Reimagining the Sustainable and Social Justice Mathematics Classrooms in the Fourth Industrial Revolution

Tshele J. Moloi, Mogalatjane E. Matabane

Abstract


In this conceptual paper, we provide some ways to think about sustainability and a social justice approach to teaching of mathematics in Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) classrooms. We imagine the mathematics classrooms in 4IR not only to provide sustainable education, but also to promote core values and qualities of social justice. The teaching of mathematics for social justice is a pedagogy that seeks to expose students to issues concerning power between social groups. It is an approach to teaching that seeks to enable students not only to maintain the status quo, but also to acquire the necessary skills to challenge current practices and offer alternatives. While there is an increasing emphasis on incorporating technology into the teaching and learning of mathematics to produce educated citizenry that will be able to function in 4IR, it is equally important that one guards against unintended consequences brought about by 4IR and not deny access to learners from a low socio-economic environment. Using critical discourse analysis, the paper argues that, as we usher 4IR into the mathematics classroom, one should also be mindful of the social skills that constitute humankind. Social skills and human capital are good foundations for understanding mathematical concepts, and critical skills need to operate effectively and productively in 4IR. Moreover, social skills such as persuasion and emotional intelligence are in higher demand across industries and in education sectors than narrow technical skills, which include, among others, programming or equipment operation and control.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.12.15


Keywords


Social justice; sustainability; Fourth Industrial revolution; Mathematics teaching and learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abaté, C. J., & Cantone, K.A. (2005). An evolutionary approach to mathematics education: enhancing learning through contextual modification. Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 15(2), 157-176. doi:10.1080/10511970508984115

Asllani, A., Ettkin, L., & Somasundar, A. (2008). Sharing knowledge with conversational technologies: Web logs versus discussion boards. International Journal of Information Technology and Management, 7, 217-230. doi:10.1504/IJITM.2008.016607

Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617-645. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639

Bozkurt, G. (2017). Social Constructivism: Does It Succeed in Reconciling Individual Cognition with Social Teaching and Learning Practices in Mathematics. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(3), 210-218. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1131532

Brahim, A., & Dahlan, A.R.A. (2019). University of the Future: Reshaping Malaysian Universities’ relevance through humanising education and 4IR. (Online) International Journal of Management and Commerce Innovations, 6(2), 1106-1113. Retrieved from www.researchpublish.com (ISSN 2348-7585).

Carrington, V. (2020). Rethinking middle years: Early adolescents, schooling and digital culture. Routledge.

Charalambous, C.Y. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: An exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 430-511. doi:10.1080/07370000802177235

D'Ambrosio, U. (2017). Ethnomathematics and the pursuit of peace and social justice. ETD - Educação Temática Digital. 19,653-666. doi:10.20396/etd. v19i3.8648367

De Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2013). New materialist ontologies in mathematics education: The body in/of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(3), 453-470. Retrieved from https:www.jstor.org/stable/23434902

Dehaene, S. (2011) The number sense: how the mind creates mathematics. Revised and updated edition. New York: Oxford University Press (ISBN 978-0-19-991039-7).

Department of Basic Education. (2011). Mathematics: Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement Grades 10-12. Department of Basic Education: Pretoria.

Dowling, P. (2013). Social activity method (SAM): A fractal language for mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 25, 317–340. doi:10.1007/s13394-013-0073-8

Ernest, P. (1998). Social constructivism as a philosophy of mathematics. Suny Press.

Fiske, E. B., & Ladd, H. F. (2004). Elusive equity: Education reform in post-apartheid South Africa. Brookings Institution Press.

Froyd, J. E., & Ohland, M. W. (2013). Integrated engineering curriculum. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 147-164. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00835.x

Gamede, N. W. (2017). Human capital development in South Africa: perspectives on education in the post-apartheid era. Master of Commerce. University of South Africa.

Gerdes, P. (2009). Exploration of technologies, emerging from African cultural practices, in mathematics (teacher) education. ZDM Mathematics Education, 42, 11-17. doi:10.1007/s11858-009-0208-2

Gerofsky, S. (2016). Approaches to embodied learning in mathematics. In L. D. English & D. Kirshner (eds), Handbook of international research in mathematics education. New York: Routledge.

