Primary School Science Teachers’ Creativity and Practice in Malaysia

Norazilawati Abdullah, Zainun Mustafa, Mahizer Hamzah, Amir Hasan Dawi, Mazlina Che Mustafa, Lilia Halim, Salmiza Saleh, Che Siti Hajar Aisyah Che Abdul Khalil

Abstract


Creative pedagogy has been explored extensively, and previous research suggests that there is a gap between the level and practice of creativity of science teachers, and that it varies by school location. The aim of this study was to determine the levels of creativity, and creativity practice of primary school science teachers, and differences in the levels of creativity and creativity practice of primary school science teachers based on school location. The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT) were used to acquire qualitative data from 20 participants, and a questionnaire of creativity practice in science teaching was used to collect quantitative data from 409 participants. The qualitative data were analyzed according to the TTCT scoring technique and the quantitative data were analyzed descriptively using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 26. This study found that, that while overall teacher creativity was low, the teachers perceived that they employed highly creative practices. No difference was found in relation to environment, teaching aids, skills and science process skills of teachers in urban and rural areas. However, teachers in rural areas were more knowledgeable about creativity, while teachers in urban areas were better at practising it. This research provides baseline evidence on current practices in creative pedagogy of science teachers nationwide. 

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.7.19


Keywords


creative pedagogy; creativity; Malaysia; primary school; science education; Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT)

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, N. (2017). Development of interactive software for implementing the science process skills in science primary school. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(6). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i6/3033

Abdullah, N., Adnan, M., Ibharim, L. F., Hoe, T. W., Janan, D., Abdullah, J. M., Idris, N., & Wahab, A. S. A. (2018). Development a year one stem comic for science and mathematics subjects. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 8(2), 11–20.

Aleinikov, A. G. (2013). Creative pedagogy. In E. G. Carayannis (Ed.), Encyclopedia of creativity, invention, innovation and entrepreneurship (pp. 326–339). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_13

Allchin, D,. Møller Andersen, H., & Nielsen, K. (2014). Complementary approaches to teaching nature of science: Integrating student inquiry, historical cases, and contemporary cases in classroom practice. Science Education, 98(3), 461–486. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21111

Astrachan, O. (1998). Concrete teaching : Hooks and props as instructional technology. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 30(3), 21–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/290320.283003

Bart, W. M., Hokanson, B., & Can, I. (2017). An investigation of the factor structure of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2017.2.0051

Cairns, D., & Areepattamannil, S. (2019). Exploring the relations of inquiry-based teaching to science achievement and dispositions in 54 countries. Research in Science Education, 49(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9639-x

Castagneyrol, B., Valdés-Correcher, E., Bourdin, A., Barbaro, L., Bouriaud, O., Branco, M., Centenaro, G., Csóka, G., Duduman, M.-L., Dulaurent, A.-M., Eötvös, C. B., Faticov, M., Ferrante, M., Fürjes-Mikó, Ã., Galmán, A., Gossner, M. M., Harvey, D., Howe, A. G., Kaennel-Dobbertin, M., … Tack, A. J. M. (2020). Can school children support ecological research? Lessons from the Oak Bodyguard Citizen Science Project. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.267

Chan, D. W. (2011). East vs. West. In M. Runco, & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (2nd ed., pp. 415–421). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375038-9.00082-0

Chua, Y. P., Sharifah. M. N., Naim. M., & Wan Zah, W. A. (2003). Kreativiti guru pendidikan seni [Creativity of art education teachers]. Ertanika Journal Social & Humanistic, 11(1), 11–17.

Conradty, C., Lazoudis, A., & Sotiriou, S. (2020). Stories of tomorrow. Students’ visions on the future of space exploration. STORIES Deliverable D7.9: Digital Library. Final Conferences Proceedings. STORIES Consortium. https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/downloadPublic?documentIds=080166e5c5594643&appId=PPGMS on 17th August 2021

CotiÄ, N., Plazar, J., StarÄiÄ, A. I., & Zuljan, D. (2020). The effect of outdoor lessons in natural sciences on students’ knowledge, through tablets and experiential learning. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(5), 747–763. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.747

Craft, A., Ben Horin, O., Sotiriou, M., Stergiopoulos, P., Sotiriou, S., Hennessy, S., Chappell, K., Slade, C., Greenwood, M., Black, A., Dobrivoje, E. L., Timotijević, Ä., Drecun, A., Brajović, A., Belmontecinzia, C., & Conforto, G. (2016). CREAT-IT: Implementing creative strategies into science teaching. In M. Riopel, Z. Smyrnaiou (Eds.), New developments in science and technology education. Innovations in Science Education and Technology, Vol 23. (pp. 163–179). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22933-1_15

