Chinese and American Elementary Mathematics Teachers’ Between Desk Instruction

Li Sun, Yingqiu Wang

Abstract


The purpose of this study is to understand how Chinese and American elementary mathematics teachers conduct Between Desk Instruction (BDI) and identify the similarities and differences between their actions. Qualitative research method was used to answer the research questions. During BDI, both Chinese and American elementary mathematics teachers monitored student progress, expressed inquiries that called for answers from students, provided instruction or advice at desk, guided through questioning and answered students’ questions. The majority of Chinese teachers utilized BDI to select which student’s work, methods or ideas needed to be shared with the whole class. All American teachers encouraged students to try their best and provided support to individual students, while only three Chinese teachers cheered students during BDI. The findings of the study contribute to our understanding of the elementary mathematics teaching practices in China and America.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.17.4.3



Keywords


Elementary mathematics; Between Desk Instruction; Chinese teachers; American teachers

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ball, D., Lubienski, S., & Mewborn, D. (2001). Research on teaching mathematics: The unsolved problem of teachers’ mathematical knowledge. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 443-456). Washington, D.C.: American Educational Research Association.

Borko, H. (2016). Methodological contributions to video-based studies of classroom teaching and learning: A commentary. ZDM, 48(1-2), 213-218.

Cai, J. (2000). Mathematical thinking involved in U.S. and Chinese students’ solving process-constrained and process-open problems. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2, 309–340.

Cai, J. (2005). U.S. and Chinese teachers’ knowing, evaluating, and constructing representations in mathematics instruction. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7(2), 135–169.

Cai, J., Ding, M., & Wang, T. (2014). How do exemplary Chinese and U.S. mathematics teachers view instructional coherence? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85(2), 265–280.

Clarke, D. (2004). Kikan-shido: Between desks instruction. Paper presented at the 85th Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.

Clarke, D., Emanuelsson, J., Jablonka, E., & Mok, I. A. C. (Eds.). (2006a). Making connections: Comparing mathematics classrooms around the world. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers B.V.

Clarke, D., Keitel, C., & Shimizu, Y. (Eds.). (2006b). Mathematics classrooms in 12 countries: The insiders’ perspective. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers B.V.

Ding, M., & Li, X. (2010). A comparative analysis of the distributive property in the US and Chinese elementary mathematics textbooks. Cognition and Instruction, 28, 146-180.

Ding, M., & Li, X. (2014). Transition from concrete to abstract representations: The distributive property in a Chinese textbook series. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 87, 103-121.

Hiebert, J., & Morris, A. (2012). Teaching, rather than teachers, as a path toward improving classroom instruction. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(2), 92-102.

Hiebert, J., Miller, E, & Berk, D. (2017). Relationships between mathematics teacher preparation and graduates’ analysis of classroom teaching. The Elementary School Journal, 117(4), 687-707.

Hino, K. (2006). The role of seatwork in three Japanese classrooms. In D. Clarke, C. Keitel, & Y. Shimizu (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms in 12 countries: The insiders’ perspective (pp. 59–74). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers B.V.

Huang, R., & Li, Y. (2012). What matters most: A comparison of expert and novice teachers’ noticing of mathematics classroom events. School Science and Mathematics, 112(7), 420-432.

Huang, R. (2002). Mathematics teaching in Hong Kong and Shanghai-A classroom analysis from the perspective of variation. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. The University of Hong Kong.

Kersting, N. (2008). Using video clips of mathematics classroom instruction as item prompts to measure teachers’ knowledge of teaching mathematics. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68(5), 845-861

Li, Y., & Kaiser, G. (2011). Expertise in mathematics instruction: Advancing research and practice from an international perspective. Expertise in Mathematics Instruction, 3-15.

Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.

Mok, I. A. C. (2015). Research on mathematics classroom practice: An international perspective. In J. C. Sung (Ed.), Selected regular lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 589–606). New York: Springer.

Moy, R., & Peverly, S. (2005). Perceptions of mathematics curricula and teaching in China. Psychology in the Schools, 42(3), 251-258.

NCTM (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics). (2014). Position statement on access and equity in mathematics education. Reston, VA: NCTM.

O'Keefe, K., Xu, L. H., & Clarke, D. J. (2006). Chapter Four: Kikan-Shido: Between Desks Instruction. In D. J. Clarke, J. Emanuellson, E. Jablonka & I. A. C. Mok (Eds.), Making Connections: Comparing Mathematics Classrooms Around the World. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Roche, A., & Clarke, D. (2015). Describing the nature and effect of teacher interactions with students during seat work on challenging tasks. In M. Marshman, V. Geiger, & A. Bennison (Eds.). Mathematics Education in the Margins. (Proceedings of the 38th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia), pp. 532-539. Sunshine Coast: MERGA.

Shimizu, Y. (2003). Capturing the Structure of Japanese Mathematics Lessons as Embedded in the Teaching Unit. Paper presented as part of the symposium "Mathematics Lessons in Germany, Japan, the USA and Australia: Structure in Diversity and Diversity in Structure" at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, April 21-25.

Speer, N., & Wagner, J. (2009). Knowledge needed by a teacher to provide analytic scaffolding during undergraduate mathematics classroom discussions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(5), 530-562.

Stigler, J. W., & Fernandez, C. (1995). Learning mathematics from class instruction: Cross-cultural and experimental perspectives. Basic and Applied Perspectives on Learning, Cognition, and Development, 103-130.

Stigler, J. W., Lee, S., & Stevenson, H. W. (1990). Mathematical knowledge of Japanese, Chinese, and American elementary school children. Reston, VA: NCTM.

Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). “The teaching gap.†Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: The Free Press.

Sun, L., & Hanna, W. (2013). Characterizing pivotal teaching moments in experienced mathematics teachers’ practice. In M. Martinez & A. Castro Superfine (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, pp. 1026-1032. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois at Chicago.

Wagner, D. (2007). Students’ critical awareness of voice and agency in mathematics classroom discourse. Mathematical thinking and learning, 9(1), 31-50.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493