Gilson, L. L., & Goldberg, C. B. (2015). Editors’ Comment: So, what is a conceptual paper. Group & Organization Management (GOM), 40(2) 127-130. doi:10.1177/1059601115576425

Griffin, L., Dodds, P., & Rovegno, I. (2012). Pedagogical content knowledge for teachers: Integrate everything you know to make students learn. Journal of Physical Education, 67(9), 57-61. doi:10.1080/07303084.1996.10604857

Gustlin, D. Z. (2012). Why can't we paint in Math class? Integrating art into the core curriculum (Doctoral dissertation). University of Florida.

Hasbi, M., Lukito, A., & Sulaiman, R. (2019). The Realistic of Mathematic Educational Approach to Enhancing Ability Mathematical Connections. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 2(4), 179-183. doi:10.33122/ijtmer. v2i4.82

Häyrinen-Alestalo, M. (2005). Editorial. Science Studies: a Scandinavian journal published by the Finnish Society for Science Studies, 18(2), 3-4.

Hedges, H. (2019). The “fullness of lifeâ€: Learner interests and educational experiences. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 23, 100258. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.11.005

Hersh, R. (1997). What is mathematics, really? Oxford University Press.

Johnson-Glenberg, M. C., Birchfield, D. A., Tolentino, L., & Koziupa, T. (2014). Collaborative embodied learning in mixed reality motion-capture environments: two science studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 86-104. doi:10.1037/a0034008

Karim, N. K. A. (2019). Doing emotional labour in the Fourth industrial revolution (4IR): Is religious television a humanised workplace? Jurnal Komunikasi Malaysian Journal of Communication, 35(2),379- 396. doi:10.17576/JKMJC-2019-3502-23

Kasperiuniene, J. (2014). Work status and immersive presence in participatory virtual community. Role of Higher Education Institutions in Society: Challenges, Tendencies and Perspectives, 1(3), 95-100.

Khuzwayo, H. B. (2005). A history of mathematics education research in South Africa: The apartheid years. In R. Vithal, J. Adler, & C. Keitel (Eds.), Researching mathematics education in South Africa. Perspectives, practices, and possibilities ,307–328. Cape Town, South Africa: HSRC Press.

Ladd, H., & Fiske, E. (2006). Racial equity in education: How far has South Africa come? Perspectives in Education, 24(2), 95-108.

Le Roux, K. (2008). A critical discourse analysis of a real-world problem in mathematics: looking for signs of change, Language and Education, 22(5), 307-326. doi:10.1080/09500780802152663

Lindgren, R., & Johnson-Glenberg, M. (2013). Emboldened by embodiment: six precepts for research on embodied learning and mixed reality. Educational Researcher, 42, 445-452. doi:10.3102/0013189X13511661

Mann, E. L. (2006). Creativity: The essence of mathematics. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30(2), 236-260. doi: 10.4219/jeg-2006-264

Maringe, F., & Osman, R. (2016). Transforming the post-school sector in South Africa: Limits of a skills-driven agenda. South African Journal of Higher Education, 30(5), 120-140. doi:10.20853/30-5-616

Martin, D. B. (2009). Researching race in mathematics education. Teachers College Record, 111(2), 295-338.

Midgett, C. W., & Eddins, K.S. (2001). NCTM’s Principles and Standards for School mathematics: for Administrators. NASSP Bulletin, 85(623), 35-42. doi:10.1177/019263650108562305

Moloi, T. J. (2013). An analysis of challenges in the teaching of problem solving in Grade 10 mathematics. The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa: Special edition on Sustainable Learning Environments and Social Justice, 9(3), 480-492. doi:10.4102/td.v9i3.192

Morin, J. E., & Franks, D. J. (2009). Why do some children have difficulty learning mathematics? Looking at language for answers. Preventing school failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 54(2), 111-118. doi:10.1080/10459880903217861

