Blended Learning Approach to Mathematics Education Modules: An Analysis of Pre-Service Teachers’ Perceptions

Ifunanya Julie Adaobi Ubah, Erica D. Spangenberg, Viren Ramdhany

Abstract


Changes in the higher education institutions curriculum for South African schools have ushered in a blended learning approach to support the education process and to meet the needs of students. This change revolves around a blend of the use of online learning and traditional approaches to improve on pre-service mathematics teachers’ knowledge and academic performance. This paper explored pre-service mathematics teachers’ perceptions of the need for using a blended learning approach to mathematics education modules in other to ascertain if they will want to use b-learning in their future teaching career. This research involved a mixed-method using convenient purposive sampling to sample 42 pre-service mathematics teachers enrolled for a mathematics methodology module in a selected South African higher education institution. Responses to the questionnaire were used to conduct a descriptive analysis of each question. Qualitative data analysis from a semi-structured interview was analyzed thematically. The main finding revealed that pre-service mathematics teachers were optimistic that blended learning improved their performance, and have therefore expressed their readiness to adopt it in their future teaching career. However, pre-service teachers still need training and support to engage meaningfully in this approach to learning. 

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.7.17


Keywords


Blended learning; mathematics education modules; online learning; pre-service teachers’ perception; traditional face-to-face method

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abramovitz, B., Berezina, M., Bereman, A., & Shvartsman, L. (2012). A blended learning approach in mathematics. In A. Ajuan, M. A. Huertas, S. Trenholm and C. Streegmann (Eds), Teaching mathematics online: Emergent technology and methodologies, pp. 22–42.

Allison, S. (2015). #FeesHaveFallen: A big day in Pretoria, with a zero outcome. Retrieved from https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2015-10-23-feeshavefallen-a-big-day-in-pretoria-with-a-zero-outcome/#gsc.tab=0

Ashby, J., Sadera, W. C., & McNary, S. W. (2011). Comparing student success between developmental math courses offered online, blended, and face-to-face. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 10(3), 128-140. Retrieved from https://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/pdf/10.3.2.pdf

Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(1), 139-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7

Bennison, A., & Goos, M. (2010). Learning to teach mathematics with technology: A survey of professional development needs, experiences, and impacts. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 22(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217558

Bojuwoye, O., Moletsane, M., Stofile, S., Moola, F., & Sylvester, F. (2014). Learners’ experiences of learning support in selected Western Cape schools. South African Journal of Education, 34(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://www.ajol.info/index.php/saje/issue/view/11322

Borba, M., Askar, P., Engelbrecht, E., Gadanidis, G., Llinares, S., & Aguillar, M. (2016). Distance learning, blended learning, e-learning in mathematics. The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 48(1), 589–610. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-62597-3_14

Christensen, C., Horn, M., & Staker, H. (2013). Is K–12 blended learning disruptive? Introduction to the theory of hybrids. Lexington, MA and Redwood City, CA: The Clayton Christensen Institute. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED566878.pdf

Cloete, R. (2014). Effective blended learning in a higher education pathway program in South Africa. A research report for the award of the degree of Masters in Education, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Retrieved from https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/designing-and-conducting-mixed-methods-research/book241842.

Department of Basic Education. (2018). National Curriculum Statement Grades R-12. Pretoria: Government Printer. Retrieved from https://www.education.gov.za/Curriculum/NationalCurriculumStatementsGradesR-12.aspx

Fluck, A. (2018). Integration or transformation? A cross-national study of information and communication technology in school education. University of Tasmania, Australia.

Graham, C. R., & Spring, K. J. (2017). Thematic patterns in international blended learning literature, research, practices, and terminology. Online Learning, 21(4), 337–361. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i4.998

Green, W., Adendorff, M., & Mathebula, B. (2014). 'Minding the gap?' A national foundation phase teacher supply and demand analysis: 2012–2020. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 4(3), 2–23.

Hong, K., & Samimy, K. (2010). The influence of L2 teachers' use of CALL modes on language learners' reactions to blended learning. CALICO Journal, 27(2), 328–348. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.27.2.328-348

Johnson, S. N., & Haria, P. (2015). Effects of an IPad-based collaborative instruction on first graders at-risk for reading delays. International Journal of Technology and Inclusive Education, 4(2), 645–649.

Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. (2018). Activity theory as a framework for human technology-interaction research. Journal of Mind, Culture, and Activity, 25(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2017.1393089

Kaur, M. (2013). Blended learning: Its challenges and future. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 93(1), 612-617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.248

Kekena M. I. L., & Corke, E. (2015). Tuition fee protests shut down two of South Africa’s biggest universities. Eye Witness News. Retrieved from https://ewn.co.za/2015/10/19/Fee-protests-shuts-down-3-of-SAs-biggest-universities

Kintu, M. J., Zhu, C., & Kagambe, E. (2017). Blended learning effectiveness: the relationship between student characteristics, design features, and outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0043-4

Korstjens, I., & Moser, A. (2017). Series: Practical Guidance to Qualitative Research. Part 4. Trustworthiness and Publishing. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 120-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092

Krishnan, S. (2016). Students’ perceptions of learning mode in mathematics. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(2), 32-41. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1096003.pdf

Mahesh, K. (2017). Blended learning is the future. Retrieved from https://mg.co.za/article/2017-03-17-00-blended-learning-is-the-future/

Malm, J., Bryngfors, L., & Morner, L. L. (2011). Supplemental instruction: Whom does it serve? International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 23(3), 282–291. Retrieved from https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1130&context=ajpl

McGee, P., & Reis, A. (2012). Blended course design: A synthesis of best practices. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(4), 7–22. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/89268/

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Bakia, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1–47. Retrieved from https://archive.sri.com/work/publications/effectiveness-online-and-blended-learning-meta-analysis-empirical-literature

Medina, L. C. (2018). Blended learning: deficits and prospects in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 42-56. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3100

Mozelius, P., & Rydell, C. (2017). Problems Affecting Successful Implementation of blended learning environments are today part of mainstream education. In a broader definition blended. ICTE Journal, 2017, 6(1), 4-13. Retrieved from http://www.divaportal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1091525&dswid=mainwindow

Ndlovu, C. M., & Mostert, I. (2018) Teacher perceptions of moodle and throughput in a blended learning program for In-Service secondary school mathematics teachers. Africa Education Review, 15(2), 131-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2016.1241667

Ng’ambi, D., Brown, C., Bozalek, V., Gachago, D., & Denise (2016). Technology-enhanced teaching and learning in South African higher education – A review of a 20-year journey Wood. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(5), 843–858. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12485

Nnachi, R. O. (2007). Advanced Psychology of Learning and Scientific Enquiries. Owerri: Totan Publishers Ltd.

O’Byrne, W. I., & Pytash, K. E. (2015). Hybrid and blended learning: Modifying pedagogy across path, pace, time, and place. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 59(2), 137–140. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.463

Picciano, A. G. (2017). Theories and frameworks for online education: Seeking an integrated model. Online Learning, 21(3), 166-190. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i3.1225

Quinn, D., & Aarão, J. (2020). Blended learning in first-year engineering mathematics. ZDM Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01160-y

Ratcliff, D. (2016). 15 methods of data analysis in qualitative research. Retrieved from https://www.psychsoma.co.za/files/15methods.pdf

Rifai, A., & Sugiman, S. (2018). Students’ perceptions of mathematics mobile blended learning using a smartphone. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1097(1), 012153. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012153

Rizki, L. M., & Priatna N. (2019). Mathematical literacy as the 21st-century skill. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(4), 1–5. Retrieved from https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042088/pdf

SACMEQ (2012). Working Paper 8. Paris: Southern and Eastern Africa Consortium for Monitoring Educational Quality. Retrieved from https://resep.sun.ac.za/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Spaull-2012-SACMEQ-at-a-Glance-10-countries.pdf

Sauro, J. (2015). Five types of qualitative methods. Denver, Colorado. Retrieved from https://measuring.com/quali-methods/

Shand, K. & Glassett Farrelly, S. (2017). Using Blended Teaching to Teach Blended Learning: Lessons Learned from Pre-Service Teachers in an Instructional Methods Course. Journal of Online Learning Research, 3(1), 5-30. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/172566/.

