How a Hands-on BIONICS Lesson May Intervene with Science Motivation and Technology Interest

Michaela Marth, Franz X. Bogner

Abstract


Science is supposed to raise and support young children’s interest as early as possible, at the latest at the beginning of secondary school. Our empirical study monitored individual motivation levels towards science of 6th graders by applying established measures to 324 students (age M=12.2 years, 189 girls, 135 boys). The first empirical measure consisted of the Science Motivation Questionnaire (SMQ), the second of the Technology Questionnaire (TQ). Our lesson consisted of a student-centered outreach module about bionics within a zoological garden in combination with related exhibition. Measurement was conducted two weeks before (T0), directly after (T1) and six weeks (T2) after program participation. The factor structure of the SMQ-II we obtained showed a major difference to the published structure: our young sample couldn’t differentiate between intrinsic motivation (IM) and self-efficacy (SE). Moreover, the expected two subscales merged into one which we labelled self-confidence (SC). The other subscale “grade motivation†followed the expected factor structure of the original scale. While this latter subscale was unaffected by our intervention, the sub-scale SC peaked directly after program participation, but unfortunately did not sustain this shift over a six week time period. There were no gender differences at any testing point. Science motivation correlated at a low level with technology interest but failed to correlate with social implications of technology.


Keywords


science motivation, factor structure, assessment, gender issues, technology interest, bionics module

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aikenhead, G. S., & Ryan, A. G. (1992). The Development of a New Instrument: “Views on Science- Technology-Society†(VOSTS). Science Education, 76(5), 477–491. http://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730760503

Akpınar, E., Yıldız, E., Tatar, N., & Ergin, Ö. (2009). Students’ attitudes toward science and technology: an investigation of gender, grade level, and academic achievement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 2804–2808. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.498

Ardies, J., De Maeyer, S., & David Gijbels. (2013). Reconstructing the Pupils Attitude Towards Technology-survey. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 18(2006), 8–19. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&profile=ehost&scope=site&authtype=crawler&jrnl=13601431&AN=91702283&h=dt+AM1P/ZeQYPMqTzjcxpE+PJ1NYwwdO5PJwmocqbfl5B1IUkxSzSZjCguQ6Akp0fxd+6ZjD+GDpTJy5+QQBMw==&crl=c

Ardies, J., De Maeyer, S., Gijbels, D., & van Keulen, H. (2015). Students attitudes towards technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25(1), 43–65. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9268-x

Bandura, A. (1977). Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action : a Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall, 1986. xiii, 617 pp. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/13273-005

Bandura, A. (1994). Self-Efficacy. Encyclopedia of Human Behavio, 4, 71–81. http://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0836

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, 4, 71–81. http://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0836

Bannasch, R. (2009). Bionics. In Technology Guide (pp. 178–183). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88546-7_35

Bechert, D. W., Bruse, M., Hage, W., Van Der Hoeven, J. G. T., & Hoppe, G. (1997). Experiments on drag-reducing surfaces and their optimization with an adjustable geometry. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 338, 59–87. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112096004673

Benabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2002). Self-confidence and personal motivation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 3(1), 871–914. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2

Blickenstaff, J. C. (2005). Women and science careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17(4), 369–386. http://doi.org/10.1080/09540250500145072

Brickman, P., Gormally, C., Armstrong, N., & Hallar, B. (2009). Effects of inquiry-based learning on students’ science literacy skills and confidence. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(2), 1–22. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.11.003

Conradty, C., & Bogner, F. (2008). vs. textbook: Effects on motivation and gain in knowledgeComputer. Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on E-Learning, ECEL 2008, 1(August), 231–238. http://doi.org/10.3390/educsci6030029

Dasgupta, N., & Stout, J. G. (2014). Girls and Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: STEMing the Tide and Broadening Participation in STEM Careers. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 21–29. http://doi.org/10.1177/2372732214549471

DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific Literacy : Another Look at Its Historical and Contemporary Meanings and Its Relationship to Science Education Reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601. http://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (Vol. 53). http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Field, A. (2013). Andy Field - Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. (M. Carmichael, Ed.) (4th ed.). London: Sage Publications. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04270_1.x

Frome, P. M., Alfeld, C. J., Eccles, J. S., & Barber, B. L. (2006). Why don’t they want a male-dominated job? An investigation of young women who changed their occupational aspirations. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(4), 359–372. http://doi.org/10.1080/13803610600765786

Geier, C., & Bogner, F. X. (2011). Learning at workstations . Students ’ satisfaction , attitudes towards cooperative learning and intrinsic motivation. Journal for Educational Research Online, 3(2), 3–14.

