Incorporation of Small-Group Learning Activities into Biology Lectures to Enhance Learning at a University in Pretoria, South Africa

Liziwe Lizbeth Mugivhisa, Joshua Olawole Olowoyo

Abstract


There have been intense teaching challenges at institutions of higher learning as a result of an increasing range of courses offered to students with diverse backgrounds and levels of preparedness. Lecturers are also faced with a high failure rate and increased retention rates. Student achievement is crucial, and efforts have to be made to adapt and change to methods of teaching that contribute to the better performance of students. Hence, calls have been made for a radical shift from teaching which is teacher-centered to student-centered teaching approaches. The study assessed students’ perceptions on the incorporation of active learning in small groups and the impact of the incorporation of small-group learning activities into Biology lectures on the performance of the students. Participants showed a preference for small-group learning activities and indicated that incorporating small-group learning activities into lectures should be compulsory. The average mean test marks of 72 Biology students before and after the incorporation of small-group learning activities were compared. Results showed that the mean test mark (52.7±15.7) of the participants was significantly higher after incorporation of small-group learning activities compared to before incorporation (38.9±16.4), indicating a positive effect (p<0.05) of small-group learning activities on student performance. The participants also showed a preference for the incorporation of small-group learning activities into lectures. It is recommended that other factors such as the preparedness of students before assessments be investigated in future studies.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.1.21


Keywords


academic performance; assessments; learning activities; lectures; small groups

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abu, R. B., Pendidikan, F. P., & Flowers, J. (1997). The effects of cooperative learning methods on achievement, retention and attitudes of Home Economics students in North Carolina. Journal of Career and Technical Education, 13(2), 16–22. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ543960.pdf

Biggs, J. (1999). What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research and Development, 18(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.642839

Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. Springer.

Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom (Rep. no. 1). George Washington University, ASHEERIC Higher Education.

Botelho, M. G. & O’Donnell, D. O. (2001). Assessment of the use of problem-orientated, small-group discussion for learning of a fixed prosthodontic, simulation laboratory course. British Dental Journal, 191(11), 630–636. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801253a

Burke, A. (2011). Group work: How to use groups effectively. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 11(2), 87–95. https://uncw.edu/jet/articles/vol11_2/burke.pdf

Cattaneo, K. H. (2017). Telling active learning pedagogies apart: From theory to practice. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 6(2), 144–152. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2017.7.237

Cavanagh, M. (2011). Students’ experiences of active engagement through cooperative learning activities in lectures. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787410387724

Cherney, I. D. (2008). The effects of active learning on students’ memories for course content. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(2), 152–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787408090841

Dema, K., & Tshering, K. (2020). The effects of active learning approach in teaching and learning science: A case of one of the primary schools in Bhutan. International Research Journal for Quality in Education, 7(1). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339641177_The_effects_of_active_learning_approach_in_teaching_and_learning_science_A_case_of_one_of_the_primary_schools_in_Bhutan

Demirci, C. (2017). The effect of active learning approach on attitudes of 7th grade students. International Journal of Instruction, 10(4), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.1048a

Diković, M., & Gergorić, T. (2020). Teachers’ assessment of active learning in teaching Nature and Society. Economic Research │ Ekonomska Istraživanja, 33(1), 1265–1279. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1728563

Eison, J. (2010). Using active learning instructional strategies to create excitement and enhance learning. University of South Florida. file:///C:/Users/Lenovo/Downloads/UsingActiveLearningInstructionalStrategiestoCreateExcitementandEnhanceLearningEisen-Handout.pdf

Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (1996). Navigating the bumpy road to student-centered instruction. College Teaching, 44(2), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.1996.9933425

GÇ¿rtz, I. (2011). Active learning in large classes. Proceedings of the 7th International CDIO Conference, Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, June 20-23, 2011.

Gull, F., & Shehzad, S. (2015). Effects of cooperative learning on students’ academic achievement. Journal of Education and Learning, 9(3), 246–255.

Hartikainen, S., Rintala, H., Pylväs, L., & Nokelainen, P. (2019). The concept of active learning and the measurement of learning outcomes: A review of research in engineering higher education. Education Sciences, 9(4), 276. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9040276

Hedden, M. K., Worthy, R., Akins, E., Slinger-Friedman, V., & Paul, R. C. (2017). Teaching sustainability using an active learning constructive approach: Discipline-specific case studies in higher education. Sustainability, 9(8), 1320. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081320

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2006). Active learning: Cooperation in the university classroom (3rd ed.). Interaction.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2008). Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning: The teacher’s role. In R. M. Gillies, A. Ashman, & J. Terwel (Eds.), Teacher’s role in implementing cooperative learning in the classroom (pp. 9–37). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70892-8_1

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal of Excellence in College Teaching, 25, 85–118. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284471328_Cooperative_Learning_Improving_university_instruction_by_basing_practice_on_validated_theory

Khan, Y. A., & Kousar, S. (2011). Factors influencing academic failure of university students. Conference: 8th International Conference on Recent Advances in Statistics At: Lahore, Pakistan. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2900.7360

Killen, R. (2007). Teaching strategies for outcomes-based education (2nd ed.). Social Science Press.

