Using Systematic Synthetic Phonics to Accelerate Rural Indigenous Children’s Acquisition of Early Literacy Skills

Jia Rong Yap, Mellisa Lee Lee Chin

Abstract


Studies focusing on the strategy of phonics in Malaysia have highlighted the insufficiency and ineffectiveness of SBELC phonics training received by teachers, resulting in confusion among them as to what really constitutes effective use of the phonics strategy. On the other hand, systematic synthetic phonics (SSP) has been proven beneficial in accelerating the performance of children in their early literacy. However, few studies have been conducted on English language learners as the majority of those research was focused on native speakers of the English language. Against this background, this article presents a description of a systematic way of teaching phonics that could inform teachers on how the strategy can be optimally utilised to accelerate the performance of students who are possibly at risk of being left behind. It then reports an investigation that compared the efficacy of SSP against SBELC phonics in accelerating the acquisition of early literacy skills with a group of indigenous children residing in the rural parts of Sarawak, Malaysia. Five instruments; (1) productive letter-sound test, (2) free-sound isolation test, (3) reading test, (4) spelling test, and (5) oral-reading fluency test were administered to measure phonemic awareness, decoding, reading, and spelling ability. Data were collected from the pretest and the posttest. The results demonstrate that both groups recorded significant improvement in reading and spelling, but children in the experimental group (SSP) outperformed the control group (SBELC phonics) significantly. Following this, SSP should be implemented in classrooms to help accelerate children’s early reading fluency and spelling ability. 

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.10.1


Keywords


early literacy; English language learners; indigenous children; phonemic awareness; systematic synthetic phonics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Armbruster, B. B., Lehr, F., & Osborn, J. (2001). Put reading first: The research building blocks for teaching children to read kindergarten through grade 3. Washington, D.C., WA: National Institute for Literacy. Retrieved from http://www.nifl.gov

Beck, I. L., & Beck, M. E. (2013). Making sense of phonics: The hows and whys (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Bowey, J. A. (2011). Need for systematic synthetic phonics teaching within the early reading curriculum. Australian Psychology, 41(2), 79–84. doi:10.1080/00050060600610334

Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., Chiang, C. P., & Loef, M. (1989). Using knowledge of children’s mathematics thinking in classroom teaching: An experimental study. American Educational Research Journal, 26(4), 499-531. doi:10.3102/00028312026004499

Chin, M. L. L., Karunakaran, K., & Yap, J. R. (2019). The role of negotiated interaction in L2 vocabulary acquisition among primary ESL learners. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 25(2), 1-21. doi:10.17576/3L-2019-2502-01

De Graaff, S., Bosman, A. M. T., Hasselman, F., & Verhoeven, L. (2009). Benefits of systematic phonics instruction. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13(4), 318-333. doi:10.1080/10888430903001308

Ehri, L. C. (2020). The science of learning to read words: A case for systematic phonics instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), 45-60. doi:10.1002/rrq.334

Eun, H. J. (2012). Oral reading fluency in a second language reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 24(2), 186-208. Retrieved from http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl

Griffith, P. L., & Olson, M. W. (1992). Phonemic awareness helps beginning readers break the code. The Reading Teacher, 45(7), 516-523. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/20200912

Harris, T. L., & Hodges, R. E. (1995). The literacy dictionary: The vocabulary of reading and writing. Newark, DE: International Reading Association. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED385820

Hazita, A. (2016). Implementation and challenges of English language education reform in Malaysian primary schools. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. 22(3), 650-678. doi:10.17576/3L-2016-2203-05

Jiang, X., Sawaki, Y., & Sabatini, J. (2012). Word reading efficiency and oral reading fluency in ESL reading comprehension. Reading Psychology, 33, 323–349. doi:10.1080/02702711.2010.526051

Johns, J., & Berglund, R. L. (2009). Fluency: Strategies and assessments (3rd ed.). Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt Publishing.