Cremin, T., & Chappell, K. (2019). Creative pedagogies: a systematic review. Research Papers in Education, 36(3), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2019.1677757

Cubukcu, E., & Cetintahra, G. E. (2010). Does analogical reasoning with visual clues affect novice and experienced design students’ creativity? Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 337–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.504656

Delparte, D. M., Richardson, R. T., Eitel, K. B., Jr., S. M., & Cohn, T. (2016). Promoting geoscience STEM interest in Native American students: GIS, geovisualization, and reconceptualizing spatial thinking skills. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 15(5), 1–15.

Djonko-Moore, C. M., Leonard, J., Holifield, Q., Bailey, E. B., & Almughyirah, S. M. (2018). Using culturally relevant experiential education to enhance urban children’s knowledge and engagement in science. Journal of Experiential Education, 41(2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825917742164

Engelman, S., Magerko, B., McKlin, T., Miller, M., Edwards, D., & Freeman, J. (2017). Creativity in authentic STEAM education with EarSketch. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 183–188. https://doi.org/10.1145/3017680.3017763

Fatin Aliah, P., Mohd Salleh, A., Mohammad Bilal, A., & Salmiza, S. (2014). Faktor penyumbang kepada kemerosotan penyertaan pelajar dalam aliran [Contributing factors to the decline in student participation in the stream]. Sains Humanika, 2(4), 63–71.

Hamdallah, A., Ozovehe, A., & Dyaji, L. (2014). Impact of creative teaching on science pupils’ academic perfomance. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSRJRME), 4(6), 40–44. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-04614044

Hamsiah Saee. (2004). Tahap Kreativiti Guru Sains Dan Amalannya Dalam Pengajaran [The level of creativity of science teachers and their practice in teaching]. Jurnal Penyelidikan MPBL, 5, 14–23.

Hedegaard, M. (2020). Ascending from the abstract to the concrete in school teaching — the double move between theoretical concepts and children’s concepts. Psychological Science and Education. 25(5), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2020250504

Henriksen, D., & Mishra, P. (2015). We teach who we are: Creativity in the lives and practices of accomplished teachers. Teachers College Record, 117(7), 1–46.

Horng, J.-S., Hong, J.-C., ChanLin, L.-J., Chang, S.-H., & Chu, H.-C. (2005). Creative teachers and creative teaching strategies. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 29(4), 352–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2005.00445.x

Hosseini, A. S., & Watt, A. P. (2010). The effect of a teacher professional development in facilitating students' creativity. Educational Research and Reviews, 5(8), 432-438.

Humble, S., Dixon, P., & Mpofu, E. (2018). Factor structure of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking Figural Form A in Kiswahili speaking children: Multidimensionality and influences on creative behavior. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.11.005

Januchowski-Hartley, S. R., Sopinka, N., Merkle, B. G., Lux, C., Zivian, A., Goff, P., & Oester, S. (2018). Poetry as a creative practice to enhance engagement and learning in conservation science. BioScience, 68(11), 905–911. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biy105

Johansson, E. (2001). The Nobel E-Museum – A Modern science education project on internet. International Journal of Modern Physics C, 12(4), 527–532. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129183101002188

Kandemir, M. A., Tezci, E., Shelley, M., & Demirli, C. (2019). Measurement of creative teaching in mathematics class. Creativity Research Journal, 31(3), 272–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2019.1641677

Kant, J., Burckhard, S., & Meyers, R. (2017). Engaging high school girls in Native American culturally responsive STEAM activities. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 18(5), 15–25.

