Questions in English Medium Instruction Undergraduate Lectures in a Sri Lankan University: Why are they important?

Abdul Majeed Mohamed Navaz

Abstract


. Introduction of English Medium Instruction (EMI) is linked to language development, mainly in countries where English is not the mother tongue of the majority of the population. It is believed that teacher questions that trigger teacher-student interaction, especially dialogic interaction in an EMI classroom, can help students’ content and language development. Hence, this study investigates the types of questions lecturers ask, and the patterns of interaction developed in the lecture deliveries in English Medium Instruction (EMI) undergraduate lectures of a Sri Lankan university. It also looks into the underlying reasons for such practices. Six lectures delivered by two lecturers were recorded for this purpose and they were transcribed verbatim. The lecture transcripts were analysed to find the questions lecturers asked and the subsequent pattern of interactions developed. Interview with lecturers informed the underlying reasons for the existing questioning patterns. The majority of the questions asked by the lecturers were rhetorical in nature, and only a limited number of non-rhetorical questions, which could create meaningful interactional episodes of dialogic nature, were found. This study enlightens that lecturers should be trained to ask non-rhetorical questions in order to develop interaction if the objectives of EMI are to be achieved.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.12.11


Keywords


Teacher questions; English medium instruction; Teacher-student interaction; Dialogic interaction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alexander, R. (2006). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. York: Dialogos.

Ament, J. R., & Pérez Vidal, C. (2015). Linguistic outcomes of English medium instruction programmes in higher education: A study on economics undergraduates at a Catalan university. Higher Learning Research Communications, 5(1), 47-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v5i1.239

Anderson, L. W., & D. R. Krathwohl. (2001). A Taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.

Blosser, P. E. (1975). How to ask the right questions. Arlington: National Science Teachers Association.

Cammarata, L., & Tedick, D. (2012). Balancing content and language in instruction: The experience of immersion teachers. Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2012.01330.x

Chang, Y. Y. (2012). The use of questions by professors in lectures given in English: Influences of disciplinary cultures. English for Specific Purposes, 31(2), 103-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.08.002

Chapple, J. (2015). Teaching in English is not necessarily the teaching of English. International Education Studies, 8(3), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n3p1

Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 815–843. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20171

Choi, J., Tatar, B., & Kim, J. Y. (2014). Dialogic interactions in the English-mediated classroom: A case study of a social science class for engineering students in Korea. Asian Social Science. 10(16). 123-130. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n16p123

Csomay, E. (2006). Academic talk in American university classrooms: Crossing the boundaries of oral-literate discourse? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(2), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.02.001

Dafouz, E., & Sánchez García, D. (2013). ‘Does everybody understand?’ Teacher questions across disciplines in English-mediated university lectures: An exploratory study. Language Value, 5(1), 129-151. https://doi.org/10.6035/languagev.2013.5.7

Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) classrooms. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.

Dearden, J. (2015). English as a medium of instruction-a growing global phenomenon. London: British Council. Retrieved from https://www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/ files/ e484_emi_cover_option_3_final_web.pdf

Dong, Y. R. (2002). Integrating language and content: How three biology teachers work with non-English speaking students. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 5(1), 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050208667745

Ekoç, A. (2020). English Medium Instruction (EMI) from the perspectives of students at a technical university in Turkey. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(2), 231-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877x.2018.1527025

Fortanet, I. (2004). The use of ‘we’ in university lectures: Reference and function. English for Specific Purposes. 23(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-4906(03)00018-8

Georgiou, S. I. (2012). Reviewing the puzzle of CLIL. ELT Journal, 66(4), 495–504. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccs047

Gibbons, P. (2003). Mediating language learning: Teacher interactions with ESL students in a content-based classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 37(2), 247–273. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588504

Gibbons, P. (2015). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching English language learners in the mainstream classroom (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Gupta, A., & Lee, G.-L. (2015). Dialogic teaching approach with English language learners to enhance oral language skills in the content areas. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(5), 10-17. https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/teachinglearning_fac_pubs/19

Hall, J. K., & Verplaetse, L. S. (Eds.). (2000). Second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Haneda, M. (2005). Some functions of triadic dialogue in the classroom: Examples from L2 research. The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 62(2), 313–333. https://doi.org/10.1353/cml.2006.0003

Haneda, M., & Wells, G. (2010). Learning science through dialogic inquiry: Is it beneficial for English-as-additional-language students? International Journal of Educational Research, 49(1),10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2010.05.003

Hernandez-Nanclares, N., & Jimenez-Munoz, A. (2015). English as a medium of instruction: Evidence for language and content targets in bilingual education in economics. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 20(7), 883-896. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2015.1125847

Hu, G., & Duan, Y. (2018). Questioning and responding in the classroom: a cross-disciplinary study of the effects of instructional mediums in academic subjects at a Chinese university. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(3), 303-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1493084

Hu, G., & Li, X., (2017). Asking and answering questions in English-medium instruction classrooms: What is the cognitive and syntactic complexity level? In J. Zhao & L. Q. Dixon (Eds.), English medium instruction in Chinese universities: Perspectives, discourse and evaluation. (pp. 184-203). New York: Routledge.

