Inattentive Students Errors in Mathematics: Alarming Repetition

Heba Bakr Khoshaim

Abstract


In mathematics classrooms, errors in students’ responses are expected. Such errors are repeatable and predictable. In many cases, the reasons behind such errors might be a lack of comprehension, or inaccuracy in the employed algorithm or even the wrong implementation of algebraic rules. However, errors could occur because of a lack of attention. Students in many cases are not mindful during the process of writing to their responses. Addressing students’ errors in mathematics is not a new topic in mathematics education research. Previous studies looked at the influence of errors on students and teachers and their reactions to such errors. Moreover, few studies analysed the type of errors in mathematics classrooms (Guse, 2017). This study aims to investigate the most common inattentive errors occurred in students’ responses. The sample was chosen from one private university in Riyadh, the capital city of Saudi Arabia. Students’ responses in two calculus classes during the two semesters of academic year 2017-2018 were considered. The researcher analysed 250 students’ written mathematical assessments. In addition, 30 photographs of students’ work on classrooms’ whiteboards were explored. From the analyses, it appeared that missing a symbol (such as the equal sign) or a notation (such as  were the most common inattentive errors whether in classrooms or in exams. The misuse of the equal sign and other symbols come next in repetition. The miss-order of operations appeared to be the error that most likely leads to an inaccurate result and might totally change the flow of the task.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.17.11.9


Keywords


Mathematical errors; writing in mathematics classrooms; mathematical language; students’ responses

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bray, W. S. (2013). How to leverage the potential of mathematical errors: Incorporating a focus on students’ mistakes into your instruction can advance their understanding. Teaching Children Mathematics, 19(7), 425–431. https://doi.org/10.5951/teacchilmath.19.7.0424

Chang, B. L., Cromley, J. G., & Tran, N. (2016). Coordinating multiple representations in a reform calculus textbook. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14, 1475–1497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9652-3

Dündar, S. (2016). Does writing have any effect on mathematics success? Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i1.989

Freeman, B., Higgins, K. N., & Horney, M. (2016). How students communicate mathematical ideas: An examination of multimodal writing using digital technologies. Contemporary Educational Technology, 7(4), 281–313. doi: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1117603.pdf

Gagatsis, A., & Kyriakides, L. (2000). Teachers’ attitudes towards their pupils’ mathematical errors. Educational Research and Evaluation, 6(1), 24–58. https://doi.org/10.1076/1380-3611(200003)6:1;1-i;ft024

Guse, I. K. (2017). Mathematical writing errors in expository writings of college mathematics students. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 6(3), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v6i3.8549

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320371742_Mathematical_Writing_Errors_in_Expository_Writings_of_College_Mathematics_Students

Ingram, J., Pitt, A., & Baldry, F. (2015). Handling errors as they arise in whole-class interactions. Research in Mathematics Education, 17(3), 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2015.1098562

Lee, K. (2010). A guide to writing mathematics. Retrieved on 1 July 2018 from http://web.cs. ucdavis.edu/~amenta/w10/writingman.pdf.

Lo Ìpez-Gay, R., Sa Ìez, M., & Torregrosa, M. (2015). Obstacles to mathematization in physics: The case of the differential. Science and Education, 24, 591–613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-015-9757-7

McCormick, K. (2010). Experiencing the power of learning mathematics though writing. Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers: The Journal, 4(2), 1–8. doi: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ914259.pdf.

Naidoo, K., & Naidoo, R. (2007). Students understanding of the derivative in a blended learning environment: Teaching Calculus in a blended learning environment. The International Journal of Learning, 14(4), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/cgp/v14i04/45279

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

Pacurar, M., & Rus, I. A. (2018). Some remarks on the notations and terminology in the ordered set theory. Creative Mathematics and Informatics, 27(2), 191–195. doi: http://creative-mathematics.ubm.ro/

Porter, M. K, & Masingila, M. O. (1995). The effect of writing to earn mathematics on the types of errors students make in a college calculus class. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (17th PME-NA, Columbus, OH, October 21-24).

Powell, S. R., & Hebert, M. A. (2016). Influence of writing ability and computation skill on mathematics writing. The Elementary School Journal, 117(2), 310–335. https://doi.org/10.1086/688887

Santagata, R. (2004). Are you joking or are you sleeping? Cultural beliefs and practices in Italian and U.S. teachers’ mistake-handling strategies. Linguistic and Education, 15, 41–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2004.12.002

Schleppenbach, M., Flevares, L. M., Sims, L. M., & Perry, M. (2007). Teachers’ responses to student mistakes in Chinese and U.S. mathematics classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 108(2), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1086/525551 Actions

Shingareva, I. K., & Liza’rraga-Celaya, C. (2015). On different symbolic notations for derivatives. The Mathematical Intelligencer, 37(3), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00283-014-9526-5

Steuer, G., Rosentritt-Brunn, G., & Dresel, M. (2013). Dealing with errors in mathematics classrooms: Structure and relevance of perceived error climate. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 196–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.03.002

Urquhart, V. (2009). Using writing in mathematics to deepen student learning. Denver, CO: McREL International. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED544239.pdf

Usiskin, Z. (2012). What does it mean to understand some mathematics? Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education. Seoul, Korea: ICME. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17187-6_46

Veloo, A., Krishnasamy, H. N., & Wan Abdullah, W. S. (2015). Types of student errors in mathematical symbols, graphs and problem-solving. Asian Social Science, 11(15), 324-334. doi: https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n15p324

Vincent, J., Bardini, C., Pierce, R., & Pearn, C. (2015). Misuse of the equals sign: An entrenched practice from early primary years to tertiary mathematics. Australian Senior Mathematics Journal, 29(2), 31–39. doi: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286418817_Misuse_of_the_equals_sign_An_entrenched_practice_from_early_primary_years_to_tertiary_mathematics.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493