George, R. (2006). A Cross â€domain Analysis of Change in Students’ Attitudes toward Science and Attitudes about the Utility of Science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(6), 571–589. http://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500338755

Gerstner, S., & Bogner, F. X. (2010). Cognitive Achievement and Motivation in Hands-on and Teacher-Centred Science Classes: Does an additional hands-on consolidation phase (concept mapping) optimise cognitive learning at work stations? International Journal of Science Education, 32(7), 849–870. http://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902803604

Glynn, Shawn M., Koballa Thomas R., J. (2006). Motivation to learn in college science. Retrieved from https://coe.uga.edu/assets/files/mse/smqii-10-glynn-koballa-2006.pdf

Glynn, S. M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science motivation questionnaire II: Validation with science majors and nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1159–1176. http://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20442

Glynn, S. M., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Brickman, P. (2009). Science motivation questionnaire: Construct validation with nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 127–146. http://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20267

Goldschmidt, M., & Bogner, F. X. (2015). Learning About Genetic Engineering in an Outreach Laboratory: Influence of Motivation and Gender on Students’ Cognitive Achievement. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 6(2), 166–187. http://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2015.1031293

Hedler, C. S., & Bogner, F. X. (2013). Creative Learning Setting: Autonomous Self-Regulatory Support as Smoking Prevention. Creative Education, 4(2), 154–159. http://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.42022

Hutcheson, G., & Sofroniou, N. (1999). The multivariate social scientist. Introductory statistics using generalized linear models. http://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028075

Institute ISB. (2004). Curriculum 6th grade. Retrieved from https://www.isb.bayern.de/gymnasium/lehrplan/gymnasium/fachprofil-ebene-2/natur-und-technik-/325/

Jacobs, J. E., & Bleeker, M. M. (2004). Girls’ and boys’ developing interests in math and science: do parents matter? New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2004(106), 5–21. http://doi.org/10.1002/cd.113

Kaiser, H. F. (1960). Consequently Perhaps. Measurement, XX(1), 141–151.

Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika, 35(4), 401–415.

Kiemer, K., Gröschner, A., Pehmer, A. K., & Seidel, T. (2015). Effects of a classroom discourse intervention on teachers’ practice and students’ motivation to learn mathematics and science. Learning and Instruction, 35, 94–103. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.10.003

Kleinginna, P. R., & Kleinginna, A. M. (1981). A categorized list of motivation definitions, with a suggestion for a consensual definition. Motivation and Emotion, 5(3), 263–291. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993889

Kleitman, S., & Stankov, L. (2007). Self-confidence and metacognitive processes. Learning and Individual Differences, 17(2), 161–173. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.004

Kyndt, E., Raes, E., Lismont, B., Timmers, F., Cascallar, E., & Dochy, F. (2013). A meta-analysis of the effects of face-to-face cooperative learning. Do recent studies falsify or verify earlier findings? Educational Research Review, 10, 133–149. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.02.002

Larson, R. W., & Verma, S. (1999). How children and adolescents spend time across the world: Work, play, and developmental opportunities. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 701–736. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.701

Larson, R. W., Wilson, S., Brown, B. B., Furstenberg, Jr., F. F., & Verma, S. (2002). Changes in adolescents’ interpersonal experiences: Are they being prepared for adult relationships in the twenty-first century? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 12(1), 31–68. http://doi.org/10.1111/1532-7795.00024

Laugksch, R. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84, 71–94. http://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200001)84:1<71::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-C

Lin, Y. G., McKeachie, W. J., & Kim, Y. C. (2001). College student intrinsic and/or extrinsic motivation and learning. Learning and Individual Differences. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(02)00092-4

Marth, M. & Bogner, F. X. (2017a). Monitoring a gender gap in interest and social implications of technology in different age groups: a revision of the Technology Questionnaire. Under Submission.

Marth, M. & Bogner, F. X. (2017b). Does the issue of bionics within a student-centered, zoological garden module generate long-term knowledge? Under Submission.

Martin-Sempere, M. J., Garzon-Garcia, B., & Rey-Rocha, J. (2008). Scientists’ motivation to communicate science and technology to the public: surveying participants at the Madrid Science Fair. Public Understanding of Science, 17(3), 349–367. http://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506067660

Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strike rule against pure discovery learning? American Psychologist, 59(1), 14–19. http://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.14

Mc Robbie, J. C. ; (2000). Preservice primary teachers' thinking about technology and technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10(d), 81–101.