Humphreys, P., & Mousavi, A. (2010). Exit testing: A whole-of-university approach. Language Education in Asia,1(1), 8-22. https://doi.org/10.5746/leia/10/v1/a03/humphreys_mousavi

Kumar, S. (2003). An Innovative method to enhance interaction during lecture sessions. Advances in Physiology Education, 27(1), 20–25. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00043.2001

Larson, L. R., & Lovelace, M. D. (2013). Evaluating the efficacy of questioning strategies in lecture-based classroom environments: Are we asking the right questions? Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 24, 105–122.

Lei, J., & Hu, G. (2014). Is English-medium instruction effective in improving Chinese undergraduate students' English competence? International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 52(2), 99-126. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2014-0005

Llinares, A., & Pascual Peña, I. (2015). A genre approach to the effect of academic questions on CLIL students’ language production. Language and Education, 29, 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2014.924964

Macaro, E., Curle, S., Pun, J., An, J., & Dearden, J. (2018). A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teaching, 51(1), 36–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000350

Macaro, E. (2020). Exploring the role of language in English medium instruction, International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(3), 263-276. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/13670050.2019.1620678

Martín del Pozo, M. A. (2017). Academic discourse in English medium instruction contexts: A look at teacher explanations. EPiC Series in Language and Linguistics 2,12-118. https://doi.org/10.29007/cl6r

Marton, F., & Tsui, A. B. M. (Eds.). (2004). Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Matusov, E. (2009). Journey into dialogic pedagogy. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongst teachers and learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Mercer, N. (2001). Language for teaching a language. In C. Candlin & N. Mercer (Eds.), English language teaching in its social context: A reader (pp. 243–257). New York, NY: Routledge.

Morell, T. (2004). Interactive lecture discourse for university EFL students. English for Specific Purposes, 23(3), 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-4906(03)00029-2

Nassaji, H., & Wells, G. (2000). What’s the use of triadic dialogue. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 376–406. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.3.376

Navaz, A. M. M. (2012). Lecturer-student interaction in English-medium science lectures: An investigation of perceptions and practice at a Sri Lankan university where English is a second language [Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Nottingham] Nottingham etheses. Retrieved from http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/12995/.

Navaz, A. M. M. (2013). A study on perception of lecturer-student interaction in English- medium science lectures. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 7(2), 117-136. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1167266.pdf

Navaz, A. M. M. (2020). Developing a framework for understanding lecturer-student interaction in English-medium undergraduate lectures in Sri Lanka: First step towards dialogic teaching. International Journal of English Linguistics. 10(6), 395-409. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v10n6p395

O'Loughlin, K., & Arkoudis, S. (2009). Investigating IELTS exit score gains in higher education. IELTS Research Reports. 10, 1-50. Retrieved from https://www.ielts.org/-/media/research-reports/ielts_rr_volume10_report3.ashx

Rogier, D. (2012). The effects of English-medium instruction on language proficiency of students enrolled in higher education in the UAE. EdD Thesis, The University of Exeter. Retrieved from https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/handle/10036/4482

Rose, H., Curle, S., Aizawa, I. & Thompson, G. (2019). What drives success in English medium taught courses? The interplay between language proficiency, academic skills, and motivation. Studies in Higher Education, https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1590690

Sánchez-García, D. (2010). Classroom interaction in university settings: The case of questions in three disciplines (M.A. Thesis). Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Retrieved from http://eprints.ucm.es/12793/1/Davinia_Sanchez.pdf

Sánchez-García, D. (2018). Teacher questioning: Exploring student interaction and cognitive engagement in Spanish and EMI university lectures. Porta Linguarum, Monográfico, (3)3, 103-120. https://doi.org/10.30827/digibug.54304

Scott, P. (1998) Teacher talk and meaning making in science classrooms: A Vygotskian analysis and review. Studies in Science Education, 32(1), 45–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269808560127

Scott, P. H., Mortimer, E. F., & Aguiar, O. G. (2006). The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons. Science Education, 90(4), 605–631. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20131

Staarman, J., & Mercer, N. (2010). The Guided construction of knowledge: Talk between teachers and students. In K. Littleton, C. Wood & J. K. Staarman (Eds.), International handbook of psychology (pp. 75-104). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Stoller, F. L. (2004). Content-Based instruction: Perspectives on curriculum planning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 261–283. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190504000108

Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. M. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 125–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Teo, P. (2016). Exploring the dialogic space in teaching: A study of teacher talk in the preuniversity classroom in Singapore. Teaching and Teacher Education, 56, 47-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.019

University Grants commission (UGC). (2021). Circular number, 01/2021.

van Zee, E. H., Iwasyk, M., Kurose A., Simpson, D. & Wild, J. (2001). Student and teacher questioning during conversations about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 159–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200102)38:2<159::AID-TEA1002> 3.0.CO;2-J.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society. London: Harvard University.

Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse language in action. Oxon: Routledge.

Wells, G., & Arauz, R. M. (2006). Dialogue in the classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(3), 379–428. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1503_3

Xie, W., & Curle, S. (2020). Success in English medium instruction in China: significant indicators and implications. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 1-13, https://doi.org/ 10.1080/13670050.2019.1703898

Yip, D. Y., (2004). Questioning skills for conceptual change in science instruction. Journal of Biological Education, 38(2), 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2004.9655905


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493