Schechter, R., Kazakoff, E.R., Bundschuh, K., Prescott, J.E., & Macaruso, P. (2017). Exploring the impact of engaged teachers on implementation fidelity and reading skill gains in a blended learning reading program. Reading Psychology, 38(6), 553–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2017.1306602

Sharma, P. (2010). Blended learning. ELT Journal, 64(4), 456–458. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq043

Singh, R. J. (2015). Use of blended learning in higher education – some experiences. South. African Journal for Open and Distance Learning Practice, 37(1), 54-67. Retrieved from https://www.upjournals.co.za/index.php/Progressio/issue/view/27

Sinay, E., & Nahornick, A. (2016). Teaching and learning mathematics research series l: Effective instructional strategies. (Research Report No. 16/17-08). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Toronto District School Board. Retrieved from https://www.tdsb.on.ca/Portals/research/docs/reports/Teaching%20and%20Learning%20Math%20Research%20Series%201.pdf

Siyepu, S. W. (2018). Blended learning in a mathematics classroom: A focus in Khan Academy. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Educational and Pedagogical Sciences, 12(1), 7–15. Retrieved from https://publications.waset.org/abstracts/search?q=Khan%20Academy

Stoblein, M. (2009). Activity-based learning experiences in quantitative research methodology for young scholars-Course Design and Effectiveness. Retrieved from https://www.pomsmeetings.org/ConfProceedings/011/FullPapers/011-0782.pdf

Stols, G., Ferreira, R., Pelser, A., Olivier, W. A., Van der Merwe, A., De Villiers, C., & Venter, S. (2015). Perceptions and needs of South African mathematics teachers concerning their use of technology for instruction. South African Journal of Education, 35(4), 1209–1222. Retrieved from http://www.sajournalofeducation.co.za/index.php/saje/article/view/1209/605

Subramanian, K., Thangarasu, G., & Subramanian, T. (2018). The use of Digital Technology in Mathematics Education for Engineering Students. The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, 2(1), 376-383. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/tjssrr/2018p376-383.html

Tayebinik, M., & Puteh, M. (2012). Mobile learning to support teaching English as a Second Language. Journal of Education and Practice, 3(7), 56–62. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2279326

Thiyagu, K. (2011). Bachelor of education trainees’ perceptions towards blended learning in teaching and learning of mathematics. New Frontiers in Education, 1-12. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/7751142/b.ed._trainees_perceptions_towards_blended_learning_in_teaching_and_learning_of_mathematics

Tolley, H., & Mackenzie, H. (2015). Senior Management Perspectives on Mathematics and Statistics Support in Higher Education. Loughborough, UK: Sigma. Retrieved from http://www.sigma-network.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/sector-needs-analysis-report.pdf

Tomas, L., Doyle, T., & Skamp, K. (2019). Are our first-year students ready for a flipped classroom? A case for a flipped learning continuum. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0135-4

Ubah, I. J. A., & Bansilal, S. (2018). Pre-service mathematics teachers’ knowledge of mathematics for teaching: quadratic functions. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(6), 13–27. Retrieved from http://oaji.net/articles/2017/457-1545497857.pdf

Umoh, J. B., & Akpan, E. T. (2014). Challenges of Blended E-Learning Tools in Mathematics: Students’ Perspectives. Journal of Education and Learning, 4(3), 60-70. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v3n4p60

Jang, J., & Zhang, B. (2019). Artificial intelligence in intelligent tutoring Robots: A systematic review and design guidelines. Applied Sciences, 9(10), 2078. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9102078

Varthis, S., & Anderson, O. R. (2018). Students’ perceptions of a blended learning experience in dental education. European Journal of Dental Education, 22(1), 35-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12253

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The Development of higher psychological processes. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Retrieved from http://www.luzimarteixeira.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/vygotsky-1978-mind-and-society.pdf

Yılmaz, Ö., Malone, K. L. (2020). Preservice teachers' perceptions about the use of blended learning in a science education methods course. Smart Learn. Environ. 7(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00126-7

Zaretskii, V. K. (2009). The zone of proximal development. Journal of Russian and east European Psychology, 47(6), 70-93. https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405470604


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493