Miller, J. D. (1983). Scientific Literacy: A Conceptual and Empirical Review. Daedalus (Boston), 112(2), 29–48. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20024852

Mistler-Jackson, M., & Songer, N. B. (2000). Student Motivation and Internet Technology : Are Students Empowered to Learn Science ? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(5), 459–479.

Nachtigall, W., & Wisser, A. (2013). Bionik in Beispielen: 250 illustrierte Ansätze. Springer-Verlag. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Neinhuis, C., & Barthlott, W. (1997). Characterization and Distribution of Water-repellent, Self-cleaning Plant Surfaces. Annals of Botany, 79(6), 667–677. http://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1997.0400

O’Keeffe, G. S., & Clarke-Pearson, K. (2011). The Impact of Social Media on Children, Adolescents, and Families. PEDIATRICS, 127(4), 800–804. http://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-0054

Obrentz, S. (2012). Predictors of Science Success: The Impact of Motivation and Learning Strategies on College Chemistry Performance. Educational Psychology and Special Education Dissertations.

Oeffner, J., & Lauder, G. V. (2012). The hydrodynamic function of shark skin and two biomimetic applications. Journal of Experimental Biology, 215(5), 785–795. http://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.063040

Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079. http://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199

Pajares, F. (2002). Gender and perceived self-efficacy in self-regulated learning. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 116–125. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_8

Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and Self-Regulated Learning Components of Classroom Academic Performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33

Poudel, D. D., Vincent, L. M., Anzalone, C., Huner, J., Wollard, D., Clement, T., … Blakewood, G. (2005). Hands-On Activities and Challenge Tests in Agricultural and Environmental Education. Journal of Environmental Education, 36(4), 10–22.

Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. http://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Schaal, S., & Bogner, F. X. (2005). Human visual perception - learning at workstations. Journal of Biological Education, 40(1), 32–37. http://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2005.9656006

Schmid, S., &Bogner, F.X. (2017). How an inquiry-based lesson in upper secondary classrooms intervene with science motivation. Under Submission.

Schumm, M. F., & Bogner, F. X. (2016). Measuring adolescent science motivation. International Journal of Science Education, 38(3), 434–449. http://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1147659

Simpkins, S. D., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Math and Science Motivation: A Longitudinal Examination of the Links Between Choices and Beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 70–83. http://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.70

Steele, J., James, J. B., & Barnett, R. C. (2002). Learning in a Man’S World: Examining the Perceptions of Undergraduate Women in Male-Dominated Academic Areas. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26(1), 46–50. http://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.00042

Sturm, H., & Bogner, F. X. (2008). Studentâ€oriented versus Teacherâ€centred: The effect of learning at workstations about birds and bird flight on cognitive achievement and motivation. International Journal of Science Education, 30(7), 941–959. http://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701313995

Terry, N., Mills, L., & Sollosy, M. (2008). Student Grade Motivation as a Determinant of Performance on the Business Major Field ETS Exam. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 5(7), 27–32. Retrieved from https://proxy.library.upenn.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/742882889?accountid=14707%5Cnhttp://elinks.library.upenn.edu/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/ProQ%3Aericshell&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:jou

Ülkü-Steiner, B., Kurtz-Costes, B., & Kinlaw, C. R. (2000). Doctoral student experiences in gender-balanced and male-dominated graduate programs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 296–307. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.296

Vedder-Weiss, D., & Fortus, D. (2011). Adolescents’ Declining motivation to learn science: Inevitable or not? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 199–216. http://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20398

Wigfield, A. (1996). Development between the ages of ll and 25. Handbook of Educational Psychology, 148.

Zeyer, A. (2010). Motivation to Learn Science and Cognitive Style. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science & Technology Education, 6(2), 121–128.

Zeyer, A., & Wolf, S. (2010). Is There a Relationship between Brain Type, Sex and Motivation to Learn Science? International Journal of Science Education, 32(16), 2217–2233. http://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903585184

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(March), 82–91. http://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016

Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (1997). Developmental phases in self-regulation: Shifting from process to outcome goals. Journal of Educational Psychology... Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 29–36. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.241

Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2008). Motivation: An essential dimension of self-regulated learning. Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning: Theory, Research, and Applications, 1–30. http://doi.org/10.4324/9780203831076


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1694-2116

p-ISSN: 1694-2493