Johnson, R. C., & Tweedie, M. G. (2010). Could phonemic awareness instruction be (part of) the answer for young EFL learners? A report on the early literacy project in Malaysia. TESOL Quarterly, 44(4), 822-829. doi:10.5054/tq.2010.238131

Jolliffe, W., Waugh, D., & Gill, A. (2019). Teaching systematic synthetic phonics in primary schools (3rd ed.). London, England: Sage Publications.

Malaysia Ministry of Education. (2011). Primary Standard-Based Curriculum Dokumen Standard Kurikulum Sekolah Rendah Bahasa Inggeris SK Tahun Satu & Dua. Putrajaya, Malaysia: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum.

Malaysia Ministry of Education. (2017). KSSR: Bahasa Inggeris Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Tahun 2. Putrajaya, Malaysia: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum.

McGeown, S. P., Johnston, R. S., & Medford, E. (2012). Reading instruction affects the cognitive skills supporting early reading development. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(3), 360-364. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.01

Mesmer, H. A. E., & Griffith, P. L. (2005). Everybody's selling it: But just what is explicit, systematic phonics instruction?. The Reading Teacher, 59(4), 366-376. doi:10.1598/RT.59.4.6

Nadiah Yan, A., Napisah, K., & Mariyatunnitha, S. (2014). Implementing the teaching of phonics in Malaysian primary schools. Asian Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 2, 95-111. Retrieved from https://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/index.php/ AJELP/article/view/1103

National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Reports of the subgroups. Washington, D.C., WA: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

Purewal, S. (2008). Synthetic phonics and the literacy development of second language young learners. A literature review of literacy ideologies, policies, and research. (Master’s dissertation). University of Leeds, Leeds, England.

Rabindra, D. P., Nooreiny, M., & Hamidah, Y. (2016). Implementing phonics in Malaysia. International Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 1(1), 1-18.

Rose, J. (2006). Independent review of the teaching of early reading: Final report. Retrieved from www.standards.dfes.gov.uk/rosereview

Sidhu, G. K., Kaur, S., & Chi, L. J. (2018). CEFR-aligned school-based assessment in the Malaysian primary ESL classroom. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8, 452-463. doi:10.17509/ijal.v8i2.13311

Su, S. C. S., & Hawkins, J. (2013). THRASS phonics: A case study of Thomas as an emerging reader in English. The English Teacher, 42(1), 52-73. Retrieved from https://journals.melta.org. my/index.php/tet/article/view/231

Ukrainetz, T. A., Cooney, M. H., Dyer, S. K., Kysar, A. J., & Harris, T. J. (2000). An investigation into teaching phonemic awareness through shared reading and writing. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 15(3), 331–355. doi:10.1016/S0885-2006(00)00070-3

UNICEF. (2008). Education is a human right. Literacy and education in Malaysia: Key actions. Retrieved from http://www. unicef.org/malaysia/index.html

Wang, M., & Koda, K. (2005). Commonalities and differences in word identification skills among learners of English as a second language. Language Learning, 55, 71–98. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00416.x

Warid, M. (2015). The English language curriculum in Malaysian indigenous primary classrooms: The reality and the ideal. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. 21(3), 1-12. Retrieved from http://ejournals.ukm.my/3l/article/view/8580

Watts, Z., & Gardner, P. (2012). Is systematic synthetic phonics enough? Examining the benefit of intensive teaching of high frequency words (HFW) in a year one class. Education 3-13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 1-10. doi:10.1080/03004279.2012.710105

Wyse, D., & Goswami, U. (2008). Synthetic phonics and the teaching of reading. British Educational Research Journal, 34(6), 691-710. doi:10.1080/01411920802268912

Yap, J. R. (2014). Using systematic synthetic phonics as an approach for early literacy. The case of rural indigenous children (Master’s thesis). University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia). Retrieved from http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/5425/

Zulkifli, A., & Melor, M. Y. (2019). The effectiveness of using Jolly Phonics blending phonemes to Year 3 English Language classroom. International Journal of Humanities, Philosophy and Language, 2(8), 150-162. doi:10.35631/ijhpl.280011


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493