Killian, M., & Bastas, H. (2015). The effects of an active learning strategy on students’ attitudes and students’ performances in introductory sociology classes. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 15(3), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v15i3.12960

Knight, P. T. (2010). Complexity and curriculum: A process approach to curriculum-making. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(3), 369–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510120061223

Machemer, P. L., & Crawford, P. (2007). Student perceptions of active learning in a large cross-disciplinary classroom. Active Learning in Higher Education, 8(1), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787407074008

Manfrin, A. (2019). Students and faculty perception of active learning: A case study. Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal, 3(1). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337243204_Students_and_faculty_perception_of_Active_Learning_a_case_study

McMaster, K., & Fuchs, D. (2002). Effects of cooperative learning on the academic achievement of students with learning disabilities: An update of Tateyama-Sniezek’s reviews. Learning Disabilities Research Practice, 17(2), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5826.00037

Michael, J. (2006). Where’s the evidence that active learning works? Advanced Physiology Education, 30, 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00053.2006

Miller, C. J., & Metz, M. J. (2014). A comparison of professional-level faculty and student perceptions of active learning: Its current use, effectiveness and barriers. Advanced Physiology Education, 38, 246–252.

Muhammad, H. A. (2016). Active learning & teaching: Challenges & tips for teachers. 7th International Visible Conference of Educational Studies & Applied Linguistics, Erbil, Kurdistan, Iraq, 23-24 April 2016.

Nichols, J. (2002). The effects of cooperative learning on student achievement and motivation in a high school Geometry class. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(4), 467–476. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1996.0031

Northedge, A. (2003). Rethinking teaching in the context of diversity. Teaching in Higher Education, 8(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356251032000052302

Oliveira, P. C., Oliveira, C. G., De Souza, F., & Costa, N. (2006). Teaching strategies to promote active learning in higher education. In A. Méndez-Vilas, A. Solano Martin, J. A. Mesa González, & J. Mesa González (Eds.), Current developments in technology-assisted education (pp. 636-640). Formatex.

Owens, M. T., Trujillo, G., Seidel, S. B., Harrison, C. D., Farrar, K. M., Benton, H. P., Blair, J. R., Boyer, K. E., Breckler, J. L., Burrus, L. W., Byrd, D. T., Caporale, N., Carpenter, E. J., Chan, Y-H. M., Chen, J. C., Chen, L., Chen, L. H., Chu, D. S., Cochlan, W. P., Crook, R. J., et al. (2018). Collectively improving our teaching: Attempting Biology Department-wide professional development in scientific teaching. CBE Life Sciences Education, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-06-0106

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://www.engr.ncsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/drive/1smSpn4AiHSh8z7a0MHDBwhb_JhcoLQmI/2004-Prince_AL.pdf

Räisänen, M., Postareff, L., Mattsson, M., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2020). Study-related exhaustion: First-year students’ use of self-regulation of learning and peer learning and perceived value of peer support. Active Learning in Higher Education, 21(3), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787418798517

Singh, K., Mahajan, R., Gupta, P., & Singh, T. (2018). Flipped classroom: A concept for engaging medical students in learning. Indian Pediatrics, 55(6), 507–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-018-1342-0

Smith, C., & Cardaciotto, L. (2011). Is active learning like broccoli? Student perceptions of active learning in large lecture classes. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(1), 53–61. https://teachingcommons.yorku.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Is-active-learning-like-broccoli.pdf

Towns, M. H., & Grant, E. R. (1998). I believe I will go out of this class actually knowing something: Cooperative learning activities in Physical Chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(8), 819–835. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199710)34:8<819::AID- TEA5>3.0.CO;2-Y

Tran, V. D. (2014). The effects of cooperative learning on the academic achievement and knowledge retention. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(2), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v3n2p131

Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). Interaction between learning and development (1978). In M. Gauvin, & M. Cole (Eds.), From mind and society: Readings on the development of children (pp. 79–91). Freeman and Company; Harvard University Press.

Yuretich, R. F. (2004). Encouraging critical thinking: Measuring skills in large introductory science classes. Journal of College Science Teaching, 33(3), 40–46.

Zepke, N. (2013). Threshold concepts and student engagement: Revisiting pedagogical content knowledge. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(2), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787413481127


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493