Karampelas, K. (2019). Cross curricular science in elementary schools in Greece - The curriculum factor. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(7), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.7.2

Kelemen-Finan, J., Scheuch, M., & Winter, S. (2018). Contributions from citizen science to science education: an examination of a biodiversity citizen science project with schools in central Europe. International Journal of Science Education, 40(17), 2078–2098. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1520405

Kerby, H. W., Cantor, J., Weiland, M., Babiarz, C., & Kerby, A. W. (2010). Fusion Science Theater presents The Amazing Chemical Circus: A new model of outreach that uses theater to engage children in learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(10), 1024–1030. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed100143j

Khabibah, E. N., Masykuri, M., & Maridi, M. (2017). The effectiveness of module based on discovery learning to increase generic science skills. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 11(2), 146–153. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v11i2.6076

Kim, K. H. (2006). Can we trust creativity tests? A review of the Torrance Tests of creative thinking (TTCT). Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1801

Lam, S. L., Yeung, A., Lam, P., & McNaught, C. (2010). Creativity and science learning in a science enrichment programme in Hong Kong. International Journal of Learning, 17(2), 429–437. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/cgp/v17i02/46887

Liao, C. (2016). From interdisciplinary to transdisciplinary: An arts-integrated approach to STEAM education. Art Education, 69(6), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2016.1224873

Lillo, V. M. B., & Úbeda, A. I. P. (2017). Creativity and adolescence. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 7(3), 177–188.

Lin, W-W., & Liu, C-Y. (2016). On exploring factors for creative science teaching . Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 48(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20150422

Maulidah, N., Sunanih, Rahman, & Supriatna, N. (2021). Creative play and learning in natural environment to develop creative-ecoliteracy in elementary school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1764(1), 012112. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1764/1/012112

Miller, E. C., & Krajcik, J. S. (2019). Promoting deep learning through project-based learning: a design problem. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0009-6

Mohammad Rusdi, B. A. M., & Zawawi, I. (2017). Kreativiti Pengajaran Guru Bahasa Arab Di Malaysia. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 4(4), 27–38.

Nachiappan, S., Muthaiah, L., & Suffian, S. (2017). Analisis sikap murid terhadap mata pelajaran Sains di Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan (Tamil) [Analysis of students' attitudes towards science subjects in national type schools]. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, 7(2), 85–105. https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol7.no2.7.2017

Othman, R. (2009) Perkaitan antara kreativiti dan kemahiran penyelesaian masalah topik elektrokimia bagi pelajar tingkatan empat. [The relationship between creativity and problem-solving skills for the topic of electrochemistry for Form 4 students] (Unpublished Master's thesis, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia).

Purba, E. P. (2017). Analysis of the difficulties of the mathematical creative thinking process in the application of problem based learning model. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (AISTEEL), 104, 265–268. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-7-11-1

Reeves, L. E., Bolton, E., Bulpitt, M., Scott, A., Tomey, I., Gates, M., & Baldock, R. A. (2021). Use of augmented reality (AR) to aid bioscience education and enrich student experience. Research in Learning Technology, 29. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v29.2572

Sagmeister, K. J., Schinagl, C. W., Kapelari, S., & Vrabl, P. (2021). Students’ experiences of working with a socio-scientific issues-based curriculum unit using role-playing to negotiate antibiotic resistance. Frontiers in Microbiology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.577501

Said, M. M. M., & Alias, J. (2013). Kreativiti Pengajaran guru sekolah rendah di Malaysia [Teaching creativity of primary school teachers in Malaysia]. Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia, 27, 71–97.

Saorín, J. L., Melian-Díaz, D., Bonnet, A., Carbonell Carrera, C., Meier, C., & De La Torre-Cantero, J. (2017). Makerspace teaching-learning environment to enhance creative competence in engineering students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 188–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.01.004

Schvartzer, M., Elazar, M., & Kapon, S. (2021). Guiding physics teachers by following in Galileo’s footsteps. Science & Education, 30(1), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00160-4

Shazana, S. (2016). Kajian Perbandingan Tahap Dan Amalan Kreativiti Guru -Guru Sains Sekolah Berprestasi Tinggi (SBT), Sekolah Kluster Kecemerlangan (SKK)Dengan Sekolah Rendah Biasa (SK) Di Putrajaya [A comparative study of the level and practice of creativity of science teachers of high performance schools (SBT), cluster of excellence schools (SKK) with ordinary primary schools (SK) in Putrajaya] (Unpublished Master thesis, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris).

Toth, D., & Kayler, M. (2015). Integrating role-playing games into computer science courses as a pedagogical tool. Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 386–391. https://doi.org/10.1145/2676723.2677236

Wagh, A., Cook-Whitt, K., & Wilensky, U. (2017). Bridging inquiry-based science and constructionism: Exploring the alignment between students tinkering with code of computational models and goals of inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(5), 615–641. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21379

Wartono, W., Hudha, M. N., & Batlolona, J. R. (2017). How are the physics critical thinking skills of the students taught by using inquiry-discovery through empirical and theorethical overview? EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80632


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493