles were less common at moderate degrees. The legislative style was more prevalent among female students than male students. Students with acceptable academic achievements most used legislative and executive thinking styles, while students with excellent achievements most used the judicial style. The results indicate that students with strong participation in extracurricular activities most commonly use legislative and judicial thinking styles. The study recommends paying more attention to the thinking styles of a new generation of individuals (males and females), who have creative potential, and increasing consideration of extracurricular activities due to their importance in shaping the students’ personalities and meeting their interests and needs.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.6.14


Keywords


thinking styles; mental self-government theory; academic achievement, extracurricular activities

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abu Hashem, E. S. (2015). Styles of thinking in the light of Sternberg’s theory: Study of comparison between the two samples ‘Egyptian and Saudi Arabia’ of university students. Saudi Society for Educational and Psychological Sciences, 48, 77–102. https://fac.ksu.edu.sa/sites/default/files/slyb_ltfkyr.pdf

Aljojo, N. (2017). Differences in styles of thinking ‘in light of Sternberg’s theory’: A case study of different educational levels in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 7(3), 333–346. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.291

Apaydin, B., & Cenberci, S. (2018). Correlation between thinking styles and teaching styles of prospective mathematics teachers. World Journal of Education, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v8n4p36

Bekomson, A. N., Amalu, M. N., Mgban, A. N., & Kinsley, A. B. (2020). Interest in extracurricular activities and self-efficacy of senior secondary school students in Cross River State, Nigeria. International Education Studies, 13(8). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v13n8p79

Bernardo, A. B. I., Zhang, L. F., & Callueng, C. M. (2020). Thinking styles and academic achievement among Filipino students. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163(2), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221320209598674

Coşkun, Y. (2018). A comparative study on university students’ rational and experiential thinking styles in terms of faculty, class level, and gender variables. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(9), 1863–1868. https://doi.org/0.13189/ujer.2018.060902

Dilekli, Y. (2017). The relationships between critical thinking skills and learning styles of gifted students. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(4). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED573216.pdf

Ginting, S. A. (2017). Facilitating effective teaching through learning based on learning styles and ways of thinking. Dinamika Ilmu, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v17i2.850

Ince, H., Çenberci, S., & Yavuz, A. (2018). The relationship between the attitudes of mathematics teacher candidates towards scientific research and their thinking styles. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(7), 1467–1476.

Khanna, N., Sivaswamy, V., Anand, M., & Ganapathy, D. (2020). Perception of dental students on the effect of extracurricular activities on academic performance. Drug Invention Today, 14(7), 1082–1086.https://jprsolutions.info/files/final-file-5f7d7ab65a86b3.34076986.pdf

Marchetti, R., Wilson, R. H., & Dunham, M. (2016). Academic achievement and extracurricular school activities of at-risk high school students. Educational Research Quarterly, 39(4).

Martínez-Romera, D. D. (2018). Sternberg–Wagner thinking styles: A research tool in social science didactics. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 8(4), 398¬–407. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.422

Ozan, Ceyhun. (2019). The Relationship between Prospective Teachers’ Thinking Styles and Attitudes towards Teaching Profession. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 8(3), 50-62. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v8n3p50. http://jct.sciedupress.com.

Ramzan, M., Usmani, N., & Arain, A. (2014). Effect of thinking and learning styles on students’ academic achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 17(1).

Sağlam, N., & Tunç, E. (2018). The relationship between thinking styles and the need for cognition of students in the faculty of education. International Education Studies, 11(11).

Saini, Garima & Shabnam. (2019). An Agnation of Mental Self-Government (MSG) and Career Personality Types. International Journal of Management and Information Technology, 4(1), 23-26. http://www.publishingindia.com/anwesh.

Sternberg, R. J. (1988). Mental self-government: A theory of intellectual styles and their development. Human Development, 31, 197–224. https://doi.org/10.1159/000275810

Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Thinking styles. Cambridge University Press. London-U.K. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511584152

Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1995). Style of thinking in the school. European Journal for High Ailiy, 6, 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/0937445940060211

Sternberg, R. J., & Wagner, R. K. (1992). Thinking style inventory [Manuscript, Yale University, New Haven, U.S.A].

Sternberg, R. J., & Zhang L. F. (2005). Styles of thinking as a basis of differentiated instruction. Theory into Practice, 44(3), 245–253.

Zhang, L.-F. (2001a). Do thinking styles contribute to academic achievement beyond self-rated abilities? The Journal of Psychology, 135(6), 621–637. https://hub.hku.hk/bitstream/10722/53501/1/69168.pdf?accept=1

Zhang, L.-F. (2001b). Thinking styles, self-esteem, and extracurricular experiences. International Journal of Psychology, 36(2), 100–107. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00207590042000128

Zhang, L.-F., & Sternberg, R. J. (2005). The three-fold model of intellectual styles. Educational Psychology Review, 17(1). https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10648-005-1635-4.pdf

Zhang, L.-F., & Wong, Y.-H. (2011). Hardiness and thinking styles: Implications for higher education. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 10(3). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272145361_Hardiness_and_Thinking_Styles_Implications_for_Higher_Education/link/58d8d9e8a6fdcc1baeb8ff5d/download


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493