The Role of Individual Difference Factors among Early, Middle and Late Immersion Undergraduate ESL Learners

Olusiji Lasekan

Abstract


Numerous investigations on the impact of individual difference factors on second language learning are being carried out in order to improve the effectiveness and productivity of language learning-teaching process. Therefore, with the recent categorization of ESL learners at Indian colleges and universities into early, middle and late immersion students, this study examines the effect of individual difference factors (self-efficacy, anxiety, willingness to communicate, culture, human (peers’, teachers’ and parents’ motivational influence) and their interrelatedness with the learners’ motivational intensity as well as English proficiency on each group of immersion learners. A structured, self-report questionnaire was administered to over three hundred and fifty eight students in different colleges. Participants were classified into different immersion groups based on the number of years they had studied either in English or Vernacular medium high school. Apart from low motivational intensity recorded among early immersion students, the inferential statistics shows a moderate positive correlation between motivational intensity and other motivational variable factors such as self-confidence and human (teachers’, parents’ and peers’ motivational influence). Correlational analysis also suggests the positive impact of self-confidence and intrinsic motivation on learners’ English proficiency enhancement. Several potential interpretations for findings and implications for L2 language pedagogy and research are discussed.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.10.11


Keywords


India; Immersion; Individual difference factors; Motivational intensity; English proficiency

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ababneh, S. (2013). The effects of motivation on female EFL students’ language proficiency. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(7), 118-124.

Aljasir, N. (2016). Individual differences among Saudi learners of English as a foreign language: an exploratory correlational study of learning styles, affective factors and English proficiency and performance (Doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham).

Alrajhi, M. N., & Aldhafri, S. S. (2015). Peer Tutoring Effects on Omani Students’ English Self-Concept. International Education Studies, 8(6), 184. http://doi:10.5539/ies.v8n6p184

Anand, C. L. (1971). The Study of the Effect of Socio-economic Environment and Medium of Instruction on the Mental Abilities and Academic Achievement of Children in Mysore State (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, University of Mysore, Mysore).

Andrade, M., & Williams, K. (2009). Foreign Language Learning Anxiety in Japanese EFL University Classes: Physical, Emotional, Expressive, and Verbal Reactions. Sophia Junior College Faculty Journal, 29, 1–24.

Basta, J. (2011). The role of the communicative approach and cooperative learning in higher education. Facta Universitatis- Series: Linguistics and Literature, 9(2), 125- 144.

Dornyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and Researching Motivation. Applied Linguistics in Action. http://doi:10.4324/9781315833750

Entwislea, D. R., & Astone, N. M. (1994). Some practical guidelines for measuring youth's race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Child Development, 65(6), 1521-1540. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1131278

Fachtmann, R., Fountaine, S., Grove, R., Hoshino, B., Jensen, D., Kiak, L. S., ... & Matsuda, S. (2001). Personality, motivation, anxiety, strategies, and language proficiency of Japanese students. Motivation and second language acquisition, 23, 361.

Firdosfida, M., & Ravindra, K. (2016). Relationship between students’ motivation, attitude and motivational intensity toward English learning, 5(2), 27–33.

Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. Arnold. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100007634

Gayton, A. (2010). Socioeconomic status and language-learning motivation: To what extent does the former influence the latter? Scottish Languages Review, 22(1), 17-28.

Gregersen, T. (2000). The individual differences that distinguish high and low output students. Revistasignos, 33(47), 87-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S071809342000000100008

Guilloteaux, M. J., & Dornyei, Z. (2008). Motivating Language Learners: A Classroom-Oriented Investigation of the Effects of Motivational Strategies on Student Motivation. TESOL Quarterly: A Journal for Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages and of Standard English as a Second Dialect, 42(1), 55–77. http://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00207.x

Henkel, B. (2009). Motivation to learn a second language for minority students. Practice and Theory in Systems of Education, 4(2), 63–78.

Hiromori, T., Matsumoto, H., & Nakayama, A. (2012). Profiling individual differences of successful and unsuccessful L2 readers. The Journal of AsiaTEFL, 9(2), 49-70. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.03.009

Hong, Y. C., & Ganapathy, M. (2017). To Investigate ESL Students' Instrumental and Integrative Motivation towards English Language Learning in a Chinese School in Penang: Case Study. English Language Teaching, 10(9), 17-35.

Johari, A. (2015, July 30). Taunting, teasing, segregation: What regional-language students face in English-medium colleges? Scroll.in.

Khodadady, E., & Khajavy, G. H. (2013). Exploring the Role of Anxiety and Motivation in Foreign Language Achievement: a Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Porta Linguarum: Revista Internacional de Didáctica de Las Lenguas Extranjeras, (20), 269–286.

Kidd, E., Donnelly, S., & Christiansen, M. H. (2018). Individual differences in language acquisition and processing. Trends in cognitive sciences, 22(2), 154-169. https://doi:10.1016/j.tics.2017.11.006

Lahuerta, A. C. (2014). Factors affecting willingness to communicate in a Spanish university context. IJES, International Journal of English Studies, 14(2), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.6018/j.193611

Lasekan, O. A. (2019). Self-Assessment of English Proficiency among Early, Middle and Late Immersion Undergraduate Students. In Basavaraja Kodagunti (Ed.), Papers on Current Issues in Indian Linguistics (pp. 55–64). Maski, India: Bandara Parkashana India.

MacIntyre, P. D., Dörnyei, Z., Clément, R., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545–562. http://doi:10.1111/j.15404781.1998.tb05543.x.

McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1990). Willingness to communicate: Differing cultural perspectives. Southern Communication Journal, 56(August 2014), 72–77 http://doi.org/10.1080/10417949009372817

Mustapha, W. Z. W. (2010). ESL students’ communication apprehension and their choice of communicative activities. Asean Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (AJTLHE), 2(1), 22-29.

Oroujlou, N., & Vahedi, M. (2011). Motivation, attitude, and language learning. In Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 29, pp. 994 1000). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.333

Oxford, R. L., & Ehrman, M. (1992). Second language research on individual differences. Annual review of applied linguistics, 13, 188-205. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500002464

Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Prentice Hall.

Rahmanpanah, H. (2017). Self-determination Theory as a Grand Theory of Motivation in EFL Classroom. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 4(6), 153-164.

Robinson, P. (Ed.). (2002). Individual differences and instructed language learning (Vol. 2). John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.2.13rob

Satriani, I. (2014). Correlation between Students’ Self Esteem and English Language Proficiency of Indonesian EFL Students. Journal of English Language Teaching in Indonesia, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.22460/eltin.v2i2.p%25p


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493