The Effect of 'box-and-bead' Analogy versus Retrieval-based Learning on Retention in Chemical Kinetics among First-Year Chemistry Students

Taurayi Willard Chinaka

Abstract


The study examined the effects of the box-and-bead analogy versus retrieval-based learning on students’ retention and performance in chemical kinetics among first-year chemistry students. A purposive sampling technique was used to sample participants from the accessible population. The sample was made of two hundred and forty-five (n = 245) first-year chemistry students, at a public university, in South Africa. The study adopted a sequential explanatory research design. A chemical kinetics retention test (CKRT) was used for data collection as pre-, post-test and delayed post-test. A reliability coefficient of 0.73 was established using the Kuderson and Richardson correlation moment coefficient. Participants in the two groups were taught using an advanced retrieval instruction approach and the box-and-bead analogy. The results of the study showed no statistical difference in the retention of procedural knowledge and a statistical difference in conceptual knowledge. Overall, students taught using advanced retrieval performed better than the other group. The study underlines the fact that analogy-based instruction can be effective in improving conceptual knowledge using concrete analogues that aid in the retention of chemical kinetics. The findings of this study are diagnostic and they assist module designers in determining the procedural and conceptual knowledge in chemical kinetics retained by students, even after years have passed.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.5.17


Keywords


analogy; base/target domains; chemical kinetics; cognitive load theory; retention; retrieval

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ajayi, V., & Angura, T. (2017). Improving Senior Secondary Students' Retention in Electrolysis Using Collaborative Concept Mapping Instructional Strategy (CCMIS). Greener Journal of Educational Research, 7(6), 87-92. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3032913

Arum, R., & Roska, J. (2011). Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses. University of Chicago Press.

Bain, K., & Towns, M. H. (2016). A review of research on the teaching and learning of chemical kinetics. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(2), 246-262. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RP00176E

Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Cortese, M. J., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., ... & Treiman, R. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior research methods, 39(3), 445-459.

Butler, A. C. (2010). Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(5), 1118–1133. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019902

Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing. Memory & Cognition, 36(3), 604–616. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.3.604

Chan, J. C., & McDermott, K. B. (2007). The testing effect in recognition memory: a dual process account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(2), 431.

Council for Higher Education. (CHE). (2013). A proposal for undergraduate curriculum reform in South Africa: A case for a flexible curriculum structure, Report of the Task Team on undergraduate curriculum structure. CHE.

Council on Higher Education. (CHE). (2016). South African higher education reviewed: Two decades of democracy. CHE.

Creswell, J. (2015). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. Pearson.

D’Ottone, L. & Ochonogor, E. (2017). Educational explorations of chemical kinetics in a Problem Based Learning context. The Electronic Journal of Chemistry, 9(4), 299-307. http://dx.doi.org/10.17807/orbital.v9i4.1049

Didis, N. (2015). The analysis of analogy used in the teaching of introductory quantum theory. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 16, 355-376. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RP00011D

Engelbrecht, J., Harding, A. & Du Preez, J. (2007). Long-term retention of basic mathematical knowledge and skills with engineering students. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(6), 735-744. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790701520792

Fischer, K. W. (2008). Dynamic cycles of cognitive and brain development: Measuring growth in mind, brain, and education. The educated brain, 127-150. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489907.010

Fritz, C. O., Morris, P. E., Nolan, D., & Singleton, J. (2007). Expanding retrieval practice: An effective aid to preschool children's learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(7), 991-1004.

Johnstone, A. H. (2009). Multiple representations in chemical education. Springer.

Kieran, C. (2013). The false dichotomy in mathematics education between conceptual understanding and procedural skills: An example from Algebra. In K. R. Leatham, (Ed.), Vital directions for Mathematics Education Research (pp. 153–171). Springer

Karpicke, J. D., & Bauernschmidt, A. (2011). Spaced retrieval: absolute spacing enhances learning regardless of relative spacing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(5), 1250.

Karpicke, J. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2011). Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science, 331(6018), 772-775. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1199327

Karpicke, J. D. (2009). Metacognitive control and strategy selection: Deciding to practice retrieval during learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(4), 469–486. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017341

Karpicke, J. D. (2012). Retrieval-Based Learning: Active Retrieval Promotes Meaningful Learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(3), 157–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412443552

Karpicke, J. D., & Zaromb, F. M. (2010). Retrieval mode distinguishes the testing effect from the generation effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 62(3), 227-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.11.010

Lysne, S. J., & Miller, B. G. (2017). A comparison of long-term knowledge retention between two teaching approaches. Journal of College Science Teaching, 46(6), 100.

Mascolo, F. & Fischer, K. (2016). What Can Dynamic Systems Models of Development Offer to the Study of Developmental Psycho-pathology. Developmental Psychopathology, 17(1), 20-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119125556.devpsy115

Potgieter, M., Engelbrecht, J. C., & Harding, A. F. (2006). Procedural and conceptual knowledge in undergraduate mathematics and chemistry. In 14th Annual Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education Conference. Pretoria, South Africa.

Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2011). Intricacies of spaced retrieval: A resolution. In Successful Remembering and Successful Forgetting (pp. 41-66). Psychology Press.

Rutherford, A. (2011). ANOVA and ANCOVA: A GLM approach. John Wiley & Sons.

Scott, I. (2014). First-Year Experience as Terrain of Failure or Platform for Development? Critical Choices for Higher Education. In B. Leibowitz, S. van Schalkwyk, and A. van der Merwe, Focus on First-Year Success: Perspectives Emerging from South Africa and Beyond. Sun Media Press.

Shahani, L & Jenkinson, K. (2016). Write on the edge: using a chemistry corpus to develop academic writing skills resources for undergraduate chemists. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 17, 580-589. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RP00005C

Taylor, A., Olofson, R. & Novak, T. (2016). Enhancing student retention of prerequisite knowledge through preâ€class activities and inâ€class reinforcement. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 8, 20-22. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20992

Zoller, U. (2002). Algorithmic, LOCS and HOCS (chemistry) exam questions: Performance and attitudes of college students. International Journal of Science Education, 24(2), 185-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110049060

Zumdahl, S. S., & Zumdahl, S. A. (2007). Acids and bases. Hougthon Mifflin Company, Boston, New York, 629-630.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493