Noble III, R., & Morton C. H. (2013). African Americans and Mathematics Outcomes on National Assessment of Educational Progress: Parental and Individual Influences. Journal of Child & Family Studies, 22, 30-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10826-012-9640-y

Nur Kareelawati, A. K. (2018). Doing emotional labour in the fourth industrial revolution (4IR): is religious television a humanised workplace? Creative Industries International Conference (CIIC), 1-17. doi:10.17576/JKMJC-2019-3502-23

Oosthuizen, J. H. (2016). ‘An assessment of 4IR-Intelligence of South African Management Practitioners through the lens of the Fourth Industrial Revolution.’ In proceedings of 28th Annual Conference of the Southern African Institute of Management Scientists, University of Pretoria, South Africa, 5-7 September (ISBN: 978-0-620-71797-7).

Orrill, R. (2003). The National Council on Education and the Disciplines. USA: The National Council on Education and the Disciplines (ISBN: 0-9709547-1-9).

Osman, K., Chuo, L. & Vebrianto, R. (2013). 21st Century Biology: An Interdisciplinary approach of biology, technology, engineering and mathematics education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102, 188-194. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.732

Panksepp, J., & Biven, L. (2012). The archaeology of mind: Neuroevolutionary origins of human emotions. New York: WW Norton & Company.

Piachaud, D. (2008). Social justice and public policy: a social policy perspective. Social justice and public policy: Seeking fairness in diverse societies, 33-51. ISBN: 9781861349330

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2010). Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: Myths and strategies. International journal of nursing studies, 47(11), 1451-1458. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.06.004

Rubin, M. (2017). Full transcript: Tim Cook delivers MIT’s commencement speech, 9 June. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/3NXjUpo-1q8

Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution: what it means, how to respond. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond/

Selamat, A., Alias, R.A., Hikmi, S.N., Puteh, M., & Tapsir, S.H. (2017). Higher Education 4.0: Current Status and Readiness in the Meeting the Fourth Industrial Revolution Challenges. Redesigning Higher Education Towards Industry 4.0, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 23–24 August. Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/document/367933437/Higher-Education-4-0-Current-Status-and-Readiness-in-Meeting-the-Fourth-Industrial-Revolution-Challenges-1

Setati, M. (2001). Researching mathematics education and language in multilingual South Africa. The Mathematics Educator, 12(2), 6-20. Corpus ID: 12346983

Simms, V. (2016). Mathematical mindsets: unleashing students’ potential through creative math, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. Research in Mathematics Education, 18, 1-4. doi: 10.1080/14794802.2016.1237374

Stahl, G. (2013). Translating Euclid: Designing a human-centered mathematics. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics, 6(2), 1-235. ISBN-13: 978-1627051354

Stauba, S., Karaman, E., Kaya, S., Karapinara, H., & Güven, E. (2015). Artificial neural network and agility. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195(2015), 1477-1485. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.448

Taylor, N. (2019). Inequalities in teacher Knowledge in South Africa. In N. Spaul, J. Jansen (eds) South African Schooling: The Enigma of Inequality. Policy Implications of Research in Education,10, 263–282. Springer, Cham. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-18811-5_14

Vara, A. (2006). An insider’s view on science and society. Re-reading John Ziman. Journal of Science Communication, 5(4), 1-10. doi:10.22323/2.05040303

Volmink, J. (1994). Mathematics by all. In Cultural perspectives on the mathematics classroom (pp. 51-67). Springer, Dordrecht. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-1199-9_4

Weldeana, H. N. (2016). Ethnomathematics in Ethiopia: Futile or fertile for mathematics education? Momona Ethiopian Journal of Science (MEJS), 8(2), 146-167. doi: 10.4314/mejs. v8i2.4

Yenicioglua, B., & Suerdema, A. (2015). Participatory new product development – a framework for deliberately collaborative and continuous innovation design. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195(2015), 1443-1452. Retrieved from http://cyberleninka.org/article/n/938944

Yosso, T. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital. A capital race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69-91. doi:10.1080/1361332052000341006


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493