The Concept of In Situ Lecturing

Joachim R. R. Ritter, Ellen Gottschämmer

Abstract


Traditional teaching at university level takes place mainly in lecture rooms without any direct linkage to the real subject. Thus even during well taught lectures the human, in our case students’, multi-sense receptivity is stimulated only in a limited way. This means that just a part of the actual subject matter can be transferred. Therefore, students will not learn to observe the whole range of the circumstances and environmental parameters involved in a specific subject. This problem arises especially in natural sciences and, partly, engineering teaching in which the environmental setting is often a key to successfully understand complex processes, proportions and scales as well as human (counter) actions. In our concept “in situ lecturing†we teach at the place which is being studied, hence “in situâ€. In situ lecturing is a valuable pedagogical concept to develop student’s understanding of basic concepts, to enable them to transfer concepts and theory to local conditions, to train practical skills and to promote a comprehensive understanding of processes. This approach is achieved by an integrative combination of pre-courses and practicals in the classroom, followed by in situ lectures, practicals and seminars as well as a final reporting. Examples are presented from geophysics but these may be transferred to many other disciplines.

Keywords


educational case studies

Full Text:

PDF

References


Hursh, B. A., & Borzak, L. (1979). Toward cognitive development through field studies. Journal of Higher Education, 50, 63-78.

Butler, R. (2008). Teaching Geoscience through Fieldwork. GEES Subject Centre, Learning and Teaching Guide, http://www-new1.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/Documents/subjects/gees/GEES_guides_rb_teaching_geoscience.pdf (accessed 1 March 2015).

Claiborne, L., Morrell, J., Bandy, J., & Bruff, D. (2014). Teaching outside the classroom, http://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/teaching-outside-the-classroom (accessed 1 March 2015).

Craanen, M. (2010). Fakultätsübergreifendes Monitoring der Veranstaltungsqualität am Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT) [Title in English: Inter-faculty monitoring of teaching quality at KIT]. Qualität in der Wissenschaft (QiW) - Zeitschrift für Qualitätsentwicklung in Forschung, Studium und Administration, 4 (1/2010), 2-11.

Handelsman, J., Ebert-May, D., Beichner, R., Bruns, P., Chang, A., DeHaan, R., Gentile, J., Lauffer, S., Stewart, J., Tilghman, S. M., & Wood, W. B. (2004). Scientific Teaching. Science, 304 (5670), 521-522.

Kastens, K. A., Manduca, C. A., Cervato, C., Frodeman, R., Goodwin, C., Liben, L. S., Mogk, D. W., Spangler, T. C., Stillings, N. A., & Titus, S. (2009). How geoscientists think and learn. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 90 (31), 265-266.

Laws, P. (1991). Calculus-based physics without lectures. Physics Today, 44 (12), 24-31.

Lonergan, N., & Andresen, L. W. (1988). Field-based Education: Some Theoretical Considerations. Higher Education Research and Development, 7, 63-77.

Powell, K., (2003). Science education: Spare me the lecture. Nature, 425, 234-236.

Reiber, K. (2006). Wissen – Können – Handeln. Ein Kompetenzmodell für lernorientiertes Lehren [Title in English: Knowledge – Ability – Action: A conceptual model for learning-oriented teaching]. Tübinger Beiträge zur Hochschuldidaktik, 2/1.

Thompson, D. B. (1982). On discerning the purposes of geological fieldwork. Geology Teaching, 7, 59-65.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493